Katzpur
Not your average Mormon
What do you long for instead, Dopp? Anything?doppelgänger;1519354 said:No it's not. I don't long for salvation. Therefore, it's not universal. QED.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do you long for instead, Dopp? Anything?doppelgänger;1519354 said:No it's not. I don't long for salvation. Therefore, it's not universal. QED.
i personally think that the punishment of hell creates a need to be saved. i think most people want to feel secure.
No it's not. I don't long for salvation. Therefore, it's not universal. QED.
I don't really long for anything. There are things I like and things I don't, and I pursue/avoid them accordingly to the extent I can. I certainly don't long for anything resembling "salvation." I've never gotten a straight answer to what it is I even need to be "saved" from, actually, despite asking people of almost every faith over the span of some 25 years or so.What do you long for instead, Dopp? Anything?
Well, from my perspective, we've all sinned to one degree or another and there are consequences for sinning. To be saved is to not have to pay those consequences because someone else paid for you. That's not straight enough?doppelgänger;1519569 said:I've never gotten a straight answer to what it is I even need to be "saved" from, actually, despite asking people of almost every faith over the span of some 25 years or so.
No. What is "sin"? Who decides? What are the consequences you are alluding to?Well, from my perspective, we've all sinned to one degree or another and there are consequences for sinning. To be saved is to not have to pay those consequences because someone else paid for you. That's not straight enough?
I didn't question your belief. I was merely questioning why you don't think anyone has ever given you a straight answer. I believe my answer was to the point and well-worded. If I explained what sin was, who decides and what the consequences are, what difference would it make? I apparently am not able to convey my thoughts well enough that you would consider me to have given you a straight answer. Nothing I could say further would make an ounce of difference. Clearly, I was answering from the perspective of someone who believes in a Higher Power. If you don't, then I guess it's a moot point.doppelgänger;1519734 said:No. What is "sin"? Who decides? What are the consequences you are alluding to?
If I don't believe in dieties, why would I need "saving" from sin?
But it wasn't at all. My question was "What do I need need to be 'saved' from?". It was not what do you think you need to be saved from.I didn't question your belief. I was merely questioning why you don't think anyone has ever given you a straight answer. I believe my answer was to the point and well-worded.
Well, you wouldn't, and you don't. Since you don't believe there is a God, it is understandable that you don't believe in salvation. I obviously wasn't thinking clearly.doppelgänger;1519749 said:Why would I long for salvation if I don't even know what I need to be saved from?
I believe sin to be the voluntary transgression of one of God's commandments. Therefore, it is God who decides what sin is. The consequences range from separation from God in the next life to failing to be worthy of the blessings He has promised to the faithful. For someone like me, who believes in Jesus Christ, faith in Him, repentence, baptism for the remission of sins, receiving the Gift of the Holy Ghost and remaining faithful to Him throughout one's life make forgiveness and a reconciliation with God possible.doppelgänger;1519758 said:Aside from that, your answer did not address what "sin" is, who decides, what the "consequences" are or how professing belief in the right words ideas or rituals changes the consequences of one's actions.
Should the race He is portrayed as matter?
And perhaps you are not known for your critical thinking skills. Have you ever thought that the portrayal of Jesus as white is a theological statement- (and not that it means Christianity is a "European religion".)Well, I guess Christianity really isn't known for it's regard for accuracy or authenticity, is it?
i dont know if the title of this post really gets across my question. what i mean is, can a person, who has never read the bible, and never met a christian and had a conversation about it, come to know jesus and be saved? like a native in the amazon jungle, who has never had any opportunity to meet a christian, or read the bible, what would happen to him? or even, lets say back in....800 ad for example, what happened to , for example, the japanese? they never had any opportunity to know anything about christianity. up until europeans started exploring (and conquering) the world, the rest of the world didnt really have any chance of knowing anything about christianity. what happened to these people?
*edit* i forgot my other question. i wonder, can a person who has never read the bible, and never met a christian, can they without either, come to be a christian on their own? can a person who is a blank slate, come to be a christian on their own, without any of these resources? or would you need someone and or the bible to teach you to become a christian?
Interesting question and my answer is yes and in the extreme cases that you present there is a test; as a Christian I believe that believe that God is almighty and that he saves whoever he has mercy on He is Sovereign Lord, isolation or remoteness are not an obstacle for God’s will, if he will that native in the Amazon is saved, that is what will happen, the Japanese, no problem, I also believe that to become a firm Christian you don’t need to know about Jesus or be taught how He is, what you need is an encounter with Him, to know Him, that He reveals Himself to you.
Jhn 8:19
Then they asked him, "Where is your father?" "You do not know me or my Father," Jesus replied. "If you knew me, you would know my Father also."
i dont see whats so extreme about the examples i give. up until the 1400's there was little to no chance of most of the world coming into contact with christianity.
from what ive learned and been told, one has to give himself to jesus to be saved. but you say that if you arent given the opportunity to learn anything about jesus, then god will give them a free pass? i dont quite understand that when a large part of being chrstian is knowing and giving yourself over to jesus.
you dont need to know anything about jesus? an encounter with him? if non christian people through history have had encounters with jesus, and thus being saved. then why is there no mention of jesus anywhere before christians europeans showed up?
what im asking is, if people over the world had a chance to "encounter" jesus, then why is there no mention of jesus anywhere in these places prior to christians showing up? if everyone in the world since jesus died had a chance to "encounter" him, why is his name never mentioned or his image not carved into stone, or his teachings not found anywhere prior to christianity showing up? why wasnt there jesus followers everywhere?
the OT is a purely tribal Hebrew god, and not for humanity. am i wrong?
why arent there jesus followers all over the world all throughout time?