The vast majority of Christianity (at least 95%) do not believe in any of those things and the Bible forbids them beyond just about anything else. I have no idea what lessons can be taken from the slight exceptions and applied to the rule. You judge a teacher by the students that listen not by the ones that do the opposite.
Globally, sure. In PNG that is not accurate. We are talking a country where 96% of the population identify as Christian. Far higher than almost anywhere you could name. Religious education is taught throughout the school system.
Apart from that, less than 1% are Bahá'í, and there are maybe a couple of thousand Muslims in TOTAL, with almost all of those being immigrants.
In this overwhelmingly Christian country, you will receive as many stories as you like about personal experiences with God, Jesus, the Virgin Mary, etc. You will, from the
SAME SOURCES receive detailed descriptions of their personal experiences with sorcery, the conversations they have with ancestors and/or animalistic totems.
I am not sure what it is your trying to conclude. There are nuts in every group especially one as large and diverse as Christianity. I have no idea what the point of your premise is.
Colloquially, I would happily agree with you that the place is nuts. Completely. But talking more seriously, I cannot write off a country of 4 million people as an exception. They are currently holding a seminar on how to deal with sorcery-related killings, and are considering (or maybe already have) taken sorcery off the list of illegal activities. This is a primitive country, where Christianity has been introduced through sometimes dubious means, and sometimes in a sincere effort to assist and benefit the community. In both cases, this has led to the successful integration of Christianity into the community in a more comprehensive fashion than almost anywhere else you could point to.
As the country becomes more sophisticated, and more educated (assuming that actually occurs), the sophistication of their beliefs will similarly increase. Those professing to have spoken to their ancestors via pagan rituals will eventually be marginilised. Those professing to have spoken to God will not be.
Prior to Christian missionaries landing in PNG, exactly 0% of the population claimed to have experienced God. Amazingly, God started visiting after knowledge of him was communicated by gift-giving missionaries. Prior to Christian missionaries, ritualistic communication with ancestors and belief in sorcery was largely universal. It's still distressingly high (err...I could give a rats what people believe, but their belief in sorcery has unfortunate consequences, to say the least), but it is waning, replaced by more socially acceptable, and sophisticated beliefs.
I made no claims about sincere belief. I made a distinction between billions who claim to have had an experience and a few who have and between agreement with a intellectual proposition and a witnessed event.
I'm talking a whole, overwhelmingly Christian country. Sure, it's a dot in terms of total belief. But what sample size do I need? 4 million people is a significant sample size, and their exposure to Christianity is both more recent, and more immediately accessible to me from personal experience, as well as via the media (Australian sources...I'm sure PNG doesn't register much in the States, but it was an Australian protectorate until 1974).
My point is that our backgrounds and our beliefs seem to inform our experiences (certainly in terms of the supernatural, at least). I'm not seeking to convince you, but when you talk about people not having actually experienced the thunder and lightning God, you are talking in terms of absolute truth. They may very well believe that they have experienced it. This is the same light by which I see Christianity.
You can mention how there are billions of Christians, but it doesn't matter to me. I have named a country of 4 million Christians as an example that personal experience is not compelling.
IN terms of the OP, I would put up my hand and say I don't think I can prove there's no deity. I think I already have (who remembers?!). But the point I was trying to make is that there are SUBSTANTIAL numbers of people who honestly believe to have had experiences other than Christian in nature. Do I discount these?
Yes? But not Christian?
Why? Because of how many Christians there are? Nup...it's not compelling to me, at all. I have seen why people believe things...truth is generally down the list. I don't believe for a second that you would toss out your Christian beliefs if the world changed, and Islam became the most numerous religion. I wouldn't expect you to, and it wouldn't make logical sense to me. For myself, I am believing in what I have seen reason to believe in. Nothing more.