tomato1236
Ninja Master
That's it. We're going bigfoot huntin.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
PW covered this already but c'mon Outhouse! It's not a hoax but a misinterpretation of black bears! It's pretty obvious...check out jacobs creature. its not much but its not been proven a hoax.
Not a hoax, just an all to common misidentification by people who want to believe more than they want to investigate. And who don't have enough anatomy and biology knowledge to tell a bear from an ape. (which can be tricky if you don't know bear anatomy... police get fooled by bear carcasses pretty regularly, assuming they are human.)you know it was posted by hunters not people looking for BF
imnot sure it was a mangy bear lol looks more like a chimp.
I agree theres not enough proof there other then to call it the typical blobsquatch.
its not a hoax though
You might be doing it a favor... mange is a tragic illness that can kill, and makes life miserable in the meantime.Man, I want to destroy that bald bear!
Maybe so, but when I saw it I just wanted to run up and attack it with lots of weapons.You might be doing it a favor... mange is a tragic illness that can kill, and makes life miserable in the meantime.
wa:do
So, either it's a midget bigfoot
ps. Black bears make whistling and hooting noises. Especially when disturbed.
Black bears are also known to follow/track humans.
Absolutely... if people sought Uktena despite every story warning of it's deadly nature and Grizzly bears despite their aggressive unpredictability and even other humans... people would have something from Bigfoot to.If bigfoot exists or existed, rest assured that it would have been killed by someone at some point in history. Pioneers ran across all sorts of beasties on the American frontier and certainly they put bullet holes in all of them. Native Americans wouldn't have Sasquatch legends...they'd have incorporated their actual hand bones and skulls into their rituals...hunting a bigfoot would have been a right of passage for young men or something.
Absolutely... if people sought Uktena despite every story warning of it's deadly nature and Grizzly bears despite their aggressive unpredictability and even other humans... people would have something from Bigfoot to.
I paused it frame-by-frame. Defintely has arms and definitely moved.
I paused it frame-by-frame. Defintely has arms and definitely moved.
Awesome. What a babe.
Why not fake a female? If everyone expects a fake macho male, a female adds credibility.
wa:do
Sorry I don't share your faith.most people dont pick a sex for a hoax. the cotume at that time was hard enough let alone add breast
no one, no one has been able to duplicate what was done in 67 and no one has been able to prove it a hoax. I had breakfast next to the man in willow creek. He will atest on his deathbed he believes what he saw %100
in the film, you can see muscles that exactly match those that it would take to support the weight MOVE. in the digitil pics you can see the areolas on the breast.
You know since 67 no one has done a search as good as patterson and gimlin since then.
A human cant even walk that way. The gate was put through some strict analysis like they do with golfers. the gate also matches that of a heavy creature.
in the patterson footprints, the toes move from track to track, in places the track went down 3-4 inches and a 275lb man next to them sunk a 1/2". the midtarsel break moved from track to track.
that is real undisputed footage of a real BF
Sorry I don't share your faith
First, the "breasts" can easily be an artifact of the light and filming conditions
why are there no shadows on the soles of the feet
They can't even identify a bear with mange.