• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bully XL ban

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
I can't see how that should be a problem, as long as it's within an individual property. I was thinking of more urban areas where there's a higher population density. On farms, out in the country, it's a much lower risk. But even then, it would still be on the owners to keep their dogs from menacing their neighbors.

It's the implementation of these sorts of restrictions though that bothers me. These laws often have broad reaching effects. If something like this got passed in my State's county it would cover both two large urban communities and several farming / small mountain communities.

And I think that this isn't uncommon in a lot of places.
 
And I imagine that the worst owners will continue to own the largest and most dangerous dogs available. So why not just head off future incidents and ban all large powerful dogs?

I imagine there is a balance that can be found.

A 60kg xl bully is more of a threat than a 40kg Alsatian.

The most dangerous dogs should be banned, then the next tier should have more stringent ownership requirements and be muzzled and kept on a short leash in public areas.

But to ban something merely because it can be said to be “more dangerous to humans” than something else, seems very shortsighted.

Why would that be the case?

That’s probably the single biggest reasons we ban anything.

It’s why you can buy fireworks but not hand grenades.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
Yes, it's true that pit bulls have a powerful bite and can rip someone's face off. But then again, if someone pours a bucket of piranha into the kiddie pool, then there will be severe injuries and possible deaths, but it ultimately depends on the actions or inactions of humans for injury or death to occur. Humans would be responsible for the outcome.
 
It's the implementation of these sorts of restrictions though that bothers me. These laws often have broad reaching effects. If something like this got passed in my State's county it would cover both two large urban communities and several farming / small mountain communities.

And I think that this isn't uncommon in a lot of places.

In your opinion, what would be the reason someone in a farming community specifically needed an xl bully, as opposed to another breed?

Exemptions could be granted in certain cases of specific need.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
Make every dog owner take the AKC canine good citizen training and test.


I've got a very active, smart, high orey drive hunting/herding breed. He is an Aussie Shep/GSP cross. I've done this training with him, (as well as others). He is better behaved in public then most children.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
In your opinion, what would be the reason someone in a farming community specifically needed an xl bully, as opposed to another breed?

Exemptions could be granted in certain cases of specific need.

Up here we have cougars, bears, and other large animals that a bully would be great at warding off. They also make good herding dogs (yes they can be trained to herd), they are fast and like to run.

There is no reason to ever ban a breed. Ever. The owner needs to take full responsibility for the actual training required of owning a dog, the actual hours of work involved in safely owning an animal that is descended from wolves.

 

Curious George

Veteran Member
I imagine there is a balance that can be found.

A 60kg xl bully is more of a threat than a 40kg Alsatian.

The most dangerous dogs should be banned, then the next tier should have more stringent ownership requirements and be muzzled and kept on a short leash in public areas.



Why would that be the case?

That’s probably the single biggest reasons we ban anything.

It’s why you can buy fireworks but not hand grenades.
Yet fireworks are more dangerous than kazoos. Your logic would call for banning fireworks too.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
That doesn’t really address any of my questions or statements. That other dog breeds have been “banned” doesn’t impact whether banning is reasonable, or the best way to address the issue. In fact, that the list needs to be expanded seems to indicate that the list didn’t solve the issue in the first place.
But aren't the XL Bully a new breed?
There have been about 15 deaths since about 2020 attributed to XL Bullies, that is over 50% of dog fatalities. They are a dangerous and unpredictable breed, they are no cocker-poo or Labrador.
 

Eddi

Christianity, Taoism, and Humanism
Premium Member
But aren't the XL Bully a new breed?
There have been about 15 deaths since about 2020 attributed to XL Bullies, that is over 50% of dog fatalities. They are a dangerous and unpredictable breed, they are no cocker-poo or Labrador.
Yes, and how many people have been savaged by a greyhound!
 

Eddi

Christianity, Taoism, and Humanism
Premium Member
The bus or the dog?
The dog!

This is my greyhound

20231211_132842.jpg

They make lovely companions, very placid, gentle, and affectionate
 

Secret Chief

Very strong language
I imagine there is a balance that can be found.

A 60kg xl bully is more of a threat than a 40kg Alsatian.

The most dangerous dogs should be banned, then the next tier should have more stringent ownership requirements and be muzzled and kept on a short leash in public areas.



Why would that be the case?

That’s probably the single biggest reasons we ban anything.

It’s why you can buy fireworks but not hand grenades.
Don't get me started on ******* fireworks.
 

Eddi

Christianity, Taoism, and Humanism
Premium Member
They are good, rescue greyhounds can be very nervous and not good around people, but not dangerous.
We've had numerous rescue greyhounds and they have all been excellent with people

They have had very deprived lives so are most appreciative of a loving home
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
Friendliness: XL American Bullies are known for their friendly and outgoing nature. They are typically social with people and other animals, making them great family pets.

Loyalty: XL American Bullies are known for their unwavering loyalty to their owners. They are protective of their family members and will go to great lengths to keep them safe.

Trainability: XL American Bullies are intelligent and eager to please, making them easy to train. However, like any breed, they require consistent and positive training methods to ensure their behavior stays on track.

Energy Level: XL American Bullies are a high-energy breed and require daily exercise to stay healthy and happy. They enjoy activities like long walks, hiking, and playtime in the yard.

Aggression: While XL American Bullies are often portrayed as aggressive, this is typically not the case. Proper socialization and early training can help prevent aggressive behavior, but it’s important to note that individual dogs may have different temperaments.

Separation Anxiety: XL American Bullies can be prone to separation anxiety if left alone for long periods of time. To keep your XL American Bully from engaging in destructive behavior and ensure good mental health, offer enough exercise and mental stimulation.


Know what it takes to own a specific breed and you won't have any issues.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
We've had numerous rescue greyhounds and they have all been excellent with people

They have had very deprived lives so are most appreciative of a loving home
I've never had one but know people who have; some of them could not be let off the lead and would be aggressive with other dogs. BUT I have no problem with them.
 

Eddi

Christianity, Taoism, and Humanism
Premium Member
I've never had one but know people who have; some of them could not be let off the lead and would be aggressive with other dogs. BUT I have no problem with them.
They have a very high prey drive, that's the issue so if they see anything then they're off!

Plus ex-racers have basically been trained to run after things

Greyhounds make good first dogs, they are weird creatures and there is no shortage of them

When they are happy they chatter their teeth
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
Than I anticipate that you would be in favor of greatly expanding the ban list on an ongoing basis each time a different breed kills or maims a human.
In the UK the ban includes a number of such breeds.. and dangerous dogs of any breed.
Owners of such dangerous dogs who harm people can find themselves in prison. And fined. And be banned for ever owning dogs again.
 
Top