Its pretty clear that the long ending was added later. Quran is not needed for that.
So if Effendi is not sure about the Bible, how come you said that all scriptures are gods word?
I really cant understand.
The Word of God is in all scriptures but not every word can be said to be exactly what the Prophet said. Only from the Quran onwards is ‘each and every Word’ the Word of God. Before the Quran, in substance the other scriptures are also the Word of God but not authenticated. Some were passed down orally, some written down after the passing of the Prophet and some recorded hundreds of years later.
In these cases we can only accept as the Word of God that which agrees with the authenticated scriptures we have.
Another example. In 1Samuel 15 God supposedly tells Saul to slaughter all the men women, children and babies. Author? Unknown. It was written well after Samuel died. How can we accept God would order genocide? . Was this a revelation from God? The Quran and Baha’i scriptures contradict this completely. God is just but deplores murder. So the story is not the Word of God and recorded well after the event.
The Bahá'ís believe that God's Revelation is under His care and protection and that the essence, or essential elements, of what His Manifestations intended to convey has been recorded and preserved in Their Holy Books. However, as the sayings of the ancient Prophets were written down some time later, we cannot categorically state, as we do in the case of the Writings of Bahá'u'lláh, that the words and phrases attributed to Them are Their exact words. (Effendi)
In a Bible, Abdul-Baha wrote these words.
THIS book is the Holy Book of God, of celestial Inspiration. It is the Bible of Salvation, the Noble Gospel. It is the mystery of the Kingdom and its light. It is the Divine Bounty, the sign of the guidance of God.
When 'Abdu'l-Bahá states we believe what is in the Bible, He means in substance. Not that we believe every word of it to be taken literally or that every word is the authentic saying of the Prophet. (Effendi)
It’s not black and white so there is flexibility with this matter. If I didn’t explain it clearly that’s my mistake. Scriptures ‘before’ the Quran can be said to be the unauthenticated Word of God ‘in essence’ but only from the Quran onwards can scripture be considered the exact Words revealed by God as these were recorded in the lifetime of the Prophet and verified.
It’s the same with Hadiths. The Quran says Muhammad is an example to humanity. But if a hadith portrays Him negatively it is false and incorrect because the authoritative texts trumps unauthentic texts.
Last edited: