• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can sane me doubt Evolution-ism?

Evangelicalhumanist

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Wild Fox said:
This thread sounds kind of fishy to me!!! Its whole basis starts out wrong since god did not make monkeys, they evolved and then just deteriorated from their.

Most of all I would not use this thread to assert your saneness. It can only go downhill from here.
Click to expand...
Actually, it's fishier than you think. Look at the second word in the Thread subject, take a look at the claim made in post 27, and the location of the eavesdropping in post 32. There are many hints that make me just want to back away from dialogue with this individual.
 
Bear Wild

Bear Wild

Well-Known Member
Evangelicalhumanist said:
Actually, it's fishier than you think. Look at the second word in the Thread subject, take a look at the claim made in post 27, and the location of the eavesdropping in post 32. There are many hints that make me just want to back away from dialogue with this individual.
Click to expand...

Have you gone to their website? @questfortruth listed their publications. They speak for themselves. Oh my goddess! Strange
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Dan From Smithville said:
Have you ever heard of science?
Click to expand...

I am one of the top scientists, look up the links to my CV and Dark Matter and UFO demonstrations. Above in the thread.

Viker said:
We're closely related to apes, not monkeys.
Click to expand...

There is a common ancestor between humans and monkeys, isn't he? Then due to the humankind has shot the genetic material into the monkeys [namely the common ancestor Bob had four kinds: one pair were humans, other pair were monkeys], then monkeys must be considered as fully humans. They look very different but are natural humans. Why? Because Bob has given birth to humans, so Bob must be human. Then Human Bob can not give birth to monkeys, therefore these two monkeys, which were born are in fact, humans. Therefore, all monkeys are humans. And all other animals, plants, fish, amoeba, viruses are human too. Do you copy? If the bird (or mosquito, or snake) is a human, then he must be born by a human Elsa and John.
 
Last edited:
Dan From Smithville

Dan From Smithville

He who controls the spice controls the universe.
Staff member
Premium Member
questfortruth said:
I am one of the top scientists, look up the links to my CV and Dark Matter and UFO demonstrations. Above in the thread.



There is a common ancestor between humans and monkeys, isn't he? Then due to the humankind has shot the genetic material into the monkeys [namely the common ancestor Bob had four kinds: one pair were humans, other pair were monkeys], then monkeys must be considered as fully humans. They look very different but are natural humans. Why? Because Bob has given birth to humans, so Bob must be human. Then Human Bob can not give birth to monkeys, therefore these two monkeys, which were born are in fact, humans. Therefore, all monkeys are humans. And all other animals, plants, fish, amoeba, viruses are human too. Do you copy? If the bird (or mosquito, or snake) is a human, then he must be born by a human Elsa and John.
Click to expand...
Never heard of you.
 
firedragon

firedragon

Veteran Member
questfortruth said:
DISPROOF OF EVOLUTION-ISM CAN BE FUN

Disproof #1
If God would not make monkeys, which animal (or plant, insect, fish, microbe)
would Darwin choose for us as the next of kin
(the closest relative)? And to the farthest relative?


You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human. It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.

The first step to understand the point: fish is human, is this: I am extremely good in doing top science. Please read my CV in the link in the thread. Thank you.


So, you have not made this important step. But if you do, then you will see, that I have a top-journal level result here. The NEW result in biology, the breakthrough:

fish is human.

It is Science fact: human is fish,

But it is illogical absurd: fish is human. Why? Because it is not peer-reviewed.

I have heard conversations in mental hospitals, I tell you, they are much saner. Why? The people there get their medicine. If somebody would vote for me, I promise to build a mental Clinique in every district, any corner of the world. If you disagree with "fish is human", then you agree with Creationism.

There is a common ancestor between humans and monkeys, isn't he? Then due to the humankind has shot the genetic material into the monkeys [namely the common ancestor Bob had four kinds: one pair were humans, other pair were monkeys], then monkeys must be considered as fully humans. They look very different but are natural humans. Why? Because Bob has given birth to humans, so Bob must be human. Then Human Bob can not give birth to monkeys, therefore these two monkeys, which were born are in fact, humans. Therefore, all monkeys are humans. And all other animals, plants, fish, amoeba, viruses are human too. Do you copy?

If the bird (or mosquito, or snake) is a human, then he must be born by a human Elsa and John.

Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it? (John 6:60).

I have the lowest authority in the world and the greatest talent from God in the world. But because of low authority, I quote: "One day the evil spirit answered them, “Jesus I know, and Paul I know about, but who are you?”"
Acts 19:15

God replies:
“This is my Son, whom I love. Listen to him!”
Mark 9:7

Disproof #2

Each and every human gets born by a human only
and gives birth to a human only. That is humankind.


If you are not sure concerning yourself, be
positive, the President of the USA
(pick up the cutest one) is a human. And be sure
that at least one of the monkeys in the forest
(pick up the ugliest monkey) is not human. Thus,
there is no common ancestor between monkeys and
humans.


But on the next level of enlightenment, you should
compare humans not to the monkey (it is a brain work to find ten differences),
but to birds, or dogs, or insects, or trees, or amoebae, or viruses.
You get more convincing disproof of Evolution-ism because
in this theory all living beings are humans.


PROOF OF GOD AND UFO: Is Our World an Intelligent Simulation?, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2104.0152
PROOF OF MY SANITY: Science and Psycho
Click to expand...

Ha???
 
HonestJoe

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
questfortruth said:
You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human. It is all the point of my thread. Please read the thread with a serious mental effort to understand the point: the fish is a human.
Click to expand...
You are obviously not an idiot and so are perfectly capable of understanding what the video is actually saying. So the question is; Why are you lying about it?
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Rival said:
Right, but must you make thread after thread about it?
Click to expand...
Yes, every time it is about God and God with Science.
But in every post is the new idea and results. For example "fish is human" - is the idea of today.
Aren't somebody entertained?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top