• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can sane me doubt Evolution-ism?

The Hammer

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
questfortruth said:



The first step to understand the point: fish is human, is this: I am extremely good in doing top science.
Please read my CV in the link in the thread. Thank you.
Click to expand...

Lmao. Sorry no,

I'm not hiring you, I have no need for your CV.

You have an inner fish, an inner reptile, and an outer mammal, oh no.
 
Last edited:
Irate State

Irate State

Äkta människor
questfortruth said:
I love my audience, it is just an innocent conversation. Not needed to report me to authorities. Thank you.
Click to expand...

Of course I won't report you, you're not breaking the forums rules.
Many reply in all seriousness, many in a light-hearted manner, but it's undeniable that you're pulling everyone's leg.
So I say good job sir.
 
Last edited:
Dan From Smithville

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
questfortruth said:
DISPROOF OF EVOLUTION-ISM CAN BE FUN

Disproof #1
If God would not make monkeys, which animal (or plant, insect, fish, microbe)
would Darwin choose for us as the next of kin
(the closest relative)? And to the farthest relative?


You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human. It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.

The first step to understand the point: fish is human, is this: I am extremely good in doing top science. Please read my CV in the link in the thread. Thank you.

So, you have not made this important step. But if you do, then you will see, that I have a top-journal level result here. The NEW result in biology, the breakthrough:

fish is human.

It is Science fact: human is fish,

But it is illogical absurd: fish is human. Why? Because it is not peer-reviewed.

I have heard conversations in mental hospitals, I tell you, they are much saner. Why? The people there get their medicine. If somebody would vote for me, I promise to build a mental Clinique in every district, any corner of the world. If you disagree with "fish is human", then you agree with Creationism.

Disproof #2

Each and every human gets born by a human only
and gives birth to a human only. That is humankind.
If you are not sure concerning yourself, be
positive, the President of the USA
(pick up the cutest one) is a human. And be sure
that at least one of the monkeys in the forest
(pick up the ugliest monkey) is not human. Thus,
there is no common ancestor between monkeys and
humans.


But on the next level of enlightenment, you should
compare humans not to the monkey (it is a brain work to find ten differences),
but to birds, or dogs, or insects, or trees, or amoebae, or viruses.
You get more convincing disproof of Evolution-ism because
in this theory all living beings are humans.


PROOF OF GOD AND UFO: Is Our World an Intelligent Simulation?, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2104.0152
PROOF OF MY SANITY: Science and Psycho
Click to expand...
Have you ever heard of science?
 
Dan From Smithville

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
Viker said:
We're closely related to apes, not monkeys.

Our furthest relatives would be simple microscopic life forms.

Darwin didn't "choose" he concluded.
Click to expand...
As if Darwin was going through a list of candidates for consideration.

Darwin: Um, let's see. Koalas are really cute. I want to go with that one. No. Better make it monkeys. No. No! I know! I'll go with apes. Even better since we are already related to them.
 
Subduction Zone

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Viker said:
We're closely related to apes, not monkeys.

Our furthest relatives would be simple microscopic life forms.

Darwin didn't "choose" he concluded.
Click to expand...
We are apes. One cannot evolve out of one's history. What you just said is on the order of "Horses are closely related to equines".
 
Dan From Smithville

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
questfortruth said:
It is Science fact: human is fish,

But it is illogical absurd: fish is human. Why? Because it is not peer-reviewed.

I have heard conversations in mental hospitals, I tell you, they are much saner. Why? The people there get their medicine. If somebody would vote for me, I promise to build a mental Clinique in every district, any corner of the world. If you disagree with "fish is human", then you agree with Creationism.
Click to expand...
This isn't peer-reviewed either. So your thread is not a fish?

My hovercraft is full of eels.
 
Bear Wild

Bear Wild

Well-Known Member
questfortruth said:
If God would not make monkeys, which animal
would Darwin choose for us as the next of kin
(the closest relative)? And to the farthest relative?
Click to expand...

I am going for raccoons. They wash their food before the eat it. That would have set well with the his publication date in Victorian England 's image of proper etiquette. They also have von economo cells in their brains like humans although Darwin would not have known that.
 
Bear Wild

Bear Wild

Well-Known Member
questfortruth said:
DISPROOF OF EVOLUTION-ISM CAN BE FUN

Disproof #1
If God would not make monkeys, which animal (or plant, insect, fish, microbe)
would Darwin choose for us as the next of kin
(the closest relative)? And to the farthest relative?


You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human. It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.

The first step to understand the point: fish is human, is this: I am extremely good in doing top science. Please read my CV in the link in the thread. Thank you.

So, you have not made this important step. But if you do, then you will see, that I have a top-journal level result here. The NEW result in biology, the breakthrough:

fish is human.

It is Science fact: human is fish,

But it is illogical absurd: fish is human. Why? Because it is not peer-reviewed.

I have heard conversations in mental hospitals, I tell you, they are much saner. Why? The people there get their medicine. If somebody would vote for me, I promise to build a mental Clinique in every district, any corner of the world. If you disagree with "fish is human", then you agree with Creationism.

Disproof #2

Each and every human gets born by a human only
and gives birth to a human only. That is humankind.
If you are not sure concerning yourself, be
positive, the President of the USA
(pick up the cutest one) is a human. And be sure
that at least one of the monkeys in the forest
(pick up the ugliest monkey) is not human. Thus,
there is no common ancestor between monkeys and
humans.


But on the next level of enlightenment, you should
compare humans not to the monkey (it is a brain work to find ten differences),
but to birds, or dogs, or insects, or trees, or amoebae, or viruses.
You get more convincing disproof of Evolution-ism because
in this theory all living beings are humans.


PROOF OF GOD AND UFO: Is Our World an Intelligent Simulation?, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2104.0152
PROOF OF MY SANITY: Science and Psycho
Click to expand...

This thread sounds kind of fishy to me!!! Its whole basis starts out wrong since god did not make monkeys, they evolved and then just deteriorated from their.

Most of all I would not use this thread to assert your saneness. It can only go downhill from here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top