Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
A guy dressed up like a woman.That does not answer my question, and now I have another;
Do you know what a drag queen is?
I am expecting two answers that are actually answers.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
A guy dressed up like a woman.That does not answer my question, and now I have another;
Do you know what a drag queen is?
I am expecting two answers that are actually answers.
Yes.Really? Just because they put on "women's clothing"?
Working with children is a privilege, not a right. Those that think using drag queens for storytelling have the onus of why they should be doing so, not the other way around. The drag queens could simply do the story telling in non-drag. Insisting on doing it in drag shows they have a separate agenda. Don't be disingenuous. Admit it.And to you;
Do you know what a drag queen is? I don't think you do because sex isn't explicitly or inherently a part of it.
Working with children is a privilege, not a right. Those that think using drag queens for storytelling have the onus of why they should be doing so, not the other way around. The drag queens could simply do the story telling in non-drag. Insisting on doing it in drag shows they have a separate agenda. Don't be disingenuous. Admit it.
There's a guy at my local steak house that cuts up the food right in front of the patrons. He's an entertainer too. Pole dancers claim to be entertainers too.Drag queens are more than men in drag. They are entertainers. That is enough validation for them to be involved with some aspects of education.
And who decides who can gets this privilege? Is this decided by a bunch of bigoted thugs?Working with children is a privilege, not a right. Those that think using drag queens for storytelling have the onus of why they should be doing so, not the other way around. The drag queens could simply do the story telling in non-drag. Insisting on doing it in drag shows they have a separate agenda. Don't be disingenuous. Admit it.
Perhaps we equate drag queens to being sexual and it's not the case. I don't know, but maybe there is a connotation where it shouldn't be.There's a guy at my local steak house that cuts up the food right in front of the patrons. He's an entertainer too. Pole dancers claim to be entertainers too.
Teachers and those that work with children are held to high standards and must pass rigorous screening. It is a public trust. Drag queens can entertain elsewhere. Little children don't need their kind of "entertainment".
There is not a spontaneous ground swell of parents and children asking for drag entertainers to read them kiddie stories. This is a movement being imposed by outside interest groups. Stop trying to normalize it. It is deleterious.
What's there to be disingenuous about? Drag is an act. A performance. And I don't see it as significantly less than a big deal. So the kids are getting exposure to another ways of the many varieties we come in.Working with children is a privilege, not a right. Those that think using drag queens for storytelling have the onus of why they should be doing so, not the other way around. The drag queens could simply do the story telling in non-drag. Insisting on doing it in drag shows they have a separate agenda. Don't be disingenuous. Admit it.
What about it? Am I supposed to care? Is there something wrong with this? Is there something wrong with being a woman and a man shouldn't want to dress up as one?A guy dressed up like a woman.
Oooh! I love arguments that can be refuted by only two words:Yes.
We have precedent that the only groups that are bringing guns are the right leaning fascists that claim to want to protect America, but essentially just encourage a militaristic violent ideology that will reward fear instead of reasonThe article doesn't say which side brought the guns. BTW, what's so wrong about a gun?
It's apparently just shameful for me to dress up as women, but likely also for women to dress up as men, even if that is often overlooked (women wear pants, and they don't care because they acknowledge pants are not innately men's clothing)What about it? Am I supposed to care? Is there something wrong with this? Is there something wrong with being a woman and a shouldn't want to dress up as one?
So if their intent was to kill someone because they are viewed as a threat based on regressive nonsense that thinks drag queens are grooming and sexualizing children, it'd be bad, right? Or do you think it's fine to just use a gun to kill anyone you view as a threat even if they're doing nothing that warrants it? Drag queens are, in this context, doing little more than song and dance alongside reading to kids.No, a gun is a mechanism designed to fire a projectile. Any killing comes from the intent of the gun user. A gun never kills anyone. People do. Gun fear is irrational.
Do you...just not care to look into why this has been a thing since...at least 2014, by my recollection? It's not everyone else's job to do research you apparently don't have the interest in or the capacity to find something contrary to your preconceptions.Working with children is a privilege, not a right. Those that think using drag queens for storytelling have the onus of why they should be doing so, not the other way around. The drag queens could simply do the story telling in non-drag. Insisting on doing it in drag shows they have a separate agenda. Don't be disingenuous. Admit it.
I doubt they'd have this kind of concern for things we can also have generic paranoid associations of grooming and child abuse to, but are used in performances that entertain kids and have for decades: mascot costumes at Disney parks, clowns, people that use puppets to entertain kids.What's there to be disingenuous about? Drag is an act. A performance. And I don't see it as significantly less than a big deal. So the kids are getting exposure to another ways of the many varieties we come in.
I have, probably literally, a thousand other things of greater concern.
Kind of like how people think a mere 5 pointed star must be Satanic...or a reverse cross, which is most definitely not SatanicPerhaps we equate drag queens to being sexual and it's not the case. I don't know, but maybe there is a connotation where it shouldn't be.
Pants on women are evil!! Or so Sister Cindy told me. About 45 years ago. At college. Every spring Jeb and the Destroyers would come to our university. Pity, I never saw them destroy anything. And I can still find them on YouTube.It's apparently just shameful for me to dress up as women, but likely also for women to dress up as men, even if that is often overlooked (women wear pants, and they don't care because they acknowledge pants are not innately men's clothing)
I mean, there are groups that still think that who are probably still not quite mainstream, like Mennonites or Pentecostals.Pants on women are evil!! Or so Sister Cindy told me. About 45 years ago. At college. Every spring Jeb and the Destroyers would come to our university. Pity, I never saw them destroy anything. And I can still find them on YouTube.
Watching this video I realized that I may have seen her the first year that she and Jed took their evangelist show on the road. She was a hot young thing at that time. What happened?I mean, there are groups that still think that who are probably still not quite mainstream, like Mennonites or Pentecostals.
United Pentecostals seem to have this in their dress code, "No slacks "because they immodestly reveal the feminine contours of upper leg, thigh, and hip"
Really? It seems that some take it as an established fact that drag is dangerous. And I don't know why. And I wonder if even they know why. I wonder if they have ever actually examined their position.
So explain it to me. I say if I guy wants to put on a dress and read a book to children that is a good thing. More people should do this. And I don't care if they dress up like a clown, or a puppy or in drag.