JoshuaTree
Flowers are red?
I personally don't believe in a hell, what others may consider hell I consider God's plan. Rejoice!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Love cannot be an attribute, but loving can be an attribute of humans or of God.
So it is more accurate to say God is loving, not that God is love.
Really? So if Ba'hai doctrine (or whatever you call it) says that humans a morally obligated to do X, Y and X, while Bob says that humans X, Y and Z are utterly immoral, then both Bob can go to the Ba'hai version of the afterlife?
It seems to me god isn't particularly logical.
Why would hell be part of God's plan?I personally don't believe in a hell, what others may consider hell I consider God's plan. Rejoice!
Why would hell be part of God's plan?
No.The act of loving in the absence of love is so... Logical.
I'm not sure.
What is the difference between logic and truth?
Logic leads from one point to another within its own self connected system. Truth is a fact. Truth is a location, logic is a map. So if logic is sound and based on truth, all conclusions reached by the logic should be true.
What is the relationship between logic and truth? - Quora
Love cannot be an attribute, but loving can be an attribute of humans or of God.
So it is more accurate to say God is loving, not that God is love.
"God is love " is just dumb.
According to Ba'hai believers there are X, Y and Zs in this life. Ba'hai claim that there are things that humans ought to and ought not do. And they claim that those thing are God's standards. I used X, Y and Z rather than bothering to type out specifics because it didnt matter for my question. If you do not find that to be evident, or understandable; nevermind.There are Xs, Ys, or Zs in the after life? Your response does not make sense. It is God's standards over the millennia that determines the journey of human souls, not an exercise in t]our alphabet.
That's right.An argument can be valid but the conclusion false.
Love is illogical, right?