• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

Guy Threepwood

Mighty Pirate
I don't get this argument. If the tuning had been different then perhaps life would have developed in a different form, or maybe not at all. But so what? The universe doesn't care either way.

alter the constants infinitesimally- and the universe wouldn't even have space/time- far less sentient life- a consciousness to literally care about itself with!
 

Guy Threepwood

Mighty Pirate
I'm not sure the constants are that sensitive, but the general point is true.

Difficult to nail down all the exact tolerances obviously, but Hawking considers the improbability practically infinite, hence the number of random multiverses that would be needed to fluke this one.
 

Sapiens

Polymathematician
Newton's laws were universally accepted as immutable without question, evolution is not even a majority belief yet, younger and less well established.
'without question' is not a very scientific approach is it?
All evolution is descent with modification, nothing more than a change in gene frequency over time ... that has occurred, and is occurring, without question.
 

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
no, just yet one more mind boggling coincidence without which we wouldn't be here pondering existence- I'm sure of it!

No matters what the current state of affairs is, it is a cohincidence. Your own existence, or the existence of anything else, including ugly things like the Ebola virus, is a huge cohincidence. The only way to avoid cohincidences is to not have anything existing at all.

Finding that mind boggling, a posteriori, is itself mind boggling.

Ciao

- viole
 

Sapiens

Polymathematician
who knows, perhaps by complete fluke- an asteroid was exactly aimed, weighted and timed to cleanly remove the physically dominant species that would otherwise rule indefinitely- leaving mankind with millions of years of the convenient resources we would need to explore and learn about creation.
And if my grandmother had two wheels she'd be a bicycle.
 

Guy Threepwood

Mighty Pirate
No matters what the current state of affairs is, it is a cohincidence. Your own existence, or the existence of anything else, including ugly things like the Ebola virus, is a huge cohincidence. The only way to avoid cohincidences is to not have anything existing at all.

Finding that mind boggling, a posteriori, is itself mind boggling.

Ciao

- viole

everything? what about the guy who is dating the lotto machine girl, and keeps winning the lottery, is that a coincidence?
 

JerryL

Well-Known Member
'insults are the most graceless form of conceding defeat' it is said
I'm not aware that you've quoted an insult. I could provide some actual insults for contrast if you like.

So where on the "how to concede defeat" chart does your red-herring fall?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
As in our examples- the amount of faith people put in theories has always been an important consideration, not acknowledging any only slows scientific progress

Either you are not aware of what a scientific theory is (most creationists either don't or deliberately refuse to use it) or you are just insisting on libel.
 

Guy Threepwood

Mighty Pirate
Can you explain the point of view that takes fossils of dinosaurs as evidence of ID?

we wouldn't be here discussing this, had dinosaurs not dominated for millions of years, while vast reserves of the sun's energy were conveniently stored for our use after they had been removed, allowing us to explore and appreciate creation as we can today.
 

Midnight Rain

Well-Known Member
of intelligent design or evolution


we wouldn't be here discussing this, had dinosaurs not dominated for millions of years, while vast reserves of the sun's energy were conveniently stored for our use after they had been removed, allowing us to explore and appreciate creation as we can today.
And if the Native American's hadn't discovered gunpowder then America wouldn't have been easily conquered and changed into a mostly European dominated nation while reaping the benefits of a mostly underused resources of a brand new continent. I hardly see how this is ID in the work. Seems far more likely that it was simply the procession of events.

And the majority of our fossil fuels come from tree's not dinosaurs. Their existence really didn't affect the creation of oil or coal.
 

McBell

Unbound
we wouldn't be here discussing this, had dinosaurs not dominated for millions of years, while vast reserves of the sun's energy were conveniently stored for our use after they had been removed, allowing us to explore and appreciate creation as we can today.
Care to actually answer the question?
 
Top