Can sane me doubt Evolution-ism?

[questfortruth]

I don't think that you understood the video.

You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human.
It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a
serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.

 

[ChristineM]

You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human.
It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a
serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.

 

[The Hammer]

No, it is all the point of my thread. Please read it again, but with a serious mental effort to understand the point.

It's not logical, there is nothing to understand.

Maybe spell it out more clearly, if you think everyone is misinterpreting you.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

If only you could see that I see!
I see God, I see life, I see disproof of Adolf Hitler's most favorite book and author.

You see what you want to see.

 

[questfortruth]

You see what you want to see.

You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human.
It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a
serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.

It's not logical, there is nothing to understand.

Maybe spell it out more clearly, if you think everyone is misinterpreting you.

The first step to understand the point: fish is human, is this: I am extremely good in doing top science.
Please read my CV in the link in the thread. Thank you.

 

[ChristineM]

The first step to understand the point: fish is human, is this: I am extremely good in doing top science.
Please read my CV in the link in the thread. Thank you.

 

[questfortruth]

View attachment 50807

So, you have not made this important step. But if you do, then you will see, that I have a top-journal level result here. The NEW result in biology, the breakthrough:

fish is human.

 

[Clara Tea]

DISPROOF OF EVOLUTION-ISM CAN BE FUN

Disproof #1
If God would not make monkeys, which animal (or plant, insect, fish, microbe)
would Darwin choose for us as the next of kin
(the closest relative)? And to the farthest relative?

You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human. It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.

The first step to understand the point: fish is human, is this: I am extremely good in doing top science. Please read my CV in the link in the thread. Thank you.

Disproof #2

Each and every human gets born by a human only
and gives birth to a human only. That is humankind.
If you are not sure concerning yourself, be
positive, the President of the USA
(pick up the cutest one) is a human. And be sure
that at least one of the monkeys in the forest
(pick up the ugliest monkey) is not human. Thus,
there is no common ancestor between monkeys and
humans.

But on the next level of enlightenment, you should
compare humans not to the monkey (it is a brain work to find ten differences),
but to birds, or dogs, or insects, or trees, or amoebae, or viruses.
You get more convincing disproof of Evolution-ism because
in this theory all living beings are humans.

PROOF OF GOD AND UFO: Is Our World an Intelligent Simulation?, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2104.0152
PROOF OF MY SANITY: Science and Psycho

My hallucination said I'm sane (for a while there, it had to argue with my delusion).

"Presidents aren't monkeys" (well.....I'll take your word for that).

"Fish is human" (sounds fishy).

"Every human is born human and gives birth to human" Atavism (please see the link below).

Atavism - Wikipedia

 

[ChristineM]

So, you have not made this important step. But if you do, then you will see, that I have a top-journal level result here. The NEW result in biology, the breakthrough:

fish is human.

 

[QuestioningMind]

DISPROOF OF EVOLUTION-ISM CAN BE FUN

Disproof #1
If God would not make monkeys, which animal (or plant, insect, fish, microbe)
would Darwin choose for us as the next of kin
(the closest relative)? And to the farthest relative?

You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human. It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.

The first step to understand the point: fish is human, is this: I am extremely good in doing top science. Please read my CV in the link in the thread. Thank you.

So, you have not made this important step. But if you do, then you will see, that I have a top-journal level result here. The NEW result in biology, the breakthrough:

fish is human.

Disproof #2

Each and every human gets born by a human only
and gives birth to a human only. That is humankind.
If you are not sure concerning yourself, be
positive, the President of the USA
(pick up the cutest one) is a human. And be sure
that at least one of the monkeys in the forest
(pick up the ugliest monkey) is not human. Thus,
there is no common ancestor between monkeys and
humans.

But on the next level of enlightenment, you should
compare humans not to the monkey (it is a brain work to find ten differences),
but to birds, or dogs, or insects, or trees, or amoebae, or viruses.
You get more convincing disproof of Evolution-ism because
in this theory all living beings are humans.

PROOF OF GOD AND UFO: Is Our World an Intelligent Simulation?, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2104.0152
PROOF OF MY SANITY: Science and Psycho

It's rather sad that your belief system is so threatened by reality.

 

[ChristineM]

fish is human.

 

[questfortruth]

It's not logical, there is nothing to understand.

So, you have not made this important step. But if you do, then you will see, that I have a top-journal level result here. The NEW result in biology, the breakthrough:

fish is human.

I have heard conversations in mental hospitals, I tell you, they are much saner. Why? The people there get their medicine. If somebody would vote for me, I promise to build a mental Clinique in every district, any corner of the world.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human.
It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a
serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.

Why are you a fish?

 

[ChristineM]

A definition of human

a bipedal primate mammal


And a fish
Not bipedal
Not primate
Not mamnal

 

[Subduction Zone]

A definition of human

a bipedal primate mammal


And a fish
Not bipedal
Not primate
Not mamnal

Now try again using cladistics

 

[questfortruth]

Now try again using cladistics

It is Science fact: human is fish,

But it is illogical absurd: fish is human. Why? Because it is not peer-reviewed.

I have heard conversations in mental hospitals, I tell you, they are much saner. Why? The people there get their medicine. If somebody would vote for me, I promise to build a mental Clinique in every district, any corner of the world. If you disagree with "fish is human", then you agree with Creationism.

 

[ChristineM]

Now try again using cladistics

Humans, lungs
Fish, gills

Human, arms
Fish, fins

 

[Irate State]

These posts are crafted in a specific fashion, they're on purpose through and through. I refuse to accept that there's no intention behind the (to me) deliberately nonsensical argumentation.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Humans, lungs
Fish, gills

Human, arms
Fish, fins

Nope. You are trying to use homology. And then it would be:

Humans, lungs
Fish, swim bladder (which can sometimes be lungs even in fish)

But fins did become arms.

 

[questfortruth]

These posts are crafted in a specific fashion, they're on purpose through and through. I refuse to accept that there's no intention behind the (to me) deliberately nonsensical argumentation.

I love my audience, it is just an innocent conversation. Not needed to report me to authorities. Thank you.