My older brother joined the Freemasons, and I even visited his Masonic Lodge once. It was the same Masonic Lodge where John Wayne was inducted as a Freemason. My brother was trying to move up in business and he thought that joining the Masons would be advantageous in that regard and open up opportunities. He never mentioned much about their politics.
But as with any organization, there's the ordinary membership - the rank and file, and then there's the top level leadership which is where some of the attention might be placed. I suppose everyone has their own particular views and opinions on economics and politics, and if someone is in a position to influence others towards certain economic and/or political goals, then they might be inclined to use that influence. I would presume this to be true for the Pope, the leaders of the Masonic Lodge, or any political party or even social and civic organizations. Some organizations might make a conscious choice to avoid politics and present themselves as apolitical - even to the point of making it part of their bylaws. There are often good reasons for an organization to do so, although in practice, "apolitical" generally means they don't care if one is a Democrat or a Republican.