That's what I suspected. . .I refuse.
Unless you're a completely useless moron, you can figure it out from my response above.
This is just more (3), (5) @ http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/2318652-post514.html
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's what I suspected. . .I refuse.
Unless you're a completely useless moron, you can figure it out from my response above.
Then all you have to do is show in the context what it does mean. . .
This is just more (2) @ http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/2318652-post514.html
That's what I suspected. . .
This is just more (3), (5) @ http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/2318652-post514.html
He came to die. . .your point is mute.
Which ones are you talking about?Well, that depends on which of your misinterpretations you're talking about.
Harmonious has already spoken the truth on that, until. . .you know the rest.For your process of death in "dying you shall die," one needs to look no farther than the simplest commentary or Hebrew grammar.
You don't even know what context is in terms of interpreting the meaning of a verse. . .Context would be the ancient Hebrew syntax. I happen to have this little rule memorized -- it's elementary. If it were a bit more difficult, I'd have to look it up.
You don't even know what context is in terms of interpreting the meaning of a verse. . .
The NT says to the contrary. . .and it is the authority for what is to be believed by the Christian.And what he did was sin.
1Corinthians 3:16-17
16Do you not know that you are a temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?
17If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him, for the temple of God is holy, and that is what you are.
Jesus destroyed the Temple of his body by his actions.
""My God, my God, why have thou forsaken me?" Because you destroyed your body.
BigRed
And what he did was sin.
1Corinthians 3:16-17
16Do you not know that you are a temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?
17If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him, for the temple of God is holy, and that is what you are.
Jesus destroyed the Temple of his body by his actions.
""My God, my God, why have thou forsaken me?" Because you destroyed your body.
BigRed
:foryou:Yes. As a Christian, I believe that Christ fulfilled the law.
:foryou:
WOW! . .I'm sure I don't have the ear that you do. . .but she is unbelievable!Hey smoky,
Check this out. It starts out kind of rough, but she's absolutely brilliant.
[youtube]rISjBGOtHhs[/youtube]
YouTube - Cecilia Bartoli Agitata da due venti Vivaldi
This is pretty weak. Essentially you're saying that because Jesus died, he sinned. Jesus was crucified by the Romans because they perceived that he was a threat. We don't know much more than that.
Harmonious already identified several other instances in the Gospels where Jesus may have sinned - not honoring his parents, for example.
WOW! . .I'm sure I don't have the ear that you do. . .but she is unbelievable!
Thanks!
I agree it's nebulous.
But if Jesus ARRANGED his own death at the hands of the Romans, in effect he was committing suicide by Romans. It may not be a sin but IMO it seems immoral.
I agree that Jesus sinned numerous times.
For example....
Chronologically, the first commandment by God was at Genesis 1:28.
""God blessed them; and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth""
This commandment is repeated several times in the Bible.....a sure sign that this is important to God. It is one of the 613 Mitzvot. [Commandments]
This commandment has been interpreted to obligate a man to marry and attempt to have children.
As far as we know, Jesus never married and never had any children. At least this is the traditional Christian view.
If Jesus never married nor had children he sinned by failing to attempt to be fruitful and multiply.
BigRed
You can ask HARMONIOUS, the resident Jewish scholar, her opinion.
I would be interested to read her opinion.
Dont you see a difference in creating evil at the beginning of time and then leaving it up to the free will of your creation to act how they want to?
In contrary to "orchestrating the holocaust/any genocide" in person?