• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheists: What would be evidence of God’s existence?

ppp

Well-Known Member
God could communicate with each of us directly but we could not understand God because humans were not created with the capacity to understand God speaking to us directly.

He's not projecting. The common usage of the word 'omnipotent' means having unlimited power, and able to do anything. If you have a different usage of the word, then don't blame Kfox when you do not reveal your private definitions.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
The Bahai faith is loaded with contradictions. I've had my eyes opened on this forum and about this subject.

I thought, before I read Tb's hundreds of posts about her faith, that Bahai was an all-encompassing, gentle, rational belief system. However, she has persuaded me, along with the absence of evidence in the writings of the so-called messenger, that it is anything but.
I had several Baha'i friends that were very liberal about their beliefs. They didn't get pushing about the claims of the Baha'i Faith. There focus was on making friends with people of all religions. And that is part of the Baha'is Faith.
On all occasions, association with the followers of other religions offers an opportunity to give expression to that genuine spirit of fellowship that flows from recognition that all of the great religions have come from the one same Source and that diversity of opinion need not be a cause of conflict. – The Universal House of Justice,

Wherefore, O my loving friends! Consort with all the peoples, kindreds and religions of the world with the utmost truthfulness, uprightness, faithfulness, kindliness, good-will and friendliness, that all the world of being may be filled with the holy ecstasy of the grace of Bahá, that ignorance, enmity, hate and rancor may vanish from the world and the darkness of estrangement amidst the peoples and kindreds of the world may give way to the Light of Unity. Should other peoples and nations be unfaithful to you show your fidelity unto them, should they be unjust toward you show justice towards them, should they keep aloof from you attract them to yourselves, should they show their enmity be friendly towards them, should they poison your lives, sweeten their souls, should they inflict a wound upon you, be a salve to their sores. Such are the attributes of the sincere! Such are the attributes of the truthful.
- ‘Abdu’l-Baha
Unfortunately, so much depends on who you meet and talk to. And then, if you catch them on a good day.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
By definition; to communicate requires both parties to be able to understand each other. if we do not understand God, then he is not communicating with us.
If we could all hear from God directly, then why would we need these messengers and their religions. But then I hear how some spiritual people that say we all do have a spiritual/divine part of ourselves that can and does communicate with that divine/spiritual thing that is everywhere and all-knowing and all loving and all those other all's. Also, since some Baha'is have had dreams and visions of Abdul Baha', then God is finding ways to communicate to people. It's just that God has to learn how to stop giving mixed messages.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
That's all woo. ;)


I believe that satan causes confusion and mischief.

JYrZOW4.jpg
 

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
God could communicate (share information with humans) but they would have no ability to understand what God shared.

Therefore, God could not communicate with humans, since God cannot do the impossible. He cannot, for example create a married bachelor, or a square circle.

Again, Logic 101
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
Therefore, God could not communicate with humans, since God cannot do the impossible. He cannot, for example create a married bachelor, or a square circle.

Again, Logic 101
To communicate with humans is not doing the impossible; I do it all the time!
 

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
I never said it was. A person is convinced by the evidence, that is how it works. Atheists have told me that.

And evidence can only be convincing if other people can check it.

Sorry, but I am not going to cover this ground again. However, if you thought logically you would realize that everyone has biases so whoever was checking my work would just be tossing their own biases into the hat! And I would never realize it...

And that's why we get others to check. Because they are unlikely to have the same biases as us, so any flaws introduced by our biases can be found and removed.

That was some time ago and I am sure you had a good reason for doing so. But since then you have been mired in the same atheist beliefs. Many Christians become atheists but Baha'is do not become atheists because they have no reason to do so.

Oh yes, any belief held for a long timed means the person is "mired."

That's right. The Messenger has information that could not possibly be known by anyone else other than God. Since the future cannot be known by anyone else but God, the fact that Baha'u'llah predicted many things about the future qualifies.

Every so called prophet has people who claim the same thing. Mr B is not special in that regard.

I never said it proved that. How do you think you can verify that a Messenger really got messages from God? But what if He actually did?

Is your argument to be based on "What if"s now?

Claiming is very easy, but backing up the claim is not easy.

I have yet to see any evidence that Mr B has done it.

Maybe so, but since there are no such booming voices from the sky we have to assume that is not how God chooses to communicate to humans.

Or maybe we can also assume that God is not real.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
And evidence can only be convincing if other people can check it.
Why would that be the case?
And that's why we get others to check. Because they are unlikely to have the same biases as us, so any flaws introduced by our biases can be found and removed.
No, that would only introduce their biases. Sorry you cannot understand this.
Oh yes, any belief held for a long timed means the person is "mired."
So a person should change their belief that they have determined is true just so they won't be mired? Where would that lead, changing beliefs as the seasons change?
Every so called prophet has people who claim the same thing. Mr B is not special in that regard.
They can claim whatever they want but they don't have what Baha'u'llah has to back up their claims.
Is your argument to be based on "What if"s now?
It is not a what if for me, it is a what if for you and other nonbelievers.
I have yet to see any evidence that Mr B has done it.
I guess you did not look very far.
Or maybe we can also assume that God is not real.
That certainly is a choice you can make.
 

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
So a person should change their belief that they have determined is true just so they won't be mired? Where would that lead, changing beliefs as the seasons change?
You miss the point. You accuse others of being mired in their beliefs but fail to see the possibility that the same can be said of you.

No, God does not have the ability to communicate with each of us directly in a way we can understand, but I won't quit calling God omniscient and omnipotent because that is what God is.
And there we have it. Tb admits that God is unable to do certain things, but nevertheless, she will continue to call him omniscient and omnipotent. There's logic for you!! :rolleyes:


What you do is project YOUR own ideas of what it means for God to be omniscient and omnipotent and then you lay your expectations on God. That is readily apparent to anyone who even has a basic knowledge of psychology.
Irony overload.
 

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
Why would that be the case?

Because if no one else can check it, how do you know your own personal biases haven't lead you to a flawed and incorrect conclusion?

No, that would only introduce their biases. Sorry you cannot understand this.

This is a core part of the scientific method. Having people check your work to make sure you haven't made any mistakes is a very good idea.

And stop with your patronizing, "I'm sorry you can't understand this" attitude. The entire scientific community says you are wrong. What is Peer Review? | Wiley

So a person should change their belief that they have determined is true just so they won't be mired? Where would that lead, changing beliefs as the seasons change?

You tell me. You are the one who claimed that me holding the position of atheist since I deconverted from Christianity had left me mired.

They can claim whatever they want but they don't have what Baha'u'llah has to back up their claims.

And they all say that their prophet of choice has stuff that your Mr B doesn't have.

You once again fail to realise that your faith isn't anything special.

It is not a what if for me, it is a what if for you and other nonbelievers.

Oh, please don't tell me you are resorting to Pascal's Wager. that's a really weak argument.

I guess you did not look very far.

People of all religions claim that their holy person of choice has done the things to back up their position, but no one else has. Once again, your belief is nothing special.

That certainly is a choice you can make.

It also has the benefit of fitting all the evidence.
 
Top