Can science create a word or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation?

[LuisDantas]

Terminologies are not words strictly speaking, that is why these are called terminologies .
Regards

I suspect that there is some subtler meaning implied that did not translate.

Terminologies (in English, at least) are indeed collections of words. Creating a word is simply not at all difficult.

 

[LuisDantas]

The scientists make terminologies as science has no language of its own, as it is helpless, they don't make words strictly speaking. Please
Regards

You seem to be wanting to imply that science is a human cretor and therefore can't "truly" emulate the power of the Creator of Existence.

That is not likely to convince anyone who has not been raised to perceive the need of such a creator.

 

[LuisDantas]

My comments were for calling Quran by a poster as a book of fiction. Quran is the Revelation/Recitation for guidance of the humanity in ethical, moral and spiritual realms and it does that in a wonderful way. A book of fiction cannot do all these things. Please
Regards

For better or worse, that is largely or even entirely a matter of personal call.

Many people (most or all Muslims included, I assume) will agree with you on this respect.

Many or even most other people will not.

There is really no good argument to convince us unbelievers.

I realize that many Muslims hope or even expect that a reading of the whole of the Qur'an "with a pure intent" would be plenty enough. But that is wishful thinking and does not correspond to the reality of facts.

 

[A Vestigial Mote]

I just broke a ceramic cup (I annihilated it pretty good), and I made up a word to describe this action. It is "fictilibafflery." And I came up with this new word peripherally using science.

All of which makes about as much sense as the question in your original post.

 

[paarsurrey]

So what? No one claimed science produced it's own unique and complete language. Science is a tool not a thing.

This is my point, that science is just a tool in the hand of humans in the physical and material realms. It does not cover the whole human life.
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

As a rule, attempts to claim that God can do anything and human science can't are not likely to be well received.

Not because they are difficult to answer, but because they betray a poor understanding of science and religion and are difficult to answer without hurting the questioner's feelings.

Please quote the rule. Is it from religion or science?
Regards

 

[LuisDantas]

Please quote the rule. Is it from religion or science?
Regards

It is not a normative rule, just a way of saying that odds are good that it will happen that way.

 

[David M]

People can create any words they wish as words are part of language not something contained and developed only within science. Slang is an example of normal people creating words which have meaning. Scientists do make up words all the time for terminology.

People have created new languages, Esperanto and Klingon are both examples.

 

[David M]

The scientists make terminologies as science has no language of its own, as it is helpless, they don't make words strictly speaking. Please
Regards

Wrong. All terms are words but not all words are terms.

 

[paarsurrey]

Wrong. All terms are words but not all words are terms.

In a way,yes, but not exactly. Terms are not natural words they are artificial formations to convey one's idea to others.
Regards

_____________
Difference Between Word and Term:
"Some people will misuse the word ‘term’, since some of them think it is merely a fancier word for ‘word’. It is not, and it has a completely separate meaning.

To summarize, while all terms are words, not all words are terms. ‘Word’ is the basic, neutral word for things that represent concepts. Terms, however, are specialized words, and they tend to be more formal because of their common associations."
Difference Between Word and Term
Search terms: All terms are words but not all words are terms

 

[Nakosis]

Can science create a word* or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation**?
Please

Regards

I'm not convince anything can be destroyed, to nothing or created from nothing. Things are constantly changing form. So destruction and creation are the same thing. Something changing form. One form is destroyed another form is created.

 

[MonkeyFire]

It is or it isn't. The wish to be is a fact.

 

[Kilgore Trout]

Can science create a word* or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation**?
Please

Regards
__________
* + of a language
** +and not using anything in the Universe/s

One may like to read post #45 in another sub-forum.
and _______________do______#5_______ in this thread.

Can blue cloud very next grow pin provide we black red?

 

[paarsurrey]

I'm not convince anything can be destroyed, to nothing or created from nothing. Things are constantly changing form. So destruction and creation are the same thing. Something changing form. One form is destroyed another form is created.

Is it from science or religion? Please
Regards

 

[Nakosis]

Is it from science or religion? Please
Regards

Science

 

[paarsurrey]

Science

Please provide the quote and the link from a text-book of science or from a peer-reviewed article published in a science journal of repute and mentioning the relative discipline of science which deals with it.
Regards

 

[Nakosis]

Please provide the quote and the link from a text-book of science or from a peer-reviewed article published in a science journal of repute and mentioning the relative discipline of science which deals with it.
Regards

Nah... This is something you can check out for yourself.

 

[QuestioningMind]

Sorry.
Book of fictions don't provide rational reasoning, while Quran provide them. So Quran is not a book of fiction. Please
Regards

Is there any reason why you're ignoring my post stating that the fictional book 1984 provides a very rational and reasoned argument against communism?

 

[Repox]

God has created the universe/s and everything in it. God has created the inanimates/animates and the human beings*. God has taught the human beings the language/s while the others, the inanimates and animates except human beings have not been bestowed with any language/s. So, the question in this context is very much religious, one would agree. Isn't it? Please
Regards

_____________
*Through the process of evolution in millions of years, of course as the science says, though there is nothing in writing with the science in this connection, as the matter is related to pre-pre-pre-pre-History.

Perhaps, the issue is neither science or humans can create a single atom or physical substance from nothing. Everything came from the beginning of the universe, and without the existence of our material world there would be nothing, or something like that.

 

[Nigel]

Can science create a word* or an atom of the Universe/s from annihilation**?
Please

Regards
__________
* + of a language
** +and not using anything in the Universe/s

One may like to read post #45 in another sub-forum.
and _______________do______#5_______ in this thread.

Yes "the standard model" an atom referring to the description of an atom discovered through annihilation of said atom.