Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

[Subduction Zone]

It is post #1 in the other thread.

You have several thread. None of them have such an argument. If you had an irrefutable argument it was not there.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You have several thread. None of them have such an argument. If you had an irrefutable argument it was not there.

I only have 2 others. It is the irrefutable proof that used the law of non contradiction.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I only have 2 others. It is the irrefutable proof that used the law of non contradiction.

There was nothing that I or anyone else saw that fills that bill. Please copy and paste it. Or link to it. In case you forgot it is your claim. That means that it is your burden of proof.

 

[Jimmy]

We should always remind ourselves that some come here with predetermined "agendas" and not to have serious and intelligent discussions, thus beating them over the head is not going to help them gain objective insight.

Or some that just know the truth imo

 

[Jimmy]

No you didn’t, you assume and claim that your interpretation is correct, but fail to show you are correct to others. You are obligated to demonstrate your claims true. You making claims means nothing.

People that know the truth don’t need to show proof imo. So your statement means nothing

 

[Subduction Zone]

People that know the truth don’t need to show proof imo. So your statement means nothing

You would be wrong then. In fact that is what someone that only believed would say. If one knew then one would have no problem passing on that information. To me it looks as if you just admitted not to know.

 

[Jimmy]

Nope. It is why you are losing the debate. Every time you run away from learning the basics you are only telling everyone here that you are afraid to learn.

Creationism is for the weak in faith. The strong in faith believe in God no matter how he made the Earth. You have to call your own God a liar which is to say the least rather pathetic. One cannot reason rationally and consistently and be a YEC.

Weak in faith? Cannot reason? Haha. The truth is a bit deeper than a science book imo.

 

[Jimmy]

You would be wrong then. In fact that is what someone that only believed would say. If one knew then one would have no problem passing on that information. To me it looks as if you just admitted not to know.

Your statements in left field imo.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Weak in faith? Cannot reason? Haha. The truth is a bit deeper than a science book imo.

Not when it comes to basic facts. If you want to go into the ultimate cause you might have a point. But you clearly do not know that.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Your statements in left field imo.

But you do not understand science either. And you are quite wrong. My statement was dead on.

Why don't you support your belief? I am betting that the only thing that you know is that you know that you are wrong.

 

[Jimmy]

Not when it comes to basic facts. If you want to go into the ultimate cause you might have a point. But you clearly do not know that.

I know the ultimate cause.

 

[John53]

People that know the truth don’t need to show proof imo. So your statement means nothing

Why not?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I know the ultimate cause.

I know that you do not.

Two can play this game.

 

[Jimmy]

But you do not understand science either. And you are quite wrong. My statement was dead on.

Why don't you support your belief? I am betting that the only thing that you know is that you know that you are wrong.

Another left field statement

 

[Subduction Zone]

Why not?

I decided that I like his rule. It makes it so much easier to refute someone.

 

[Jimmy]

Why not?

Trying to Show proof for supernatural events is idiotic imo

 

[Subduction Zone]

Another left field statement

You need your glasses fixed.

Don't worry, I won't tell anyone how I know that you are wrong.

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

People that know the truth don’t need to show proof imo. So your statement means nothing

The issue I see with your assertion is that one person's truth is not everyone's truth. I see no reason to favor one claim over another.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Trying to Show proof for supernatural events is idiotic imo

"Supernatural" means "didn't really happen".

 

[Jimmy]

I decided that I like his rule. It makes it so much easier to refute someone.

Indeed. And I refute your “beliefs”