Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

[SkepticThinker]

You’re not to pleasant yourself

Nonsense. She's one of the most pleasant people on this entire forum.

Your attitude on the other hand ... well, you get what you give.

 

[Jimmy]

Nonsense. She's one of the most pleasant people on this entire forum.

Your attitude on the other hand ... well, you get what you give.

Ok

 

[Audie]

Never admitted. I know it exists.

Yet another who claims knowledge he possesseth not.

 

[Audie]

But just because I have religious beliefs that does not mean I am religious.
Religious people like going to religious observances and they like going to prayer meetings and study group meetings to study scriptures, which I find very boring. I do the very minimum, which is to attend Feasts every 19 days, and I usually attend those on Zoom, not in person.

Anyone with religious beliefs is religious.

 

[Audie]

These arguments feel like they’re more than 6,000 years old. Yawn.

Going by the layers of dust, manure, and mold
I'd say they've not aged well.

 

[F1fan]

Anyone with religious beliefs is religious.

It's odd how believers will deny being religious, as if religion is suddenly a bad thing to them, yet they still believe in reigious ideas. Or they accuse atheists of having faith, which only contaminates their own faith since they believe atheists are wrong via faith, so how reliable can faith be for them? They can't get out of their own way as they burn the bridge they are standing on.

 

[Jimmy]

Yet another who claims knowledge he possesseth not.

youre the one that blindly believes what science feeds you

 

[Jimmy]

It's odd how believers will deny being religious, as if religion is suddenly a bad thing to them, yet they still believe in reigious ideas. Or they accuse atheists of having faith, which only contaminates their own faith since they believe atheists are wrong via faith, so how reliable can faith be for them? They can't get out of their own way as they burn the bridge they are standing on.

Weak statement

 

[F1fan]

youre the one that blindly believes what science feeds you

Science has a strict methodology and it shows its work. the minimum statistical stand for success in testing is 99.95%.

Can you explain why any rational mind would not trust this system?

Can you offer any more reliable system of inquiry that offers us explanations of what is true about reality?

 

[F1fan]

Weak statement

Irony. Notice you didn't explain how it's weak, so I reject your superficial judgment as inadequate.

 

[Audie]

It's odd how believers will deny being religious, as if religion is suddenly a bad thing to them, yet they still believe in reigious ideas. Or they accuse atheists of having faith, which only contaminates their own faith since they believe atheists are wrong via faith, so how reliable can faith be for them? They can't get out of their own way as they burn the bridge they are standing on.

You left out creationists denying they
are creationists.

The core prob may be that religious
faith, being incompatible with intellectual
or moral integrity ( ie toxic) just contaminates
everything it touches.

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

youre the one that blindly believes what science feeds you

How do you know that's true? Can you justify your accusation?

Have you read her posts that suggest she "blindly believes" in science, or have you simply made an unfounded accusation?

 

[Sgt. Pepper]

Weak statement

Why do you think @F1fan's statement is weak? You didn't explain why in your post.

 

[Jimmy]

Irony. Notice you didn't explain how it's weak, so I reject your superficial judgment as inadequate.

You speak as if you’re this scientific genius when you’re having a normal conversation.

“Reject your superficial judgment as an adequate” haha

 

[SkepticThinker]

youre the one that blindly believes what science feeds you

Oh boy, another empty claim in the form of a one-liner.
Why do you believe everyone you've interacted with on this thread "blindly believes what science" feeds them? Explain yourself.

 

[SkepticThinker]

You speak as if you’re this scientific genius when you’re having a normal conversation.

“Reject your superficial judgment as an adequate” haha

Rightly so. You offered nothing of substance.

 

[Trailblazer]

Anyone with religious beliefs is religious.

True, but not all religious people are as religious as other religious people.

 

[Audie]

How do you know that's true? Can you justify your accusation?

Have you read her posts that suggest she "blindly believes" in science, or have you simply made an unfounded accusation?

Making things up is key.
You'd deprive them of their all?

 

[Subduction Zone]

youre the one that blindly believes what science feeds you

Why do you make that rather obviously false claim?

 

[F1fan]

You speak as if you’re this scientific genius when you’re having a normal conversation.

“Reject your superficial judgment as an adequate” haha

You sound jealous. You have been heavily criticized for your lack of understanding how debates work. It’s your responsibility to learn the rules.