SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
That is true of many people like evolutionists.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
If you want to learn about human history read a book
If you have any questions about history ask someone who knows
The thing is you have zero interest in finding out
You simply don't want to know
All your questions are rhetorical
They are not "asked" in good faith
No, "evolutionists" (I.e. rational thinkers) dismiss ludicrous things as they are ludicrous
People like you dismiss evidenced and reasoned things as you desperately don't want them to be true
Big difference
Your data source is unsupported. Can you do better?
You didn't watch any of them, did you?
"There once was a young man named Fisk
Whose fencing was exceedingly brisk
So fast was is action, that Fitzgerald contraction, reduced his rapier to a disk."
Misleading. Often one side is poorly or completely unsupported. The truth is rarely found at the mid-point between the extremes
The non-occurrence of a worldwide flood is pretty cut and dry. There is no evidence whatsoever for such a flood, and such an event would have left massive evidence.
There would be mounds of evidence, and many familiar scientific disciplines would be turned on their heads.
Well, the dwellings and artifacts are plentiful. There's also voluminous evidence from other disciplines that obviate a young Earth.
No. "Evolutionists" strictly adhere to the objective evidence. Their every belief is strongly supported.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, the earliest calendars were not very sophisticated. No cats hanging on for dear life. No women in bikinis. Not even any puppies.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Yet scholars acknowledge that writing was not around until about 5,000 years ago. I have heard from believers in Darwinian type evolution that is because of the need for contracts. Nevertheless once again, gorillas and chimpanzees do not produce cities or write contracts.
"Mesopotamia was a region comprising many cultures over time speaking different languages. The earliest known writing was invented there around 3400 B.C. in an area called Sumer near the Persian Gulf."
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
There are various types of believers in whatever view they may have. I believe that only God can get a person to change thought direction in a certain sense. But a person does not have to take notice or move according to what is happening.
Have you ever played any of the Civilization games??????Yet scholars acknowledge that writing was not around until about 5,000 years ago. I have heard from believers in Darwinian type evolution that is because of the need for contracts. Nevertheless once again, gorillas and chimpanzees do not produce cities or write contracts.
"Mesopotamia was a region comprising many cultures over time speaking different languages. The earliest known writing was invented there around 3400 B.C. in an area called Sumer near the Persian Gulf."
The fact that you have no interest in history does not falsify evolution
So there was a point before which there was no writing........ so what???????
People can exist without knowing how to read and write
exchemist
Veteran Member
Spot-on!
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
And no count of years dating beyond 6000 years ago.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
You could try and keep it simple. And then when asked questions, explain in your own words with your own understanding. That's one possibility.
You do realise that calendars measure time and don't create it??????
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
So? HISTORY says that writing was begun about 3500 BCE. I didn't make it up, civilization games or not. (Have a good one.) Please do not think I'm going to continue this discussion like this. So again -- take care -- have a good evening.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That may be because writing is rather recent. There are artifacts that are older than 4,000 BCE that perform some of the work of calendars. Would that be good enough? Or are you simply going to make the silly demand that it has to be in writing?
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Good thing it's not counting time on Venus.
You'd have much bigger calendars, I suppose. "Venus rotates much more slowly than Earth does, so a day on Venus is much longer than a day on Earth. A day on Venus lasts for 243 Earth days or 5,832 hours!" Bigger clocks, too. maybe, unless scientists can figure a small clock counting 5,832 hours in a day. Maybe some will have a good time joking about that maybe. Ask an Astronomer!
I don't see how that date is relevant to the creation of the world
It is possible for people to exist without having calendars
There is tons of evidence of people who existed without them
And now you're throwing a strop and running away!