If you hate the guy, he must have something going for him. He must have irked Miss Thunberg and Mr. Soros. Maybe you will own nothing and be happier for it? You may soon find out.Cool, more misogyny! Lemme guess, you're an Andrew Tate fan.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If you hate the guy, he must have something going for him. He must have irked Miss Thunberg and Mr. Soros. Maybe you will own nothing and be happier for it? You may soon find out.Cool, more misogyny! Lemme guess, you're an Andrew Tate fan.
She hasn't proved she "loves sex", she has only shown that she is obsessed with it. I expect her only companionship comes in the form of sexually named pets.I love when you refute someone's arguments and then they just go on making them again. Hilarious.
People who "love sex" can't be sexually assaulted everyone! @2ndpillar has it all figured out! You heard it here first folks!
It's the word I used. Only people who don't know how to respectfully interact with women (and all humans, really) should be afraid of the #MeToo movement."Scared" is not the word I would use. Concerned would be the word any man should be around a Me-Too woman, of the woman libber persuasion. Even a man married to a Me-Too woman should be concerned. If they should be so lucky to escape such an entanglement, they should not stop running until they are well into the mid-west states. The scales of New York justice system are weighted on the side of women, whether they are nuttier than a cross eyed squirrel, or not. The "woke" culture has been exposed for what they are, and reasonable men will walk a wide path away from such persons. Don't expect to get another bite at the apple, even in a country which elected Trudeau twice. Some people are just slow learners, but possibly they have learned from their mistakes.
Who cares? Couldn't be more irrelevant if you tried.She hasn't proved she "loves sex", she has only shown that she is obsessed with it. I expect her only companionship comes in the form of sexually named pets.
He spouts the same misogynistic garbage you're sharing here. You sound like one of his disciples.If you hate the guy, he must have something going for him. He must have irked Miss Thunberg and Mr. Soros. Maybe you will own nothing and be happier for it? You may soon find out.
I'm here to call him out.My advice: don't engage with 2ndpillar. He just wants to offend people. I have him on "ignore" and recommend that you do so also. If nobody engages with him, maybe (hopefully) he will just go away.
It seems Tate became embroiled in controversy once he disparaged Ms. Thunberg, who is the prophet of the "Woke" green movement, subsidized by Soros, and whose god is the self-proclaimed creator of the Internet, a Mr. Al Gore. It was the U.S. Embassy, an arm of Biden, which made a call to the Romanians mouthing criminality by Mr. Tate. There has been no trial, nor is he still in custody. It was John Kerry, a green climate comrade of Al Gore, who was a past Secretary of State, and head of the embassies. Al Gore was a recent green Czar of the Biden administration, until it came out his family had their own private jet, which he initially lied about before Congress, which apparently was a carbon polluter, which would put Thunberg to shame. In the end, the lesson learned, was Tate should have recycled his pizza carton, and saved a lot of time and money. Apparently, you have a different narrative you are trying to push. In the U.S., a man is innocent until proven guilty. Apparently, listening to you, that isn't the criteria in Canada. Apparently, with Tate agreeing with his Islam religion, that a woman belongs to her husband, you think he should be put in jail. As Paul thinks that a woman is subject to her husband, once your husband is free of your bond, well your pool of available men will be limited to a very small area. In China, the rich have as many girlfriends as they can get away with. In India, the religious rule has been in the past to burn the wives with the husband at death. They seem to subjugate the wife to the husband.He spouts the same misogynistic garbage you're sharing here. You sound like one of his disciples.
He's currently up on charges for human trafficking. I'm sure some stupid woman is just lying or something.
Oh boy, another deeply convoluted conspiracy theory!It seems Tate became embroiled in controversy once he disparaged Ms. Thunberg, who is the prophet of the "Woke" green movement, subsidized by Soros, and whose god is the self-proclaimed creator of the Internet, a Mr. Al Gore. It was the U.S. Embassy, an arm of Biden, which made a call to the Romanians mouthing criminality by Mr. Tate. There has been no trial, nor is he still in custody. It was John Kerry, a green climate comrade of Al Gore, who was a past Secretary of State, and head of the embassies. Al Gore was a recent green Czar of the Biden administration, until it came out his family had their own private jet, which he initially lied about before Congress, which apparently was a carbon polluter, which would put Thunberg to shame. In the end, the lesson learned, was Tate should have recycled his pizza carton, and saved a lot of time and money. Apparently, you have a different narrative you are trying to push. In the U.S., a man is innocent until proven guilty. Apparently, listening to you, that isn't the criteria in Canada. Apparently, with Tate agreeing with his Islam religion, that a woman belongs to her husband, you think he should be put in jail. As Paul thinks that a woman is subject to her husband, once your husband is free of your bond, well your pool of available men will be limited to a very small area. In China, the rich have as many girlfriends as they can get away with. In India, the religious rule has been in the past to burn the wives with the husband at death. They seem to subjugate the wife to the husband.
Gore boasted: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."
The Mother of Gore's Invention
Humphrey Bogart never said, "Play it again, Sam," and Al Gore never said, "I invented the Internet." But both guys said similar things that took on lives of their own. By Declan McCullagh.www.wired.com
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck. The complaint to Albania, was initiated by the U.S. embassy. Sounds up and up to me. Oh Yeah, one your black woman DEI judges from Georgia just got convicted of gross incompetence. Putting incompetent judges and prosecutors in the courts aren't helping anyone. And in general, as in the case of Tate, he is not considered a criminal until he is convicted. As for Trump's "conviction", that was with respect to a civil case, where the evidence required is less than that required for a criminal case, and will be reviewed by another court, and hopefully reversed, leaving you with egg on your face.Oh boy, another deeply convoluted conspiracy theory!
We definitely need more of those.
All of this Gish Galloping nonsense just to make excuses for terrible behaviour.
I've got a better idea - stop supporting criminals.
Great response when someone points out you're pushing baseless conspiracies. Just claim it walks and talks like a duck and voila, you're magically right now! LOL Oh and you threw in some racism for good measure. Nice work.If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck. The complaint to Albania, was initiated by the U.S. embassy. Sounds up and up to me. Oh Yeah, one your black woman DEI judges from Georgia just got convicted of gross incompetence. Putting incompetent judges and prosecutors in the courts aren't helping anyone.
Just came here to highlight the absurdity of what you've said here.And in general, as in the case of Tate, he is not considered a criminal until he is convicted.
As for Trump's "conviction", that was with respect to a civil case, where the evidence required is less than that required for a criminal case, and will be reviewed by another court, and hopefully reversed, leaving you with egg on your face.
I didn't conjure up a conspiracy theory. I stated the historical facts, and hocus pocus, you came up with the conspiracy theory. As for your DEI narrative, it is Marxist in nature, and injustice, poverty, incompetency, and wailing women are the results. The latest failure in DEI is Mayorkas (Cuban), not that the Senate will do anything, or that he is incompetent in doing what he set out to do, but that he has failed to follow U.S. Law.Great response when someone points out you're pushing baseless conspiracies. Just claim it walks and talks like a duck and voila, you're magically right now! LOL Oh and you threw in some racism for good measure. Nice work.
He can't be rehabilitated. Some people are on forums just to write outrageous garbage.I'm here to call him out.
Apparently, in a Me Too setting, a man is guilty anytime a woman imputes a crime against them. That is going to make women a hot potato, that no one will go around. Your husband must be walking on eggshells. A hell of a life for him. As for a New York Court, that votes generally 2:1 Democratic, and lives under a Me Too umbrella, no real evidence is necessary to convict a man charged by a woman. As for convicting Trump of disparaging E. Carroll of being crazy, well, in most places you can't be convicted for telling the truth. As time marches on, and the media and the elite experts are more or less discredited, a lot of New Yorkers are realizing that Trump is their ally and not their enemy, and any political judicial war against him may not succeed, even in a historically democratic setting. The democrats will probably have to set up something of a black swan event to try and rig any election, because I am thinking their criminal proceedings are not going to wind up as they wish. E. Carrroll has her mice, cat, and dog, but what will you have when the Me Too crowd undermine their own platform? If she is sued by Trump, with regard to her video saying the rape was not sexual, will likely cost her around 80 million dollars, plus attorney fees. Not that there was any interaction to start with.1. Innocent until proven guilty. Not a criminal until convicted.
2. Trump found liable for fraud, sexual abuse and defamation in a civil court by judge and jury. Still innocent. Didn't do anything wrong at all. Witch hunt! It's all going to be reversed someday.
The forums are here for you to refute what I have said via counter proofs, not by throwing stones at me. Directly attaching me is generally a proof that you have no arguments to the contrary to what I have presented.He can't be rehabilitated. Some people are on forums just to write outrageous garbage.
No, that was you.I didn't conjure up a conspiracy theory. I stated the historical facts, and hocus pocus, you came up with the conspiracy theory.
And now you've Gish Galloped off into another tangent and you're just parroting far-right-wing talking points.As for your DEI narrative, it is Marxist in nature, and injustice, poverty, incompetency, and wailing women are the results. The latest failure in DEI is Mayorkas (Cuban), not that the Senate will do anything, or that he is incompetent in doing what he set out to do, but that he has failed to follow U.S. Law.
I'm not trying to rehabilitate him. I'm calling him out on his sexist and racist assertions.He can't be rehabilitated. Some people are on forums just to write outrageous garbage.
LOL You're psychologically projecting.Apparently, in a Me Too setting, a man is guilty anytime a woman imputes a crime against them. That is going to make women a hot potato, that no one will go around. Your husband must be walking on eggshells. A hell of a life for him.
And yet evidence was presented and Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in a court of law. The man is guilty.As for a New York Court, that votes generally 2:1 Democratic, and lives under a Me Too umbrella, no real evidence is necessary to convict a man charged by a woman.
Nope, it's called defamation. Trump has been found liable for doing it. Twice now in this one case.As for convicting Trump of disparaging E. Carroll of being crazy, well, in most places you can't be convicted for telling the truth.
Trump and his co-conspirators are the only ones who have tried to rig an election. The last one.As time marches on, and the media and the elite experts are more or less discredited, a lot of New Yorkers are realizing that Trump is their ally and not their enemy, and any political judicial war against him may not succeed, even in a historically democratic setting. The democrats will probably have to set up something of a black swan event to try and rig any election
Trump is currently sleeping through his criminal proceeding in New York. Good start for him, eh? LOL, because I am thinking their criminal proceedings are not going to wind up as they wish. E. Carrroll has her mice, cat, and dog, but what will you have when the Me Too crowd undermine their own platform?
LOL You think he can sue her for saying "rape was not sexual?" How?If she is sued by Trump, with regard to her video saying the rape was not sexual, will likely cost her around 80 million dollars, plus attorney fees.
Oh, it's been determined in a court of law that there was, in fact, an interaction. It's been adjudicated. You don't get to say there wasn't.Not that there was any interaction to start with.
There are strong independent women, but they won't need DEI to get through life, and they don't consider themselves woman libs, and among the Progressive "woke", and they don't have a platform of complaints. Here is another DEI strong black woman who was declared the worst judge in Illinois. 'America's Worst Mayor': Illinois Democrat Accused of Covering Up Sexual Assault, Firing Victim Did you hear about the Toronto housing bubble might bust this year, indicated by the Toronto food bank use being up around 100%, and the 1.1 million average house price tags being a bit high, when full time workers can't afford their food costs. Apparently, Progressive programs bring about Marxist results. Progressive NY, Portland, Chicago, and San Francisco can try and call on the federal government to bail them out, but the Canadian federal government does not have anything in their coffers, and food bank use is way up across Canada. Just because your husband is in no position to complain about you, doesn't mean he is happy about his position. Men, even weak men, generally tend to keep their misfortunes to themselves, and they don't like change. Their only hope is the wife divorces them, without making false charges. It is better to live in an attic with a piece of bread, than to live in the house of a nagging woman (Proverbs 21:9.No where in your response did you come anywhere close to speaking to the point. You've just engaged in more woman bashing and repetition of your previous claims.
The point is that you come across as a Progressive DEI woman lib Marxist, who creates their own problems, and problems for others. Oh yeah, did I mention that the last DEI black woman Supreme court justice appointee apparently never read the 1st amendment, or at least has no idea of its context. Here is another election manipulation, whereas illegal migrants are urged to vote for Biden to keep the border open, which is only possible if voter ID is kept verboten. Not that you care, but when Canada fails, where are you going to flee if the U.S. fails?No, that was you.
And now you've Gish Galloped off into another tangent and you're just parroting far-right-wing talking points.
Why can't you ever stay on topic or address a single point?
Then you haven't made your point. I'm certainly not a Marxist. LOLThe point is that you come across as a Progressive DEI woman lib Marxist, who creates their own problems, and problems for others.
Thanks for reinforcing my above points with this screed.Oh yeah, did I mention that the last DEI black woman Supreme court justice appointee apparently never read the 1st amendment, or at least has no idea of its context. Here is another election manipulation, whereas illegal migrants are urged to vote for Biden to keep the border open, which is only possible if voter ID is kept verboten.
Not that you care, but when Canada fails, where are you going to flee if the U.S. fails?
Mayorkas Grilled Over Alleged Flyers Asking Migrants to Vote for Biden
DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was grilled over an alleged flyer asking migrants to vote for President Joe Biden in November.www.breitbart.com