Islamaphobes of the world unite!That's a great idea.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Islamaphobes of the world unite!That's a great idea.
It's history. The Hebdo cartoon takes aim at extremists and shows us we have to stand up for our rights and values because their are violent people killing us over them. We can cower in fear and lose our rights to a bunch of people with paper-thin skin (remember, most Muslims aren't becoming violently offended over this and demanding we must cater to their sensitivities).Using the Charlie Hedbo cartoon to 'educate' a bunch of kids was insensitive, provocative, and, first and foremost, wholly unnecessary. So, yes, you should try to avoid ugly slights when reasonably possible, irrespective of the group that you seem so intent upon insulting.
I've been called worse.Islamaphobes of the world unite!
Needless censorship at whims of extremists amd bullies is the ugly slight. Such types should never be catered to, and they should never be given that proverbial inch because they will take a mile.Using the Charlie Hedbo cartoon to 'educate' a bunch of kids was insensitive, provocative, and, first and foremost, wholly unnecessary. So, yes, you should try to avoid ugly slights when reasonably possible, irrespective of the group that you seem so intent upon insulting.
Using the Charlie Hedbo cartoon to 'educate' a bunch of kids was insensitive, provocative, and, first and foremost, wholly unnecessary. So, yes, you should try to avoid ugly slights when reasonably possible, irrespective of the group that you seem so intent upon insulting.
What some of these posters ignore is that this was supposed to be a religious studies class, in a school full of muslims. One might think a bit of sensitivity in order.Using the Charlie Hedbo cartoon to 'educate' a bunch of kids was insensitive, provocative, and, first and foremost, wholly unnecessary. So, yes, you should try to avoid ugly slights when reasonably possible, irrespective of the group that you seem so intent upon insulting.
No doubt you would happily march into a kosher butcher, eating a prawn sandwich, too.That's a great idea. There's actually more than Muhammad who isn't supposed to be portrayed.
It is long past time religious people learn and accept they cannot expect others to conform to something they don't believe in, just as it is wrong of them to expect we face consequences for violating something we do not believe in.
What some of these posters ignore is that this was supposed to be a religious studies class, in a school full of muslims. One might think a bit of sensitivity in order.
Depends. I doubt I'd walk into one restaurant with food from another. I definitely wouldn't do it to walk in and go "yum, this non kosher food is so good!" But if it starts hailing and the kosher butcher shop is closest by to take shelter, well, then I will enter with food another place that is even non-kosher to the place I'm sheltering in.No doubt you would happily march into a kosher butcher, eating a prawn sandwich, too.
Why do you think irreverence towards Muhammad was unnecessary though. What if millions of people where unnecessarily offended by the Jewish religion? Would you demand Jews lay aside their way of life because it might offend millions of people?In my opinion: of course. But my opinion is woefully inadequate grounds for knowingly and unnecessarily insulting millions upon millions of people.
It is a sick, dishonest question worthy of the ignore list.Why do you think irreverence towards Muhammad was unnecessary though.In my opinion: of course. But my opinion is woefully inadequate grounds for knowingly and unnecessarily insulting millions upon millions of people.
Well if you prefer putting people on ignore to informing them so be it, but it was certainly not dishonest, rather it is a question based on an assumed mutual value of the need to hold at bay authoritarianism - which the type of Islam that gets offended at non-adherents displaying images of their Founder quite frankly reeks of.It is a sick, dishonest question worthy of the ignore list.