• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

By the way -- if you claim to be a Christian...

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
I love when you refute someone's arguments and then they just go on making them again. Hilarious.

People who "love sex" can't be sexually assaulted everyone! @2ndpillar has it all figured out! You heard it here first folks!:rolleyes:
She hasn't proved she "loves sex", she has only shown that she is obsessed with it. I expect her only companionship comes in the form of sexually named pets.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
"Scared" is not the word I would use. Concerned would be the word any man should be around a Me-Too woman, of the woman libber persuasion. Even a man married to a Me-Too woman should be concerned. If they should be so lucky to escape such an entanglement, they should not stop running until they are well into the mid-west states. The scales of New York justice system are weighted on the side of women, whether they are nuttier than a cross eyed squirrel, or not. The "woke" culture has been exposed for what they are, and reasonable men will walk a wide path away from such persons. Don't expect to get another bite at the apple, even in a country which elected Trudeau twice. Some people are just slow learners, but possibly they have learned from their mistakes.
It's the word I used. Only people who don't know how to respectfully interact with women (and all humans, really) should be afraid of the #MeToo movement.
Don't sexually harass people and you won't get called out on it. It's not that complicated.

By the way, pretty much every woman you have or will come into contact with in your life has been sexually harassed/abused/assaulted in some form or another. That's like, the entire point of the #MeToo movement - to point out how rampant and widespread such behaviour has been for pretty much the entire course of human history, and put an end to it. To say we've had enough of it. We've had enough of your misogynistic comments too, where you further victimize victims of sexual assault and abuse by attempting to impugn their character and by calling them "crazy" and presuming that anyone complaining about sexual abuse is a money-grubbing liar, whose just out to get men. All you are doing is perpetuating rape culture with that nonsense.

When I tell you that I've been sexually abused/harassed/assaulted by at least four men during my lifetime which spans the course of 44 years (that's one per decade!), you should be hearing that, instead of trying to find ways to dismiss and diminish it. This is reality for most women. We're done now. We're not putting up with it anymore. Keep your hands to yourself.

I don't expect you will have read any of that, but you are the VERY PERSON WHO SHOULD BE READING IT AND TAKING IT IN. Learn something instead of wallowing in misogynistic ignorance.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
She hasn't proved she "loves sex", she has only shown that she is obsessed with it. I expect her only companionship comes in the form of sexually named pets.
Who cares? Couldn't be more irrelevant if you tried.

People who love sex can be raped. People who love sex can be sexually assaulted. People who love sex can be sexually harassed.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
If you hate the guy, he must have something going for him. He must have irked Miss Thunberg and Mr. Soros. Maybe you will own nothing and be happier for it? You may soon find out.
He spouts the same misogynistic garbage you're sharing here. You sound like one of his disciples.
He's currently up on charges for human trafficking. I'm sure some stupid woman is just lying or something.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
He spouts the same misogynistic garbage you're sharing here. You sound like one of his disciples.
He's currently up on charges for human trafficking. I'm sure some stupid woman is just lying or something.
It seems Tate became embroiled in controversy once he disparaged Ms. Thunberg, who is the prophet of the "Woke" green movement, subsidized by Soros, and whose god is the self-proclaimed creator of the Internet, a Mr. Al Gore. It was the U.S. Embassy, an arm of Biden, which made a call to the Romanians mouthing criminality by Mr. Tate. There has been no trial, nor is he still in custody. It was John Kerry, a green climate comrade of Al Gore, who was a past Secretary of State, and head of the embassies. Al Gore was a recent green Czar of the Biden administration, until it came out his family had their own private jet, which he initially lied about before Congress, which apparently was a carbon polluter, which would put Thunberg to shame. In the end, the lesson learned, was Tate should have recycled his pizza carton, and saved a lot of time and money. Apparently, you have a different narrative you are trying to push. In the U.S., a man is innocent until proven guilty. Apparently, listening to you, that isn't the criteria in Canada. Apparently, with Tate agreeing with his Islam religion, that a woman belongs to her husband, you think he should be put in jail. As Paul thinks that a woman is subject to her husband, once your husband is free of your bond, well your pool of available men will be limited to a very small area. In China, the rich have as many girlfriends as they can get away with. In India, the religious rule has been in the past to burn the wives with the husband at death. They seem to subjugate the wife to the husband.

Gore boasted: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
It seems Tate became embroiled in controversy once he disparaged Ms. Thunberg, who is the prophet of the "Woke" green movement, subsidized by Soros, and whose god is the self-proclaimed creator of the Internet, a Mr. Al Gore. It was the U.S. Embassy, an arm of Biden, which made a call to the Romanians mouthing criminality by Mr. Tate. There has been no trial, nor is he still in custody. It was John Kerry, a green climate comrade of Al Gore, who was a past Secretary of State, and head of the embassies. Al Gore was a recent green Czar of the Biden administration, until it came out his family had their own private jet, which he initially lied about before Congress, which apparently was a carbon polluter, which would put Thunberg to shame. In the end, the lesson learned, was Tate should have recycled his pizza carton, and saved a lot of time and money. Apparently, you have a different narrative you are trying to push. In the U.S., a man is innocent until proven guilty. Apparently, listening to you, that isn't the criteria in Canada. Apparently, with Tate agreeing with his Islam religion, that a woman belongs to her husband, you think he should be put in jail. As Paul thinks that a woman is subject to her husband, once your husband is free of your bond, well your pool of available men will be limited to a very small area. In China, the rich have as many girlfriends as they can get away with. In India, the religious rule has been in the past to burn the wives with the husband at death. They seem to subjugate the wife to the husband.

Gore boasted: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."
Oh boy, another deeply convoluted conspiracy theory!
We definitely need more of those. :facepalm:


All of this Gish Galloping nonsense just to make excuses for terrible behaviour.

I've got a better idea - stop supporting criminals.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Oh boy, another deeply convoluted conspiracy theory!
We definitely need more of those. :facepalm:


All of this Gish Galloping nonsense just to make excuses for terrible behaviour.

I've got a better idea - stop supporting criminals.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck. The complaint to Albania, was initiated by the U.S. embassy. Sounds up and up to me. Oh Yeah, one your black woman DEI judges from Georgia just got convicted of gross incompetence. Putting incompetent judges and prosecutors in the courts aren't helping anyone. And in general, as in the case of Tate, he is not considered a criminal until he is convicted. As for Trump's "conviction", that was with respect to a civil case, where the evidence required is less than that required for a criminal case, and will be reviewed by another court, and hopefully reversed, leaving you with egg on your face.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck. The complaint to Albania, was initiated by the U.S. embassy. Sounds up and up to me. Oh Yeah, one your black woman DEI judges from Georgia just got convicted of gross incompetence. Putting incompetent judges and prosecutors in the courts aren't helping anyone.
Great response when someone points out you're pushing baseless conspiracies. Just claim it walks and talks like a duck and voila, you're magically right now! LOL Oh and you threw in some racism for good measure. Nice work.
And in general, as in the case of Tate, he is not considered a criminal until he is convicted.
As for Trump's "conviction", that was with respect to a civil case, where the evidence required is less than that required for a criminal case, and will be reviewed by another court, and hopefully reversed, leaving you with egg on your face.
Just came here to highlight the absurdity of what you've said here. :)


Just to summarize your beliefs here ...

1. Innocent until proven guilty. Not a criminal until convicted.
2. Trump found liable for fraud, sexual abuse and defamation in a civil court by judge and jury. Still innocent. Didn't do anything wrong at all. Witch hunt! It's all going to be reversed someday.


Imagining that the egg is going to be on everyone else's face in these cases = comedy gold. Thanks for that. Icing on the cake of this absurdity.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
Great response when someone points out you're pushing baseless conspiracies. Just claim it walks and talks like a duck and voila, you're magically right now! LOL Oh and you threw in some racism for good measure. Nice work.
I didn't conjure up a conspiracy theory. I stated the historical facts, and hocus pocus, you came up with the conspiracy theory. As for your DEI narrative, it is Marxist in nature, and injustice, poverty, incompetency, and wailing women are the results. The latest failure in DEI is Mayorkas (Cuban), not that the Senate will do anything, or that he is incompetent in doing what he set out to do, but that he has failed to follow U.S. Law.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
1. Innocent until proven guilty. Not a criminal until convicted.
2. Trump found liable for fraud, sexual abuse and defamation in a civil court by judge and jury. Still innocent. Didn't do anything wrong at all. Witch hunt! It's all going to be reversed someday.
Apparently, in a Me Too setting, a man is guilty anytime a woman imputes a crime against them. That is going to make women a hot potato, that no one will go around. Your husband must be walking on eggshells. A hell of a life for him. As for a New York Court, that votes generally 2:1 Democratic, and lives under a Me Too umbrella, no real evidence is necessary to convict a man charged by a woman. As for convicting Trump of disparaging E. Carroll of being crazy, well, in most places you can't be convicted for telling the truth. As time marches on, and the media and the elite experts are more or less discredited, a lot of New Yorkers are realizing that Trump is their ally and not their enemy, and any political judicial war against him may not succeed, even in a historically democratic setting. The democrats will probably have to set up something of a black swan event to try and rig any election, because I am thinking their criminal proceedings are not going to wind up as they wish. E. Carrroll has her mice, cat, and dog, but what will you have when the Me Too crowd undermine their own platform? If she is sued by Trump, with regard to her video saying the rape was not sexual, will likely cost her around 80 million dollars, plus attorney fees. Not that there was any interaction to start with.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
He can't be rehabilitated. Some people are on forums just to write outrageous garbage.
The forums are here for you to refute what I have said via counter proofs, not by throwing stones at me. Directly attaching me is generally a proof that you have no arguments to the contrary to what I have presented.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I didn't conjure up a conspiracy theory. I stated the historical facts, and hocus pocus, you came up with the conspiracy theory.
No, that was you.
As for your DEI narrative, it is Marxist in nature, and injustice, poverty, incompetency, and wailing women are the results. The latest failure in DEI is Mayorkas (Cuban), not that the Senate will do anything, or that he is incompetent in doing what he set out to do, but that he has failed to follow U.S. Law.
And now you've Gish Galloped off into another tangent and you're just parroting far-right-wing talking points.

Why can't you ever stay on topic or address a single point?
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Apparently, in a Me Too setting, a man is guilty anytime a woman imputes a crime against them. That is going to make women a hot potato, that no one will go around. Your husband must be walking on eggshells. A hell of a life for him.
LOL You're psychologically projecting.

I'm sorry your life is so miserable that you have to blame women for it.

My husband and I have been quite happy for 24 years now. Thank you. He knows that I have been sexually assaulted and have had debilitating panic attacks for the last 2 decades because of it, and he encourages and supports me and helps me through it. He would never and has never sexually assaulted anyone, nor been accused of it. Despite your sexist beliefs, women don't make up sexual assaults all the time. In fact, we don't report them as much as we should, for myriad reasons given to you earlier, which I'm sure you didn't bother reading. Why learn anything when you can remain stagnant and wallow in your own ignorance, amirite? Good times.
As for a New York Court, that votes generally 2:1 Democratic, and lives under a Me Too umbrella, no real evidence is necessary to convict a man charged by a woman.
And yet evidence was presented and Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in a court of law. The man is guilty.
As for convicting Trump of disparaging E. Carroll of being crazy, well, in most places you can't be convicted for telling the truth.
Nope, it's called defamation. Trump has been found liable for doing it. Twice now in this one case.
As time marches on, and the media and the elite experts are more or less discredited, a lot of New Yorkers are realizing that Trump is their ally and not their enemy, and any political judicial war against him may not succeed, even in a historically democratic setting. The democrats will probably have to set up something of a black swan event to try and rig any election
Trump and his co-conspirators are the only ones who have tried to rig an election. The last one.

Your attempt to transfer his guilt to the Democrats is duly noted though.
, because I am thinking their criminal proceedings are not going to wind up as they wish. E. Carrroll has her mice, cat, and dog, but what will you have when the Me Too crowd undermine their own platform?
Trump is currently sleeping through his criminal proceeding in New York. Good start for him, eh? LOL
If she is sued by Trump, with regard to her video saying the rape was not sexual, will likely cost her around 80 million dollars, plus attorney fees.
LOL You think he can sue her for saying "rape was not sexual?" How?

So how come he hasn't sued her yet?
Not that there was any interaction to start with.
Oh, it's been determined in a court of law that there was, in fact, an interaction. It's been adjudicated. You don't get to say there wasn't.
Which was one of the points of my post that you ignored and doubled down on instead.



This post was in response to, "1. Innocent until proven guilty. Not a criminal until convicted.
2. Trump found liable for fraud, sexual abuse and defamation in a civil court by judge and jury. Still innocent. Didn't do anything wrong at all. Witch hunt! It's all going to be reversed someday."


No where in your response did you come anywhere close to speaking to the point. You've just engaged in more woman bashing and repetition of your previous claims.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
No where in your response did you come anywhere close to speaking to the point. You've just engaged in more woman bashing and repetition of your previous claims.
There are strong independent women, but they won't need DEI to get through life, and they don't consider themselves woman libs, and among the Progressive "woke", and they don't have a platform of complaints. Here is another DEI strong black woman who was declared the worst judge in Illinois. 'America's Worst Mayor': Illinois Democrat Accused of Covering Up Sexual Assault, Firing Victim Did you hear about the Toronto housing bubble might bust this year, indicated by the Toronto food bank use being up around 100%, and the 1.1 million average house price tags being a bit high, when full time workers can't afford their food costs. Apparently, Progressive programs bring about Marxist results. Progressive NY, Portland, Chicago, and San Francisco can try and call on the federal government to bail them out, but the Canadian federal government does not have anything in their coffers, and food bank use is way up across Canada. Just because your husband is in no position to complain about you, doesn't mean he is happy about his position. Men, even weak men, generally tend to keep their misfortunes to themselves, and they don't like change. Their only hope is the wife divorces them, without making false charges. It is better to live in an attic with a piece of bread, than to live in the house of a nagging woman (Proverbs 21:9.

9Better to live on a corner of the roof

than to share a house with a quarrelsome wife.
 

2ndpillar

Well-Known Member
No, that was you.

And now you've Gish Galloped off into another tangent and you're just parroting far-right-wing talking points.

Why can't you ever stay on topic or address a single point?
The point is that you come across as a Progressive DEI woman lib Marxist, who creates their own problems, and problems for others. Oh yeah, did I mention that the last DEI black woman Supreme court justice appointee apparently never read the 1st amendment, or at least has no idea of its context. Here is another election manipulation, whereas illegal migrants are urged to vote for Biden to keep the border open, which is only possible if voter ID is kept verboten. Not that you care, but when Canada fails, where are you going to flee if the U.S. fails?
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
The point is that you come across as a Progressive DEI woman lib Marxist, who creates their own problems, and problems for others.
Then you haven't made your point. I'm certainly not a Marxist. LOL

The point you have made is that you strongly dislike women, don't care to understand anything about them, and you will make utterly bizarre and borderline delusional claims about them at every turn. You appear to be more happy doing this than you are to actually engage in a back-and-forth discussion. You've even admitted you don't read my posts. Probably because I'm a woman.

I create my own problems? Well, I didn't sexually assault myself four different times, buddy. That was men. Men who don't seem to think women deserve any respect or dignity. Who believe that women who have strong opinions about their rights are "Marxists" and "Progressives" or "some black woman" and we "create their own problems" by being sexual abused and then having the nerve to go after the criminals who did it.

This is straight up sexism and misogyny.
Oh yeah, did I mention that the last DEI black woman Supreme court justice appointee apparently never read the 1st amendment, or at least has no idea of its context. Here is another election manipulation, whereas illegal migrants are urged to vote for Biden to keep the border open, which is only possible if voter ID is kept verboten.
Thanks for reinforcing my above points with this screed.

Why do you feel such a huge need to point out the colour of these womens' skin over and over?

Illegal immigrants can't vote, by the way.
Not that you care, but when Canada fails, where are you going to flee if the U.S. fails?

I'm more worried about the US failing at this point.
 
Top