• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can the dead be contacted according to your tradition?

Can the dead be contacted according to your tradition?

  • Yes

    Votes: 18 50.0%
  • No

    Votes: 18 50.0%

  • Total voters
    36

Spiderman

Veteran Member
Can you tell me what religion Jesus was? Can you then tell me what scriptures he quoted from when he said "it is written"?
Jesus did not come to destroy the law....he said he came to fulfill it.

The condition of the dead was never part of the Law. It was a belief that all Jews held, that the dead were in Sheol. Sheol in Hebrew is the equivalent of the Greek "hades".....so what is "hades"? I can tell you now, it is not "gehenna" and it is not Christendom's "hell". Sheol is nothing more than the common grave....we all go there. Jesus went there. The dead are not conscious, but "sleeping" in their graves, awaiting Jesus' call to "come out". (John 5:28-29)

1 Thessalonians 4:13-17:
"But we do not want you to be uninformed, brothers and sisters, about those who have died, so that you may not grieve as others do who have no hope. 14 For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so, through Jesus, God will bring with him those who have died. 15 For this we declare to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will by no means precede those who have died 16 For the Lord himself, with a cry of command, with the archangel’s call and with the sound of God’s trumpet, will descend from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up in the clouds together with them to meet the Lord in the air; and so we will be with the Lord forever." (NRSVCE)

This Catholic version renders this passage in a way that is not very accurate. You will notice that in the first verse it says..."we do not want you to be uninformed, brothers and sisters, about those who have died"

They have rendered the word "koimaō" here as "died" when it literally means to "sleep".

Genesis Chapter 1 (NASB)

Whereas the word "apothnēskō" means to die and is used in the next verse....."we believe that Jesus died and rose again".

Genesis Chapter 1 (NASB)
The dead "sleep" as Jesus said of of his friend Lazarus.....

John 11:11-14:
"After saying this, he told them, “Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep, but I am going there to awaken him.” 12 The disciples said to him, “Lord, if he has fallen asleep, he will be all right.” 13 Jesus, however, had been speaking about his death, but they thought that he was referring merely to sleep. 14 Then Jesus told them plainly, “Lazarus is dead." (NRSVCE)

In this verse they have correctly translated "koimaō" as "fallen asleep" so it confirms that they mean the same thing. Death is merely a sleep, not the continuation of life in another form in another realm. Where did Jesus call Lazarus from?
No one went to heaven before Jesus. If Lazarus had gone to a better place, why would Jesus bring him back to this life, only for him to die again?



Please supply chapter and verse so that we can confirm this. There are no "souls" in heaven. Do you know what the Bible's definition of a "soul" is? It is not what Christendom teaches. The soul (Hebrew neʹphesh, Greek psy·kheʹ) is a living breathing creature, it never means an immaterial or disembodied spirit.

The only personage we are permitted to speak to in heaven is the Father. We are to direct all our prayers to "Our Father who is in heaven" and we are to ask his favor or to grant our petitions, "in Jesus' name". Jesus said that he was "the way, the truth and the life" and that no one could "come to the Father except through him". Nowhere are we told to pray to Jesus or to Mary or the saints.....only to the Father.



The transfiguration, Jesus said was a vision, (Matthew 17:9) it was not an actual physical manifestation of Moses and Elijah.
Just before the transfiguration, Jesus said....
Truly I say to you that there are some of those standing here who will not taste death at all until first they see the Son of man coming in his Kingdom" (Matthew 16:28) Shortly thereafter, he fulfilled that promise by permitting Peter, James and John to see him in his kingdom glory. Moses represented the Law, and Elijah represented the Prophets, both of which pointed to Jesus as King of God's kingdom.
in Revelation 5:8, where John depicts the saints in heaven offering our prayers to God under the form of "golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints." But if the saints in heaven are offering our prayers to God, then they must be aware of our prayers and they must be alive.

What God forbid in the OT was conjuring the dead for purposes of gaining information.


Also, in the transfiguration, Jesus was interacting with Moses and Elijah. If you believe differently, that is an extra-biblical belief someone made up.

The Souls in Heaven are alive:
Luke 16
22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;
note below.]
25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
.26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.
.27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:
28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.

Anyhow, Lazarus and Abraham were alive and the rich man could communicate with them even from Hell.

The Bible is not clear on a lot of beliefs however. One belief it appears you follow is that every Doctrine you believe must be found in Scripture. That Doctrine destroys itself because nowhere in Scripture does it state that the Bible is the final and only authority in settling matters of faith and morals.

The belief that every belief about Theology must be found in Scripture is a man-made invention found nowhere in Scripture. If the Bible was to be the final authority, surely Jesus would have left the early Christians with such a book.

The first Christians were not Bible Christians. They were mostly illiterate. They obeyed the Church authority. The Apostles did not have a Bible, neither did they go around making copies of Scripture and distributing them.
 

Mercurio

Member
In Hinduism we try to get the soul to move on to it's next physical birth. So we do the opposite of trying to contact them. It's 'Move along now," In the rare instance, though, its more personal, and that soul wants in to a 'survivors' family. In that particular instance, its more 'Welcome back!"
As I understand it, the funeral rites are designed to encourage the soul to let go of its attachments to the physical body and the things of the life it just had.
 

Mercurio

Member
Some Hindu Traditions do, yes. But not all
In general, I think the various levels or planes are accepted.
I don't know about the Soul, as that is a different concept then Atman and Jiva.
The way I use the word soul, I mean what you call Jiva. I do not mean Atman.

But the Jiva/Atman will always reincarnate as even the ideas of Hindu hell and heaven
You confuse me. I think the Jiva incarnates and travels to heavens and hells -- I do not think the Atman does.

(if you read the site) are of hellish and Heavenly Planets which are not eternal, the Jiva return to earth.
Nothing is eternal except Brahma. No? The problems of the soul in the hells and heavens is not that those places are unstable and disappear for him; rather the soul achieves its purposes for visiting them and then moves on.

And there is no mention of contacting the dead.

I dont know :shrug:



Could be, but the site itself does not mention anything about "Souls", communicating or that we are able to communicate with the dead.

Dhanyavad
Not using those words; but when it mentions ghosts, it seems to be saying to me that a soul is operating on more one level at the same time. It also implies that unpleasant things can happen if funeral rites are not performed correctly.
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
As I understand it, the funeral rites are designed to encourage the soul to let go of its attachments to the physical body and the things of the life it just had.
Yes. Funerals do vary by sect and culture within Hinduism as well. I've only been to 3 or 4. One interesting thing is that all the directions in the rituals are done in reverse. For example, if an aarti flame is waved over the deceased its done counterclockwise, the opposite of regular pujas. The soul is said to leave through the center of the skull as well. It's pretty interesting, ritualistically, because you don't get to see it that often. There is a separate priesthood from temple priests too. (At least in Saiva Sri Lankan culture, the one I'm familiar with) Temple priest would never go near a funeral other than for other temple priests. Then there is the 31 day grieving period before being able to go back to the temple, and such. Lots of details.
 

Mercurio

Member
It may be of interest some prominent rabbis taught that Paradise and hell (gehinnom) are next to each other, separated by a few inches. From this story Jesus told, it seems he agreed with that view. You can see from one to the other.

PARADISE - JewishEncyclopedia.com

There are a nether Gehinnom and an upper one, over against the nether and the upper Gan 'Eden. Curiously enough, hell and paradise join each other. R. Johanan claims that a partition of only a hand-breadth, or four inches wide, separates them. The Rabbis say the width is but two fingers (= inches; Midr. Ḳohelet; Yalḳ., 976).

What we ought not to believe is that this situation is eternal. How dreadful if it were; but Abraham is not dead. We also read this:

Matthew 22:32 I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.

It is also hard to explain how King Jehoram got a letter from Elijah if Elijah "died" during the reign of Jehoshaphat.

2 Chronicles 21:12 And there came a writing to him from Elijah the prophet, saying, Thus saith the Lord God of David thy father, Because thou hast not walked in the ways of Jehoshaphat thy father, nor in the ways of Asa king of Judah,

In the quote from the Jewish Encyclopedia, the expression "Gan 'Eden" mean,s of course, the Garden of Eden or Paradise. Jesus promised the thief to meet him there that very day. They did go to Paradise or Gan Eden. They did not go to Heaven, the Heaven of the Father. We know that since later Jesus said:

John 20:17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.
 
Last edited:

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
in Revelation 5:8, where John depicts the saints in heaven offering our prayers to God under the form of "golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints." But if the saints in heaven are offering our prayers to God, then they must be aware of our prayers and they must be alive.

The "Saints" did not go to heaven until Jesus returned to take them 'home' to 'the place he had prepared for them'.
All the dead slept in an unconscious state until it was time for Christ to be installed as king. (1 Thessalonians 4:13-17)

Daniel saw this future event almost 2,500 years before it took place. (Daniel 7:13-14)

What God forbid in the OT was conjuring the dead for purposes of gaining information.

How did God communicate with his earthly servants? If it wasn't in dreams and visions, it was sending his angels in human form to instruct them directly. e.g. the angels who physically escorted Lot and his family out of Sodom were in materialized form. They ate and drank meals prepared for them by both Abraham and Lot. Never did God's people communicate with spirits. They were to communicate directly with God through the only means that he prescribed....a mediator, Jesus Christ.

Also, in the transfiguration, Jesus was interacting with Moses and Elijah. If you believe differently, that is an extra-biblical belief someone made up.

No, it is entirely within keeping with Jewish beliefs. The transfiguration was given to Jews. Jews believed in resurrection, not immortality of the soul. The apostles naturally assumed that Moses and Elijah had been resurrected and Peter was going to erect tents for them to spend the night. Do spirits need tents to sleep in?

The Souls in Heaven are alive:
Luke 16
22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;
note below.]
25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
.26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.
.27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:
28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.

This parable has nothing to do with literal heaven and hell. Again, Jesus gave it to Jews, who had no notion of a place of eternal torment in a fiery hell. That "hell" is an invention of Christendom.
The players in this parable represent groups of people. The rich man represented the Pharisees and the beggar represented the poor sinners that the rich man despised. Each of them "died" to their former condition because Jesus came to save the "lost sheep of the house of Israel", not its wicked leaders. That means that the position of God's favor (Abraham's bosom) now shifted from those hypocritical Pharisees to the spiritually impoverished ones who accepted the good news and were refreshed by Jesus' teachings. The torment of the Pharisees was in their response to Jesus' constant criticism of them as the self-righteous hypocrites they were.

Taking this parable literally is a little silly....it means that in spite of a great chasm between them, heaven and hell are within speaking distance to one another and a drop of water on someone's finger would quench anyone's thirst in a fire.

The Bible is not clear on a lot of beliefs however. One belief it appears you follow is that every Doctrine you believe must be found in Scripture. That Doctrine destroys itself because nowhere in Scripture does it state that the Bible is the final and only authority in settling matters of faith and morals.

Jesus said...."Sanctify them in the truth; Your word is truth."
When tempted by the devil, three times Jesus refuted what he said by the same expression...."It is written" pertaining to the scriptures. He used scripture to back up what he said.
Paul wrote...."All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work."

"Now when they had traveled through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a synagogue of the Jews. 2 And according to Paul’s custom, he went to them, and for three Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures, 3 explaining and giving evidence that the Christ had to suffer and rise again from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus whom I am proclaiming to you is the Christ.” (NASB)


If the word of God doesn't teach it, then Christ didn't either.
In original Christianity, there was no Pope, no liturgy, no holy water, no priests (clergy), no Nuns, no fancy garb or funny hats,

images
images
images


Jesus and his apostles dressed like everybody else. That is why Judas had to identify his Master with a kiss.

There was no crucifix or sign of the cross, no adoration of Mary, no ornate buildings, no idolatry, no infant baptism.....in fact nothing that you see that masquerades as Christianity today.
I don't believe that any of these are Christian in origin......
images
images
images


The belief that every belief about Theology must be found in Scripture is a man-made invention found nowhere in Scripture. If the Bible was to be the final authority, surely Jesus would have left the early Christians with such a book.

That is a convenient doctrine of Catholicism so that it could introduce false doctrines and claim that they were inspired of God. There is a reason for the canon we have at present. In it is all we need to know about God's purpose for this earth and everything on it. The "Church" has traveled well outside of those teachings, so that there is not even a similarity with what Jesus started.

The first Christians were not Bible Christians. They were mostly illiterate. They obeyed the Church authority. The Apostles did not have a Bible, neither did they go around making copies of Scripture and distributing them.

From the above quotations from the scriptures it is clear that they based their whole ministry around God's word.
It was the Pharisees' interpretation of it that was at fault.....just as I believe it is the Church's interpretation of it that is in error now.
 

Mercurio

Member
How did God communicate with his earthly servants? If it wasn't in dreams and visions, it was sending his angels in human form to instruct them directly. e.g. the angels who physically escorted Lot and his family out of Sodom were in materialized form. They ate and drank meals prepared for them by both Abraham and Lot. Never did God's people communicate with spirits. They were to communicate directly with God through the only means that he prescribed....a mediator, Jesus Christ.
Numbers 12:6 And he said, Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the Lord will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream.
 

Mercurio

Member
The "Saints" did not go to heaven until Jesus returned to take them 'home' to 'the place he had prepared for them'.
All the dead slept in an unconscious state until it was time for Christ to be installed as king. (1 Thessalonians 4:13-17)
You are forgetting to take this passage into account:

1 Corinthians 15:51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,

Paul was writing to people alive then in the church of Corinth. If they all died and slept, he lied to them.

How did God communicate with his earthly servants? If it wasn't in dreams and visions, it was sending his angels in human form to instruct them directly. e.g. the angels who physically escorted Lot and his family out of Sodom were in materialized form. They ate and drank meals prepared for them by both Abraham and Lot. Never did God's people communicate with spirits. They were to communicate directly with God through the only means that he prescribed....a mediator, Jesus Christ.

Are you citing texts that prop up what you have been taught while ignoring those which contradict your views? Angels are spirits.

Psalm 104:4 Who maketh his angels spirits; his ministers a flaming fire:

This is quoted later in Hebrews:

Hebrews 1:7 And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire.

This parable has nothing to do with literal heaven and hell. Again, Jesus gave it to Jews, who had no notion of a place of eternal torment in a fiery hell. That "hell" is an invention of Christendom.
Must it be a parable because you say so? You're right Jews don't put much stock in "eternal torment in a fiery hell." They do however believe that the souls of good people go join other righteous souls in Paradise, Gan Eden, or the Bosom of Abraham; and they further believe that some souls benefit from the corrective fires of Gehinnom -- or hell. By no means is either state necessarily eternal.
The players in this parable represent groups of people. The rich man represented the Pharisees and the beggar represented the poor sinners that the rich man despised. Each of them "died" to their former condition because Jesus came to save the "lost sheep of the house of Israel", not its wicked leaders. That means that the position of God's favor (Abraham's bosom) now shifted from those hypocritical Pharisees to the spiritually impoverished ones who accepted the good news and were refreshed by Jesus' teachings. The torment of the Pharisees was in their response to Jesus' constant criticism of them as the self-righteous hypocrites they were.

Taking this parable literally is a little silly....it means that in spite of a great chasm between them, heaven and hell are within speaking distance to one another and a drop of water on someone's finger would quench anyone's thirst in a fire.
Your take on it seems even sillier to me. I don't recall the hypocritical Pharisees asking for a drop of spiritual refreshment from Jesus. Who were their brothers they were concerned about? How does Lazarus fit into this interpretation? Were the Pharisees hoping Jesus would send them another messenger to refresh them?

And what does this mean then? Does Lazarus represent the "dead" followers of Jesus? Your take on this seemds very confused.

Luke 16:30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.
31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.


You can take it up with the Jews who do believe Paradise and Gehinnom are that close to each other. The gulf? Perhaps impassable space would convey the concept better. The typical Jew then would have recognized exactly what he meant; and I daresay many Jews today would too. And the manner of how justice is meted out is also a typical Jewish idea.

Every soul has committed both good deeds and bad ones. God's Justice requires every good deed be rewarded and every bad one also taken care of. If you were mostly evil in this life, odds are you had some good things happen to you and if those are enough of a reward, the soul doesn't need any rewards after death. So it will go to Gehinnom for purification of the bad urges and to correct for the bad deeds. On the other hand, a person who has mostly good deeds but has led a mostly miserable life has no need for correction in Gehinnom. He can go to Paradise and receive rewards.

If the word of God doesn't teach it, then Christ didn't either.
You do not seem ready to be here discussing the Scriptures. "You err, not knowing them."

The New Testament does not contain every word Jesus said any more than it contains every deed he did.

John 21:25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.

We also know Jesus and others quoted from the Book of Enoch; but that book is not in our Bible. Another book is referred to as well -- the Assumption of Moses which mentions the controversy between Michael and Satan over the body of Moses.

In original Christianity, there was no Pope, no liturgy, no holy water, no priests (clergy), no Nuns, no fancy garb or funny hats,

There was no crucifix or sign of the cross, no adoration of Mary, no ornate buildings, no idolatry, no infant baptism.....in fact nothing that you see that masquerades as Christianity today.
I don't believe that any of these are Christian in origin......
We are going way topic now, I think; but I can add most assuredly there were no followers of Luther, Zwingli, or Charles Taze Russell.

That is a convenient doctrine of Catholicism so that it could introduce false doctrines and claim that they were inspired of God. There is a reason for the canon we have at present. In it is all we need to know about God's purpose for this earth and everything on it. The "Church" has traveled well outside of those teachings, so that there is not even a similarity with what Jesus started.
We have the canon because the Catholic and Orthodox Churches approved them for reading in the churches.

From the above quotations from the scriptures it is clear that they based their whole ministry around God's word.
It was the Pharisees' interpretation of it that was at fault.....just as I believe it is the Church's interpretation of it that is in error now.
Odds are maybe we're wrong if we read one Scripture and derive an opinion only to read any Scripture which contradicts our opinion. You have said all Scriptures are good for correction -- and I have quoted some trying to correct your opinions. We will now see if you really believe the Scriptures are profitable for correction or if you will continue to hang onto the doctrines of the tradition you have been taught. You wrote rashly concerning angels as if they are not spirits when the Bible says they are. I think it also safe to believe you have never seen or spoken to an angel. This is rather like reading a book about how to repair cars when you never saw a car. You have ideas, but are they the right ones? If you found a mechanic who saw and worked on cars, you might be able to tell how accurate your ideas were. In spiritual matters, the same principal holds -- and we should take care not to follow spiritually blind and deaf teachers. If at all possible, one should try to find a spiritually sighted person -- and hope he knows what he's talking about. But still allow the mind open -- for any man may err -- you won't know for sure until you see things for yourself.

Basing your beliefs solely on the Bible can be dangerous. Look at the confusion that has resulted from spiritually blind men trying. We need someone (hopefully someone with spiritual eyes and spiritual ears) to steer us in the right direction. What good did the Scriptures do the Jews whom Jesus reproved?

John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

And had the Scriptures taught the people at Berea everything they needed to know?

Acts 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

They heard words said by Paul and Silas. They wanted to believe them but didn't do it right away. They went through the Scriptures (the Old Testament, mind you) to see what Paul and Silas said could be true. It wasn't taught in the Old Testament or they would have already known it; but they went through it to see if the Scriptures knocked down the new teachings they had just heard.

Consider too the fix the eunuch was in when he tried to understand Isaiah.

Acts 8:30 And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest?
31 And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
All forms of divination are to be rejected: recourse to Satan or demons, conjuring up the dead or other practices falsely supposed to "unveil" the future.
What if you have a gift from God to do those very things, though? I can see the future (the catch is that it has to pertain to someone I'm closed to and I suspect I'm just unconsciously "simulating" possible scenarios) and in dreams I can speak to dead people.

Shall we condemn Jesus for summoning Elijah and Moses and knowing the future?


And efforts to contact the dead with seances, ouija boards, or through whatever method, can result in bringing a demon into your life.
Some denominations watch way too many movies.

Praying for the dead, though, is a very good thing to do. And praying to saints in heaven to ask for their intercessions is perfectly alright.
lol

The "spirits" contacted are not the dearly departed but demonic spirits who impersonate the dead.
So Jesus was lying about who the two dead guys beside him were?

There is no ambiguity in this passage.
I love it when the bible has no ambiguity: it usually means rife and rank hypocrisy is going to appear soon.

The spirits are real but they are not as 'friendly' as they pretend to be. Ask anyone who has tried to break free from them.
So beat them up. Faith in Jesus will get rid of them like Raid, yes?

The Bible says that the dead know not anything. They are unconscious.
And yet there are plenty of ghost stories, so someone is misinformed.

If I had tarot cards and said "oh wi do wi deem be la. Give me the power I beg of you"
*dies laughing* If I weren't so terrified of dolls (it's a phobia of mine), I'd have bought both him and Tiffany at Spencer's. :)

Catholic exorcists often have to deal with these things.
Anyone with half a spine can tell a demon to get lost.

I would say it is impossible because of Atman & re-birth concepts, which postulate a re-cycling or a cyclic rebirth of the Atman, the Atman is not a person or spirit, nor is it tied down to one life.
Is it immediate, reincarnation? Is there a waiting period? (honest question)

Once you invite them, don't ever try to leave them and search for the true God. They will make you pay.
This little light of mine, I'm going to let it shine ... and turn into a floodlight that vaporizes the demon's butt back to hell ... :p

I am a Christian and a theologian. When I began collage I was hoping to earn a major in near east archeology and cultural anthropology than the clergy contemporary theology'.
You'll never impress Deeje. She has admitted she doesn't like academia and considers all but her religious clergy to be liars and corrupt.

If there were any conditions placed on Adam and Eve other than a return to the dust from which they were created, do you not think God would have told them at first?
This is the same God who wouldn't admit that the REAL reason they shouldn't eat the fruit is because God didn't want them to have superpowers like He did.

There was no crucifix or sign of the cross, no adoration of Mary, no ornate buildings, no idolatry, no infant baptism.....in fact nothing that you see that masquerades as Christianity today.
I don't believe that any of these are Christian in origin......
JWs didn't exist in that time period either, you know.
 

lostwanderingsoul

Well-Known Member
Ghost stories are different. There is a spirit world ( angels and demons ) who can make appearances to the living. This is not the same as dead people. Dead people are not spirits. Many people are influenced by these demons to do evil things. And angels may help certain people in need. But praying to a dead person is not the same. Your dead relatives are dead. They cannot hear your prayers or do anything to help you.
 

Forever_Catholic

Active Member
That is a convenient doctrine of Catholicism so that it could introduce false doctrines and claim that they were inspired of God. There is a reason for the canon we have at present. In it is all we need to know about God's purpose for this earth and everything on it. The "Church" has traveled well outside of those teachings, so that there is not even a similarity with what Jesus started.
And it is convenient for Protestants to explain Catholicism as though they have some expertise on it when they know absolutely nothing beyond the ignorant propaganda that other heretics have fed them.
 

Forever_Catholic

Active Member
There is a spirit world ( angels and demons ) who can make appearances to the living. This is not the same as dead people.
Right.

Dead people are not spirits.
They are spirits. The human soul is everlasting, and does not lose consciousness or enter into a state of nothingness after physical death.

But praying to a dead person is not the same. Your dead relatives are dead. They cannot hear your prayers or do anything to help you.
Jesus, has both divine nature and human nature. Although he is God the Son, he was born as the Messiah like a human. He also died like a human and then demonstrated that the soul continues to live after death. Saints in heaven, both angels and human souls to whom our prayers for intercession are addressed, are enabled by God to hear them.

Our dead relatives won't hear our prayers if they are in hell or purgatory, and we don't know that they are in heaven, so we don't pray to them.

We should pray for them. We should pray for the forgiveness of their sins, in case they have not yet been judged. We should pray for Christ's mercy on them in case they are in purgatory, so that they may be purified more quickly and taken to heaven.

For if he were not expecting the fallen to rise again, it would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead. But if he did this with a view to the splendid reward that awaits those who have gone to rest in godliness, it was a holy and pious thought. Thus he made atonement for the dead that they might be absolved from their sin. (2 Maccabees 12:44-46)

(2 Maccabees is one of the books that Martin Luther rejected and removed from his version of the.bible, which became the model for Protestant bibles. But they remain in Catholic bibles. They were part of the Septuagint, which became the Old Testament. And the Septuagint is the bible that Christ and the apostles knew and quoted from, as we see frequently in the New Testament.)
 
Last edited:

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
You are forgetting to take this passage into account:

1 Corinthians 15:51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,

Paul was writing to people alive then in the church of Corinth. If they all died and slept, he lied to them.

I see you have a preference for the KJV? Do you speak that kind of English today? I don't, and it just confuses the socks off me. Can we use a modern English version so that the scriptures speak the same language we do? I will quote from the NASB or one of your choice.

The verse you feel I am failing to take into account, is part of an entire passage. Can we see how Paul's words relate in context to the subject of 1 Corinthians 15?.....

The main objective of this chapter is Christ’s resurrection as a guarantee for all other resurrections.....and the fact that spirit-anointed Christians must die and forfeit their earthly bodies in order to be raised to immortality and incorruption in a heavenly realm.

In verses 20-23 Paul states....

"But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are asleep. For since by a man came death, by a man also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive. But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, after that those who are Christ’s at His coming"

So do you see what I see? There is an "order" to the resurrection of the dead. Jesus Christ was the very "first" human to be raised to spirit life in heaven. Now notice when the resurrection for Christ's disciples takes place.....NOT until his "coming".

You do not believe that he has come quite yet, do you? :shrug:

Deeje said:
How did God communicate with his earthly servants? If it wasn't in dreams and visions, it was sending his angels in human form to instruct them directly. e.g. the angels who physically escorted Lot and his family out of Sodom were in materialized form. They ate and drank meals prepared for them by both Abraham and Lot. Never did God's people communicate with spirits. They were to communicate directly with God through the only means that he prescribed....a mediator, Jesus Christ.

Are you citing texts that prop up what you have been taught while ignoring those which contradict your views? Angels are spirits.

Psalm 104:4 Who maketh his angels spirits; his ministers a flaming fire:

This is quoted later in Hebrews:

Hebrews 1:7 And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire.

Who is arguing that angels are not spirits?
297.gif

If you read what I wrote, you can see that the angels never appeared as "spirits" but in a materialized form. They did not communicate with humans unless it was in a dream, or a vision, or in human form.....they did not have wings in most instances, so that the humans they visited did not really know that they were angels at first. Its not as if they needed physical wings, but to convey flight to those who had never experienced it in anything but a winged creature, it was necessary back then.

Must it be a parable because you say so? You're right Jews don't put much stock in "eternal torment in a fiery hell."
Chapters 13-16 were all parables.....so it isn't just my say-so.
The ancient Jews had NO belief in life after death, let alone inventing places for the dead to go.....that was Christendom's idea, borrowed from pagan religions.....Plato mostly. The apostate Jews adopted that Hellenic belief as well, but it is not in their scriptures.

They do however believe that the souls of good people go join other righteous souls in Paradise, Gan Eden, or the Bosom of Abraham; and they further believe that some souls benefit from the corrective fires of Gehinnom -- or hell. By no means is either state necessarily eternal.

To a first century Jew, "Gehenna" was the city's garbage dump where the corpses of executed criminals were cast because they were not considered worthy of a decent burial. Have you not noticed in Jewish cemeteries the elaborate tombs that house their dead?
For a Jew not to have a burial tomb meant that the person would not be remembered in the resurrection. It was never a place of correction. The grave (sheol) is where everyone went, regardless of their station in life. (Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10)
Jesus said he would raise the dead from their tombs, both "the righteous and the unrighteous". (John 5:28-29) In order to be called from their graves, the people would still have to be in them...."sleeping".

Your take on it seems even sillier to me. I don't recall the hypocritical Pharisees asking for a drop of spiritual refreshment from Jesus. Who were their brothers they were concerned about? How does Lazarus fit into this interpretation? Were the Pharisees hoping Jesus would send them another messenger to refresh them?

The rich man requests “father Abraham” to send Lazarus “to the house of my father, for I have five brothers.” The rich man thus confesses he has a closer relationship to another "father", whom Jesus identified as Satan the Devil. (John 8:44)
The rich man requests that Lazarus water down God’s judgment messages so as not to put his “five brothers,” his religious allies, in “this place of torment.”

“But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to these.’” So, if the “five brothers” would escape torment, all they have to do is heed the writings of Moses and the Prophets that identify Jesus as the Messiah and then become his disciples.
But the rich man objects: “‘No, indeed, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them they will repent.’ But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.’”

God will not provide special signs or miracles to convince such people. They must read and apply the Scriptures if they would obtain his favor. (Luke 16:16, 22-31; )

You can take it up with the Jews who do believe Paradise and Gehinnom are that close to each other. The gulf? Perhaps impassable space would convey the concept better. The typical Jew then would have recognized exactly what he meant; and I daresay many Jews today would too. And the manner of how justice is meted out is also a typical Jewish idea.

Please do not confuse later Jewish ideas with the writings of the ancient Hebrews to whom the scriptures were written There is a reason why Christ said his Father had abandoned that apostate system. (Matthew 23:37-39) If they had God's word, why did they reject Jesus and expect someone who fulfilled the Messianic criteria more than he did?

Every soul has committed both good deeds and bad ones. God's Justice requires every good deed be rewarded and every bad one also taken care of. If you were mostly evil in this life, odds are you had some good things happen to you and if those are enough of a reward, the soul doesn't need any rewards after death. So it will go to Gehinnom for purification of the bad urges and to correct for the bad deeds. On the other hand, a person who has mostly good deeds but has led a mostly miserable life has no need for correction in Gehinnom. He can go to Paradise and receive rewards.

You do not seem ready to be here discussing the Scriptures. "You err, not knowing them."

Please show us where in the Hebrew scriptures I would find any of what you just said.....? Chapter and verse would be appreciated. :)
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
We also know Jesus and others quoted from the Book of Enoch; but that book is not in our Bible. Another book is referred to as well -- the Assumption of Moses which mentions the controversy between Michael and Satan over the body of Moses.

The “Book of Enoch.” is an uninspired, apocryphal book written many centuries later than the rest of the Hebrew scriptures, probably sometime during the second and first centuries B.C.E. The last book of the Hebrew canon was written by Malachi in 443 B.C.E.

Jude’s letter contains some information not found elsewhere in the Bible. It alone mentions the archangel Michael’s dispute with the Devil over Moses’ body and the prophecy uttered centuries earlier by Enoch. (Jude 9, 14, 15) I do not see anywhere in scripture that Moses body was assumed.

Deuteronomy 34:5-8:
"So Moses the servant of the Lord died there in the land of Moab, according to the word of the Lord. 6 And He buried him in the valley in the land of Moab, opposite Beth-peor; but no man knows his burial place to this day. 7 Although Moses was one hundred and twenty years old when he died, his eye was not dim, nor his vigor abated. 8 So the sons of Israel wept for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days; then the days of weeping and mourning for Moses came to an end.."

Whether Jude received this information through direct revelation or by reliable transmission (either oral or written) is not known. If the latter was the case, this may explain the presence of a similar reference to Enoch’s prophesying in the apocryphal book of Enoch. A common source could have furnished the basis for the statement in the inspired letter as well as in the apocryphal book.

We are going way topic now, I think; but I can add most assuredly there were no followers of Luther, Zwingli, or Charles Taze Russell.

Each played their part in fulfilling God's purpose.

We have the canon because the Catholic and Orthodox Churches approved them for reading in the churches.

No, I'm sorry but this is God's word, not mans'. There is not a single word in it written by any Catholic or Orthodox person.
The whole of the Bible was written by Jews. It is God who saw to it that his word would be made available to all......can we thank the Catholic Church for that?
Do you count the people burned at the stake for even possessing a copy of the Bible? :rolleyes:

You have said all Scriptures are good for correction -- and I have quoted some trying to correct your opinions. We will now see if you really believe the Scriptures are profitable for correction or if you will continue to hang onto the doctrines of the tradition you have been taught. You wrote rashly concerning angels as if they are not spirits when the Bible says they are. I think it also safe to believe you have never seen or spoken to an angel. This is rather like reading a book about how to repair cars when you never saw a car. You have ideas, but are they the right ones? If you found a mechanic who saw and worked on cars, you might be able to tell how accurate your ideas were. In spiritual matters, the same principal holds -- and we should take care not to follow spiritually blind and deaf teachers. If at all possible, one should try to find a spiritually sighted person -- and hope he knows what he's talking about. But still allow the mind open -- for any man may err -- you won't know for sure until you see things for yourself.

It appears to me as if you rashly make assumptions about what people believe without actually reading what they write...I never said angels were not spirits. I said that they never appeared as 'spirits' to humans, for the same reason that Jesus didn't. Jews were forbidden to communicate with spirits. God would never have placed that kind of a stumbling block in front of his people. Dreams and visions were not real but the materialized angels were....so was the resurrected Jesus. They could see them, speak with them, touch them and feed them.
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
Basing your beliefs solely on the Bible can be dangerous. Look at the confusion that has resulted from spiritually blind men trying. We need someone (hopefully someone with spiritual eyes and spiritual ears) to steer us in the right direction. What good did the Scriptures do the Jews whom Jesus reproved?

John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

Are you serious? Jesus and his apostles centered their whole ministry on the Hebrew scriptures, especially as they pertained to the Messiah. The Jewish leaders denied that Jesus fulfilled the scriptural criteria because he didn't side with them or their give credence to their oral traditions.
We do need men to steer us in the right direction, (Hebrews 13:17) but if we choose the wrong ones, we will end up like the Jews who rejected Jesus.....still misled and misleading others, many centuries later.

And had the Scriptures taught the people at Berea everything they needed to know?

Acts 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.

They heard words said by Paul and Silas. They wanted to believe them but didn't do it right away. They went through the Scriptures (the Old Testament, mind you) to see what Paul and Silas said could be true. It wasn't taught in the Old Testament or they would have already known it; but they went through it to see if the Scriptures knocked down the new teachings they had just heard.

The Beroeans too had to ascertain whether Jesus was the Christ from their own scriptures....they were commended for doing so.

Consider too the fix the eunuch was in when he tried to understand Isaiah.

Acts 8:30 And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest?
31 And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.

That archaic English gives me the willies. :confused:

Here it is in plain English.....

"Philip ran up and heard him reading Isaiah the prophet, and said, “Do you understand what you are reading? And he said, “Well, how could I, unless someone guides me?” And he invited Philip to come up and sit with him.” (NASB)

So we do need someone to guide us....I have found my reliable guides who are, as we speak, out there preaching the good news in every nation, as Jesus instructed. (Matthew 10:11-14; Matthew 24:14; 28:19-20).

No one from any church where I have ever lived has come to my door and offered to help me understand the Bible....only JW's. How do you explain that? If Jesus told us to "search" for the "worthy ones" and offer them the good news, how are the churches actually doing that? (Acts 5:42; 20:20)
 

Mercurio

Member
I see you have a preference for the KJV? Do you speak that kind of English today? I don't, and it just confuses the socks off me. Can we use a modern English version so that the scriptures speak the same language we do? I will quote from the NASB or one of your choice.
You are free to use whatever version you please; and please don't try to dictate to me which version I should use. I was brought up using the KJV, and when I want to quote a passage and try to use other versions, often I can't find the passages since they use other words.

The verse you feel I am failing to take into account, is part of an entire passage. Can we see how Paul's words relate in context to the subject of 1 Corinthians 15?.....

The main objective of this chapter is Christ’s resurrection as a guarantee for all other resurrections.....and the fact that spirit-anointed Christians must die and forfeit their earthly bodies in order to be raised to immortality and incorruption in a heavenly realm.

In verses 20-23 Paul states....

"But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are asleep. For since by a man came death, by a man also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive. But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, after that those who are Christ’s at His coming"

So do you see what I see? There is an "order" to the resurrection of the dead. Jesus Christ was the very "first" human to be raised to spirit life in heaven. Now notice when the resurrection for Christ's disciples takes place.....NOT until his "coming".
The context doesn't change that line. The NASB is as unambiguous as the KJV:

Behold, I tell you a mystery; we will not all sleep, but we will all be changed,

Did everyone in the church at Corinth die or sleep? Or were some changed without falling asleep? That is the question which you dodged here.

You do not believe that he has come quite yet, do you? :shrug:
Here is what I believe:

Hebrews 9:28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.

Has he appeared to you yet for the first time?

Who is arguing that angels are not spirits?
297.gif
You said it. From the prior post.

Never did God's people communicate with spirits. They were to communicate directly with God through the only means that he prescribed....a mediator, Jesus Christ.
Angels are spirits. If God sends an angel to someone, he sent a spirit. It's not hard to grasp that. Balaam did not see the angel at first although his animal did.

Angels as spirits can make themselves visible to everyone if they want. They may also be visible to one person who has spiritual sight but invisible to others. (2 Kings 6:17)

If you read what I wrote, you can see that the angels never appeared as "spirits" but in a materialized form. They did not communicate with humans unless it was in a dream, or a vision, or in human form.....they did not have wings in most instances, so that the humans they visited did not really know that they were angels at first. Its not as if they needed physical wings, but to convey flight to those who had never experienced it in anything but a winged creature, it was necessary back then.
This too is not right. The "lying spirit" sent to deceive Ahab did not take on physical form. It inspired the prophets to deceive Ahab.
 

Mercurio

Member
Chapters 13-16 were all parables.....so it isn't just my say-so.
The ancient Jews had NO belief in life after death, let alone inventing places for the dead to go.....that was Christendom's idea, borrowed from pagan religions.....Plato mostly. The apostate Jews adopted that Hellenic belief as well, but it is not in their scriptures.
Your lack of knowledge of Jewish beliefs is showing.

To a first century Jew, "Gehenna" was the city's garbage dump where the corpses of executed criminals were cast because they were not considered worthy of a decent burial. Have you not noticed in Jewish cemeteries the elaborate tombs that house their dead?
I suggest you go to a Jewish source if you want to know what they believe about Gehinnom. This looks like some kind of Protestant propaganda to me. We know what different Rabbis believed then since they were writing down then the various teachings of past Rabbis. Those oral writings came to be known as the Talmud or Oral Torah. Paul commends it:

Romans 3:1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?
2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.


Oracles there mean something oral. Jesus quoted them, Paul did. It may sound strange to you that they would quote the Talmud when it hadn't all been written down yet; but they did. And when the Jews got around to committing them all to writing, we see the passages that got quoted. You do not have those oracles. You are content solely with the "Written" Scriptures.

For a Jew not to have a burial tomb meant that the person would not be remembered in the resurrection. It was never a place of correction. The grave (sheol) is where everyone went, regardless of their station in life. (Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10)
Jesus said he would raise the dead from their tombs, both "the righteous and the unrighteous". (John 5:28-29) In order to be called from their graves, the people would still have to be in them...."sleeping".
Many did sleep before Jesus' time. Some still fall asleep after death. I've seen some myself. The Buddhists in Tibet also know about how souls can fall asleep -- and they correctly say there are types of sleep. One lasts a short time, the other can last a very long time. Can such souls be awakened? Surely.
The rich man requests “father Abraham” to send Lazarus “to the house of my father, for I have five brothers.” The rich man thus confesses he has a closer relationship to another "father", whom Jesus identified as Satan the Devil. (John 8:44)
The rich man requests that Lazarus water down God’s judgment messages so as not to put his “five brothers,” his religious allies, in “this place of torment.”

“But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to these.’” So, if the “five brothers” would escape torment, all they have to do is heed the writings of Moses and the Prophets that identify Jesus as the Messiah and then become his disciples.
But the rich man objects: “‘No, indeed, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them they will repent.’ But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.’”

God will not provide special signs or miracles to convince such people. They must read and apply the Scriptures if they would obtain his favor. (Luke 16:16, 22-31; )
This is incomprehensible stuff you've written here. Truly incomprehensible. Jesus found his disciples -- picked them. The Father had given them to him, and he found them all. Yet here you are saying others failed somehow because they didn't become disciples of Jesus.

I tell you the rich man had Abraham as a father; and that is why Abraham was there, talking to him.

Please do not confuse later Jewish ideas with the writings of the ancient Hebrews to whom the scriptures were written There is a reason why Christ said his Father had abandoned that apostate system. (Matthew 23:37-39) If they had God's word, why did they reject Jesus and expect someone who fulfilled the Messianic criteria more than he did?
In general, most of Israel was meant to reject Jesus. It may seem hard to understand; but don't rebel at it.


John 12:7 But though he had done so many miracles before them, yet they believed not on him:
38 That the saying of Esaias the prophet might be fulfilled, which he spake, Lord, who hath believed our report? and to whom hath the arm of the Lord been revealed?
39 Therefore they could not believe, because that Esaias said again,
40 He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.
41 These things said Esaias, when he saw his glory, and spake of him.


That passage also contradicts your idea that "God will not provide special signs or miracles to convince such people." It doesn't matter for some people if they see signs or miracles. Besides Moses had cautioned the Jews not to believe someone just because he could perform signs and wonders.

Paul also explains why the Jews did not believe in Jesus:

Romans 11:7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.
8 (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day.
9 And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them:
10 Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway.
11 I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.


This is tied to the salvation of the Gentiles. But not to worry. All Israel will be saved.

26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father's sakes.
29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief:
31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.
32 For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.


Please show us where in the Hebrew scriptures I would find any of what you just said.....? Chapter and verse would be appreciated. :)
I have already done so when I pointed out where what you wrote contradicted the Hebrew Scriptures. The example of how angels are spirits comes to mind. They may appear to men as looking like men in material form; but they are still spirits. If anything, I thought perhaps I was quoting too much Scripture.

I was not saying the Jewish beliefs about Gehinnom and Paradise were laid out explicitly in the Hebrew Scriptures. If you read the New Testament, however, you find more explicit references to those Jewish beliefs. We can take your supposition that Gehinnom means a burning rubbish heap and check that to see if you are right or if the Jews are.

Mat 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Luk 12:5 But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.

Men could not destroy anyone's soul by throwing them into a burning rubbish heap. That means Gehinnom (spelled differently in Greek) can't mean rubbish heap as you say. Yes, originally the areas was thought cursed because of children sacrificed to Molech in the valley of Hinnom; and yes, people did burn rubbish there. But the spiritual place is what is meant in Matthew 10 and Luke 12.

It may also interest you that Jews believe when the Scriptures say someone died and was gathered unto his people, it means they went to Paradise and were united happily with other members of their family.
 

Mercurio

Member
The “Book of Enoch.” is an uninspired, apocryphal book written many centuries later than the rest of the Hebrew scriptures, probably sometime during the second and first centuries B.C.E. The last book of the Hebrew canon was written by Malachi in 443 B.C.E.
You say it's uninspired; but we see in the Gospels that Jesus quoted it.

Jude’s letter contains some information not found elsewhere in the Bible. It alone mentions the archangel Michael’s dispute with the Devil over Moses’ body and the prophecy uttered centuries earlier by Enoch. (Jude 9, 14, 15) I do not see anywhere in scripture that Moses body was assumed.
You don't see where it came from because you never read the book it came from.

Deuteronomy 34:5-8:
"So Moses the servant of the Lord died there in the land of Moab, according to the word of the Lord. 6 And He buried him in the valley in the land of Moab, opposite Beth-peor; but no man knows his burial place to this day. 7 Although Moses was one hundred and twenty years old when he died, his eye was not dim, nor his vigor abated. 8 So the sons of Israel wept for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days; then the days of weeping and mourning for Moses came to an end.."

Whether Jude received this information through direct revelation or by reliable transmission (either oral or written) is not known. If the latter was the case, this may explain the presence of a similar reference to Enoch’s prophesying in the apocryphal book of Enoch. A common source could have furnished the basis for the statement in the inspired letter as well as in the apocryphal book.
It is known.

No, I'm sorry but this is God's word, not mans'. There is not a single word in it written by any Catholic or Orthodox person.
Please don't put words in my mouth. I said we have the canon because the Orthodox and Catholic Churches approved them for reading. This evolved over time. One Bishop might approve a book while another hadn't. Each Bishop decided this for himself. How this evolved was different in the Orthodox Church from how it evolved in the West. The Bishops were not writing books but only deciding which books were worth reading and which ones were not.

The whole of the Bible was written by Jews. It is God who saw to it that his word would be made available to all......can we thank the Catholic Church for that?
God did not copy manuscripts Himself; and He did not by Himself decide which books would be read in a Bishop's churches. If you believe God was at work, then you would have to believe He used the Bishops of the Orthodox and Catholic Churches to preserve the books and to come to the right consensus over which should be read in churches.

Do you count the people burned at the stake for even possessing a copy of the Bible? :rolleyes:
Can you name one Bishop who condemned anyone to death for owning a Bible? You cannot. Kings banned it, not the Church.

It appears to me as if you rashly make assumptions about what people believe without actually reading what they write...I never said angels were not spirits.
You did, and anyone can see you did. You can deny it all you like, but you said that. If you erred, just say so. If you want to say you wrote sloppily, just say so. But I know what you said.

I said that they never appeared as 'spirits' to humans, for the same reason that Jesus didn't.
And in one of the posts above, I've shown that they did show up as invisible spirits at times.

Jews were forbidden to communicate with spirits. God would never have placed that kind of a stumbling block in front of his people.
This may be your belief, but it doesn't line up with the Bible.

We see an angel being invisible in the story about Balaam; and we see a "lying spirit" sent forth to deceive prophets when God wished to bring disaster to Ahab.

Dreams and visions were not real but the materialized angels were....so was the resurrected Jesus. They could see them, speak with them, touch them and feed them.
Now you say dreams and visions are not real? They may not be physical but does that mean they aren't real? Does something have to be physical in order to be real? Is the Holy Spirit also unreal because it doesn't take on a physical form?

Dreams and visions are real. The soul which is carnally attached to the material body and the world is apt to think they aren't real, that only the material world is real. That idea is apt to make the soul go to sleep when the physical body dies. If his body doesn't exist, then perhaps he also can't exist.

Galatians 6:8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.

John 3:6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.

John 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

Your belief that all will sleep is apt to make it true for you when your physical body dies; but I tell you that all of the people at Corinth did not sleep, just as Paul promised them. Some were changed before the death of the physical body; and these did not fall asleep. They knew of their own spiritual existence.

John 11:26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

The Dark Side loves it when people believe, "When you're dead, you're dead." Such people lacking the right belief often do fall asleep and may remain asleep a long, long time. The Jews who believed this were very apt to do it too -- and many did fall asleep. I tell you if we have the right belief and faith, there is no need to die and fall asleep.
 
Last edited:
Top