Oh, okay. I am not a Jehovah's Witness. Oops again.
Me neither.....
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Oh, okay. I am not a Jehovah's Witness. Oops again.
I was raised a Roman Catholic, believing in the trinity. Over the years, I did something nearly unthinkable to a devout Catholic: I studied the Bible! In so doing, it became abundantly clear to me that Jesus is not God and that holy spirit is a thing, not a being.
These things and the fact that Satan rules the Earth, not God are made clear throughout the New Testament. These are basic tenants of Christianity, as per the Bible.
The fact that the JW's have these correct and the mighty Catholic Church has it backwards, lends credence to the JW's message, in my eyes.
I am sorry that you feel that way. Can you point to the Scriptures that you think enforce this belief?
I am glad I feel the way I do! I'm almost 52 years old, I need to get it right pretty quickly!!
Which belief would you like me to address first?
The belief that Jesus is not God. I personally believe that He is God, but I am curious about your belief.
What about this verse?
John 8:58 NASB - Jesus said to them Truly truly I say to - Bible Gateway
Go back a few sentences from what your link quotes:
” 54 Jesus answered: “If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father that glorifies me, he who YOU say is YOUR God; 55 and yet YOU have not known him. But I know him. And if I said I do not know him I should be like YOU, a liar. But I do know him and am observing his word.
I guess we can agree to disagree. I am sorry. I am just not feeling well. Can we continue tomorrow?
The belief that Jesus is not God. I personally believe that He is God, but I am curious about your belief.
Are the 144,000 virgins?
Revelation 14:1-20
1 And I saw, and, look! the Lamb standing upon the Mount Zion, and with him a hundred and forty-four thousand having his name and the name of his Father written on their foreheads. 2 And I heard a sound out of heaven as the sound of many waters and as the sound of loud thunder; and the sound that I heard was as of singers who accompany themselves on the harp playing on their harps. 3 And they are singing as if a new song before the throne and before the four living creatures and the elders; and no one was able to master that song but the hundred and forty-four thousand, who have been bought from the earth. 4 These are the ones that did not defile themselves with women; in fact, they are virgins.
What about this verse?
John 8:58
in the hebrew scriptures, when Isreal became involved with false religion, God called them Adulterers and spoke of them as having illicit relations with a 'foreign god'.
Eze 23:5 And O‧ho′lah began to prostitute herself, while subject to me, and kept lusting after those passionately loving her, after the As‧syr′i‧ans, ...8 And her prostitutions [carried] from Egypt she did not leave, for with her they had lain down in her youth, and they were the ones that pressed the bosoms of her virginity and they kept pouring out their immoral intercourse upon her.
James 4:4 shows a similar attitude regarding loyalty to God. He likens those who become friends of the world, as adulteresses:
"Adulteresses, do YOU not know that the friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever, therefore, wants to be a friend of the world is constituting himself an enemy of God"
So we take the verse in revelation to mean that the 144,000 chosen ones did not become involved in false religious practices, they kept themselves spiritually clean and undefiled, in a spiritual sense they are virgins.
And we know it is not speaking about literal virginity because some of Christs Apostles were married men with families. It was his chosen apostles who were the first ones selected to be among the group who would rule with Christ in heaven... and that is what the 144,000 are...the one who will rule as kings and priests with Christ. So it cannot be speaking about literal virginity.
One other question: If Jesus has been ruling since 1914
and
the slave is "co-ruling" with him
is there communicaton between them?
I'm having trouble with this.
4 These are the ones that did not defile themselves with women; in fact, they are virgins.
That John threw in the "with women" makes it hard to believe it was figurative and not literal.
If one is not a virgin, that does not mean he is an adulterer.
Why should we take the "144,000" literally and not the "virgin" part literally?
I appreciate your input.
I'm having trouble with this.
4 These are the ones that did not defile themselves with women; in fact, they are virgins.
That John threw in the "with women" makes it hard to believe it was figurative and not literal.
If one is not a virgin, that does not mean he is an adulterer.
Why should we take the "144,000" literally and not the "virgin" part literally?
I appreciate your input.
Who is part of the first or earlier resurrection of Revelation 20v6; 5 vs9,10; and 14v4 ?
Since they are resurrected first or earlier than others, then like the resurrected Jesus they have direct communication with Jesus.
The rest of Jesus 'brothers' [Matthew 25v40] that are still alive on earth at the time of Matthew [25v31] will not have that direct communication, so to speak, before Jesus messianic [1000-year] reign over earthly subjects. Psalm 72v8.
According to Ephesians [5v23] Christ is the head of the Christian congregation.Uhhhh.... is that a yes or a no?