Me Myself
Back to my username
I wouldn't rely upon Quiddity's source to do that.
About the question of whether it was one woman who went to the tomb or more than one, the site says as many such do, "Well, just because the names of only one or two are given doesn't mean that there couldn't have been more unnamed women with them. One gospel says Mary Magdalene and the other Mary, and another possibly indicates that there were other women with them."
So, let's say we're friends, and I tell you that our mutual friend Sarah drove her car to New York City yesterday and got there at 1:00 for lunch at the Tavern on the Green. She could have had a car full of passengers. That might be the case. I just neglected to mention or didn't know there were others with her. Later, you meet up with another friend who tells you that Steve, Mike and Cindi went to the Tavern on the Green for lunch yesterday at about 1:00. So, they were probably Sarah's passengers and had lunch with her. Even if you know that Steve is Sarah's boyfriend, that doesn't mean he went with Sarah and the others or that the four met there for lunch. Sarah might have been going there to have lunch with her aunt. That's how this stuff works when you can't for some reason ask Sarah (or Mary Magdalene in the case of this biblical contradiction) if anyone else was with her.
This is how "maybe" and "possibly" are often used to excuse away biblical contradictions.
Not enough at all. The passages dirfectly say information that contradicts one another.
Like in one, they tell noo one that the tomb was empty. (in mark) In the others, they do. Tghe contradictions are too big for "maybes" or "probably"s to be fitting.
Still, no explanation given, so this thread is a failure until good explanation is given.