Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Can it be anything else? It's persistent and deliberate, and I don't think it could be anything else.I don't see the point of it except to be rude and spiteful.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Can it be anything else? It's persistent and deliberate, and I don't think it could be anything else.I don't see the point of it except to be rude and spiteful.
I don't know. Let's ask.Can it be anything else? It's persistent and deliberate, and I don't think it could be anything else.
Meh. We already know he thinks referring birthsex amd claiming biology is a clever workaround.I don't know. Let's ask.
Hey, @Kfox, is what the point of you intentionally misgendering trans men and trans women?
Well, if he decides to start doing it to board members, he'll get in trouble. He's just making it harder for himself to have discussions with people here. That's why so don't see the point to doing it.Meh. We already know he thinks referring birthsex amd claiming biology is a clever workaround.
Well, if he decides to start doing it to board members, he'll get in trouble. He's just making it harder for himself to have discussions with people here. That's why so don't see the point to doing it.
I didn't.I don't know. Let's ask.
Hey, @Kfox, is what the point of you intentionally misgendering trans men and trans women?
You did. But go ahead and play games, I guess. I just asked a simple question.I didn't.
I explained it to you already, yet you ask the same question over and over.You did. But go ahead and play games, I guess. I just asked a simple question.
Where did you explain? I must not have seen the post.I explained it to you already, yet you ask the same question over and over.
Post #114Where did you explain? I must not have seen the post.
And I didn't deserve any of my warning points.I didn't.
Post #114
Agreed
Just so you know, sex hormones are a big part of everyone's biology and have a huge impact on and change just about every part of the body.
What are numbers of natal sex?A transsexual who is on hormones, especially after a number of years, is not really biologically the same as other numbers of their natal sex.
I disagree; though hormones are a part of biology, they are not the entirety of biology. Giving someone artificial hormones does not change that person from male to female. That’s why when women take steroids (male hormones) and lift weights, though she may get muscles as big as a man’s muscles, her muscles will not look like a man’s muscle; they will only look like bigger female muscles.Many of the changes are irreversible, as well. At the least, transsexuals are a kind of in-between, physically, between their natal sex and transitioned sex. So you're not really correct there, either.
I was kinda thinking the same thing about you. But nothing wrong with having a discussion; right?But I don't expect you to know what you're talking about here.
What about xx vs xy chromosomes? Or having a prostate instead of a uterus? What about ovaries vs testes? Or heart, and lung, size and capacity. What about bone density or even brain differences? I think there is a bit more to man vs woman than sex hormones.It's sex hormones that really make you a man or a woman,
It was a typo; I meant "members".Agreed
What are numbers of natal sex?
I said sex hormones are a big part of biology, not that they were all of it, obviously.I disagree; though hormones are a part of biology, they are not the entirety of biology. Giving someone artificial hormones does not change that person from male to female. That’s why when women take steroids (male hormones) and lift weights, though she may get muscles as big as a man’s muscles, her muscles will not look like a man’s muscle; they will only look like bigger female muscles.
Chromosomes are just a blueprint, and the finished product may not come out as expected. There's many things that affect sexual development. Like hormones.What about xx vs xy chromosomes? Or having a prostate instead of a uterus? What about ovaries vs testes? Or heart, and lung, size and capacity. What about bone density or even brain differences? I think there is a bit more to man vs woman than sex hormones.
How is a woman using steroids different than a trans man using testostorone?I already brought up athletes abusing androgens and said it's not the same as transsexual HRT. That female weightlifter in your example would not be taking the same levels of testosterone as a trans man. Testosterone therapy causes a trans man to develop a male musculature.
So if I understand you correctly, you are saying a biological male who is undergoing estrogen therapy for medical purposes (like prostate cancer etc) that due to the effects estrogen will have on the male body, he is no longer totally a biological male any more?I don't think you're understanding what I'm saying. Obviously hormones don't change everything after you've gone through puberty, such as bone structure (although they affect bone density). But it does have a big impact on your organs, muscles, ligaments, tendons, the blood, skin, hair, genitals, reproductive organs, brain, etc. I'm just saying that, for example, a trans man who is on testosterone cannot be said to be totally biologically female as if the testosterone hasn't changed the body in significant ways. Ditto for trans woman.
I applaud. Well said.That's a twist! Who is right?
Caitlyn Jenner Calls Transwoman Artemis Langford 'Perverted, Sexually Deviant Male' Who Doesn't 'Belong in Women's Spaces'
"Caitlyn Jenner accused a fellow transwoman of being nothing more than a "sexually deviant male" in a scathing tirade during an interview with America Reports host Sandra Smith earlier this week.
This shocking back-and-forth occurred after transgender college student Artemis Langford chose to join a sorority at the University of Wyoming, later resulting in several members of the group suing the organization because they allegedly felt uncomfortable with Langford's presence.
Jenner, who transitioned and legally changed her name herself back in 2015, slammed Langford for making the decision to join the women's college group, insisting that "if you look at those pictures, what I have to say is, he is a perverted, sexually deviant male."
Added the 73-year-old, "I’m sorry, Artemis Langford, you are not a woman and you do not belong in women’s spaces."
MSN
www.msn.com