Cannabis is correlated with mental health disorders
1) Mental disorders are defined as discrete diseases with distinct etiologies. By definition, the correlation between any substance use and any mental health disorder that isn't a substance use disorder is spurious.
2) Drinking water is highly correlated with mental disorders. It's useless as a predictor of mental disorders. So is cannabis.
3) Large numbers of psychotropic medications are far, far more devastating to cognitive functioning than cannabis (ever seen the "thorazine shuffle" or the results of years of being on drugs for ADD/ADHD like methamphetamine salts, or the addiction and loss of cognitive function associated with the class of anti-anxiety medication called benzodiazepines, or the studies on the effects of powerful antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and even antidepressants on the brain?).
and is known to make them worse
Actually there are studies indicating that it is useful as a medication for mental health issues. Currently, such studies have nothing on the newest legalization of recreational drugs within psychiatry: Special K (ketamine). This horse tranquilizer and long-used recreational dissociative is now medicinal, approved by the FDA for depression and also as an analgesic.
Individuals who have displayed psychotic, irrational acts of violence, sharing a common factor in heavy use of cannabis, a mind-altering drug, cannot be so easily discarded as comparing it to them drinking water or other ordinary activities.
No, but ignorant individuals who haven't the foggiest idea about clinical psychology, psychiatry, neurology, or the neurosciences any more than they do the effects of both legal and illegal drugs on cognitive and brain functioning can be dismissed and easily discarded. Alcohol and many widely used psychotropic medications are legal and easily far more devastating in the known and possible ways in which they effect the brain.
The age-old mantra of "correlation is not causation" was used
...but it turned out predictive models and the testability of the carcinogenic effects of smoking rendered these arguments eventually meaningless. You haven't provided anything better than the tobacco industry (not as much, actually).
Also, I'd like to point out that I had to mention twice in my original post that I was not claiming cannabis had caused these acts of violence.
What you didn't point out is anything remotely resembling a good reason to take your assertions seriously.