Biblical Archaeology.

[ImmortalFlame]

Whats it feel like flame?

Again, I wouldn't know.

How does it feel to have to ignore every single argument that renders your logic entirely fallacious, such as in the majority of the posts in this thread?

 

[mickiel]

Whats it feel like Flame, to contend with that which you do not understand?

Tell me how it feels to see your foundation shaken.

And then let me know when the lambs stop singing in your mind.

Peace.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

Whats it feel like Flame, to contend with that which you do not understand?

Speaking of which, do you understand how analogies work yet and how they demonstrate the inherent flaw in your logic?

Tell me how it feels to see your foundation shaken.

And then let me know when the lambs stop singing in your mind.

Who do you think you are? Hannibal Lecter?

 

[mickiel]

Speaking of which, do you understand how analogies work yet and how they demonstrate the inherent flaw in your logic?


Who do you think you are? Hannibal Lecter?

I can see the lambs singing in your desire to contain me, your need to rail me in. Like a fish you can't catch, you now need to reel me in.

Whats it feel like Flame?

Peace.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

I can see the lambs singing in your desire to contain me, your need to rail me in. Like a fish you can't catch, you now need to reel me in.

Whats it feel like Flame?

Mickiel, this is pathetic. Even for you.

 

[fallingblood]

I have no faith, and theres nowhere on this board you can pull up me ever saying so.

And I have loved this debate, stomping on the useless rebuttals I have received. There has been no rebuttals that prove anything I have posted is not human history.

Whats it feel like Blood, knowing that your belief is ungrounded?

Peace.

I will tell you as soon as you offer up a rebuttal to what I've said in this thread.

 

[mickiel]

I will tell you as soon as you offer up a rebuttal to what I've said in this thread.

Thats the thing, you have not said anything worth a rebuttal.

Nothing at all of value.

Peace.

 

[sojourner]

You missed the point. No one is stating that there is some historical facts in the Bible. That is expected. We see that to be true in any number of fictional stories. The same is true for any number of fictional movies even. Just because they contain some actual truth does not mean they are correct in all though.

I've already shown where the Bible has been incorrect. There are many instances that there is no evidence for a variety of stories. There is no found Garden of Eden. There is no found walls of Jericho. There was no Noah ark, and no evidence for any global flood. There is no evidence for the supposed creation story. There is no evidence that Herod the Great Massacred infants in order to try to kill Jesus. There no evidence that Moses, Abraham, or many other of the prophets existed. Even the formation of the nation of Israel does no coincide with what the Bible states. When it all comes down, there are countless examples of where the Bible is incorrect.

A couple of examples of where the Bible is correct means absolutely nothing. Fiction uses the same exact tools.

there's also no evidence for a mass invasion of Canaan by Hebrews...

 

[mickiel]

there's also no evidence for a mass invasion of Canaan by Hebrews...

How about a rebuttal of the evidence I have given.

Peace.

 

[mickiel]

Mickiel, this is pathetic. Even for you.

And your constant hounding of me is not pathetic?

Peace.

 

[fallingblood]

Thats the thing, you have not said anything worth a rebuttal.

Nothing at all of value.

Peace.

So you are contradicting yourself now. You said that you love stomping out the rebuttals but then when someone calls you on it, they haven't made any rebuttals then.

I've shown you where the Bible has been wrong in many cases dealing with archeology. I've shown why your argument is flawed from the beginning. I've shown why you are just wrong all together, and you've never had a rebuttal. I don't think you've offered any rebuttal to anyone yet. Why not just admit that you are afraid to actually debate this subject.

 

[mickiel]

I've shown you where the Bible has been wrong in many cases dealing with archeology. I've shown why your argument is flawed from the beginning. I've shown why you are just wrong all together, and you've never had a rebuttal. I don't think you've offered any rebuttal to anyone yet. Why not just admit that you are afraid to actually debate this subject.

You have shown no such thing. Show me where anything I posted as archaeological finds, are false finds.

Peace.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

And your constant hounding of me is not pathetic?

You mean, me reacting to things you've said? That's not hounding, that's me expressing disagreement on an issue.

On the other hand, refusing to acknowledge somebody's arguments and instead making childish attempts to frighten them or allude to you "getting in their head" is pathetic. And that's all you can really do.

 

[fallingblood]

You have shown no such thing. Show me where anything I posted as archaeological finds, are false finds.

Peace.

What was your goal and purpose, as stated in the first post you made? That is what I've shown to be incorrect.

 

[gnostic]

ImmortalFlame made some points, but your refusal to reply to his comments, by evasion and misdirection and distraction, clearly show that you have no wish to debate with anyone.

And in your other thread about respect (Why is debate spoiled by disrespect?), you've evaded questions and fail to address their points and then you're wondering why there are no respect for you?

You've have raised issues, and people here counter your issues, and you should counter their or at the very least address the questions they have raised. If you're right then good for you, but if you are wrong, then you should at least acknowledge it. That would be a debate.

If someone criticize your points, then try to look at it from their perspectives. Better yet learn from what any of us might teach you. Because clearly you don't understand the nature of archaeology or history, judging by the many flawed claims you've made. View the criticism as constructive criticism, and simply learn from what we have to say.

Your method (including evasions) have so far alienated or offended many of us here, who had contribute this thread of yours, and that's no way to earn our respects, mickiel.

 

[mickiel]

What was your goal and purpose, as stated in the first post you made? That is what I've shown to be incorrect.

You have shown how your mind thinks it has shown something, when it has shown nothing.

Dispute the evidence already given and quit evading that.

Peace.

 

[mickiel]

Your method (including evasions) have so far alienated or offended many of us here, who had contribute this thread of yours, and that's no way to earn our respects, mickiel.

Take your respect and stuff it in the thing that blinds you from the truth in what I say.

Peace.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

Take your respect and stuff it in the thing that blinds you from the truth in what I say.

What a perfectly rational, sensible and respectful person you are.

 

[mickiel]

What a perfectly rational, sensible and respectful person you are.

That guy is full of bull, just as you are. Both of you are classic examples of people who cannot be reasoned with. Wells without water, minds stuck on themselves, and you persue me because you know that I know this about you.

There can be no respect with your kind, only a message of your self.

Something I refuse to do.

Peace.

 

[mickiel]

That guy is full of bull, just as you are. Both of you are classic examples of people who cannot be reasoned with. Wells without water, minds stuck on themselves, and you persue me because you know that I know this about you.

There can be no respect with your kind, only a message of your self.

Something I refuse to do.

Peace.

And let me tell you somethingelse Flame, I have debated you most of this year. When I extended respect to you, you eventually dogged that and became rude. I even forgave that twice, and you still kept it up. So you may give the illusion that it is me who is disrespectful, but you know that I know its really you.

But yet listen, I'll forgive you even a third time, and will debate you again. Because I see in your determination at least something I can honor.

Now then, post your disagreement and proof against any Archaeology that I have listed.

Peace.