Ban heterosex!

[Flappycat]

Heterosex has, for too long, plagued our society with unwanted childbirths and an assortment of diseases that spread as a result of heterosexual intercourse, through which the majority of all STD infections are spread. Males and females should, by no means, be allowed to cohabitate, and children should not be put at increased risk of molestation by being placed in the care of parents of the opposite sex. True, this would not be the case with fathers who are naturally homosexual, but the risk is much greater and widespread with children left in the care of parents of the opposite sex and must be brought to an immediate halt. Also, raising children in the care of parents of the opposite sex has potential to cause gender confusion. Little boys may come to believe that they are little girls as a result of being put in the care of women, after all, and the same is probably true of female to male transexuals. The only way to resolve this problem is to treat those who commit heterosex as felons and outlaw heterosexual cohabitation. This is the only way to preserve our society for the long term.

Discuss. I know that this is completely silly, but I'd like to see how far we can go in turning the tables.

 

[michel]

I hate to admit it, but I myself am the product of a heterosex family environment. My father was the typical 'testeronic' male, while my mother was one of those women whose place and purpose was set and dictated by my father.


How could I be anything else than completely confused ? The choice given to me was clear; I could either model myself on a very masculine father (Who refused to allow the display of emotions - emotions were 'a dangerous road down which to walk' - and belonged behind a thick shield, locked in a box that was to remain unopened, or on my Mother, who was a kind and sweet creature, but one who was also subject to hiding feelings.

No wonder I escaped from this clinically sterile environment, and became an over emotional adult. A state of being which I have never managed to rid myself.

 

[nutshell]

Umm... regarding your comment about STDs, empirical evidence shows STDs are more common in homosexuals.

 

[michel]

Umm... regarding your comment about STDs, empirical evidence shows STDs are more common in homosexuals.

Can you provide evidence for that?

 

[SoliDeoGloria]

or why not just go to the point of that one movie with Sylvester Stalone and Sundra Bullock that was set in the future where all they ever had was computer generted sex and had to get special permission to procreate. Sorry, the name of the movie escapes me

Sincerely,
SoliDeoGloria

 

[michel]

or why not just go to the point of that one movie with Sylvester Stalone and Sundra Bullock that was set in the future where all they ever had was computer generted sex and had to get special permission to procreate. Sorry, the name of the movie escapes me

Sincerely,
SoliDeoGloria

Sorry, I am not surw what point you are trying to make.

 

[SoliDeoGloria]

Sorry, I am not surw what point you are trying to make.

What is it with you and missing points I try to get across?!:banghead3

OK, here it is; if we are going to get silly and ban heterosex, why no just ban sex altogether and do it like the movie I mentioned above. (sheesh)

sincerely,
SoliDeoGloria

 

[michel]

What is it with you and missing points I try to get across?!:banghead3

OK, here it is; if we are going to get silly and ban heterosex, why no just ban sex altogether and do it like the movie I mentioned above. (sheesh)

sincerely,
SoliDeoGloria

I am sorry, maybe I am a bit slow on the uptake; I honestly didn't understand the point you were making. I have never seen nor heard of the film you quoted.

 

[Sunstone]

Heterosex is directly responsible for overpopulation.

 

[michel]

Heterosex is directly responsible for overpopulation.

And for making life difficult, if not darned uncomfortable, for homosexuals.

 

[Flappycat]

Umm... regarding your comment about STDs, empirical evidence shows STDs are more common in homosexuals.

Nope! Perhaps this is true if you go by percentages, but the majority of all STD infections, in total, occur as a result of heterosexual intercourse. You can't argue with that!

 

[painted wolf]

not to mention all the crime that Heterosexuals commit... murder, rape, child abuse, spousal abuse... the list is near endless...

wa:do

 

[Yerda]

I heard heterosexuals are really all communists.

 

[jonny]

Heterosex has, for too long, plagued our society with unwanted childbirths and an assortment of diseases that spread as a result of heterosexual intercourse, through which the majority of all STD infections are spread. Males and females should, by no means, be allowed to cohabitate, and children should not be put at increased risk of molestation by being placed in the care of parents of the opposite sex. True, this would not be the case with fathers who are naturally homosexual, but the risk is much greater and widespread with children left in the care of parents of the opposite sex and must be brought to an immediate halt. Also, raising children in the care of parents of the opposite sex has potential to cause gender confusion. Little boys may come to believe that they are little girls as a result of being put in the care of women, after all, and the same is probably true of female to male transexuals. The only way to resolve this problem is to treat those who commit heterosex as felons and outlaw heterosexual cohabitation. This is the only way to preserve our society for the long term.

Discuss. I know that this is completely silly, but I'd like to see how far we can go in turning the tables.

I think sex outside of marriage is wrong. That would solve many of the problems that you have listed above.

 

[Fluffy]

Nope! Perhaps this is true if you go by percentages, but the majority of all STD infections, in total, occur as a result of heterosexual intercourse. You can't argue with that!

Not according this this site:
http://www.avert.org/usastatg.htm

 

[Sunstone]

The whole problem of global overpopulation would be solved if you could just get a significant number of heterosexuals to exercise some self restraint when it comes to breeding. But what are the odds of getting heterosexuals to exercise self restraint? The words "heterosexual" and "self restraint when it comes to breeding" just don't go together.

 

[SoliDeoGloria]

I am sorry, maybe I am a bit slow on the uptake; I honestly didn't understand the point you were making. I have never seen nor heard of the film you quoted.

Well, this isn't the first time you have had that problem so I was starting to wonder if it was a personal thing. Sorry if I came across a bit harsh but I had to sort of find out where you were coming from. Anyways, God has blessed me with a wife who has a talent for movie trivia and she informed me that the name of the movie is "Demolition Man". It's not the best movie in the world but it is something to watch.

Sincerely,
SoliDeoGloria

 

[michel]

Well, this isn't the first time you have had that problem so I was starting to wonder if it was a personal thing. Sorry if I came across a bit harsh but I had to sort of find out where you were coming from. Anyways, God has blessed me with a wife who has a talent for movie trivia and she informed me that the name of the movie is "Demolition Man". It's not the best movie in the world but it is something to watch.

Sincerely,
SoliDeoGloria

I can honestly say it is nothing personal; I am a bit of a recluse, and the only time my wife and I go to see a movie is when we get to win tickets for a pre-screening (on average, we get to see half a dozen films a year). (We are too mean to pay for tickets.)

 

[turk179]

I can honestly say it is nothing personal; I am a bit of a recluse, and the only time my wife and I go to see a movie is when we get to win tickets for a pre-screening (on average, we get to see half a dozen films a year). (We are too mean to pay for tickets.)

I am too poor to pay for tickets. Last time I went to the movies, one ticket cost $9.00 .

I think sex outside of marriage is wrong. That would solve many of the problems that you have listed above.

So the only thing we have to do to solve many of these heterosexual problems is get married? Whoo Hooo.

Personally I think that heterosexuals are out of control. They can get married to whoever they wan't as long as they are of the opposite sex. And its almost imposible to find a straight liberal non Christian these days. They even have their own bars and night clubs now. I swear they have some sort of agenda.:biglaugh: I know, I know. It wouldn't be a silly thread without using the agenda word though .

 

[SoliDeoGloria]

I am too poor to pay for tickets. Last time I went to the movies, one ticket cost $9.00

Talk about way off subject, here we go. BTW Turk179, I noticed that you live in Iowa so let me help you with your movie ticket problems. If you go down Interstate 80 through Des Moines and you take the 86th street exit, then go north a couple blocks, there is a theater on your right hand side called Wynnsong Theater and if you get there before 5 p.m. I believe, all the movies are considered matinee and will cost you 5.25 per ticket. A couple of weeks ago, when we got rained out of work so a couple of us decided to go see the Excorcism of Emily Rose. Where they get you is the price of concessions though. Talk about price gouging, ouch!!!:bonk:

Sincerely.
SoliDeoGloria