Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

[Dan From Smithville]

It is my thought that they are not a Poe.
I suspect they are one of those who honestly think the more others disagree with them the more correct they have to be.

That's a good point and I have wondered about that too.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I was having the same thoughts myself. One only has to ask oneself "How would a twelve year old creationist react to that". Very little thought is required to be that sort of poe.

Whatever it may be, the position and application is half a bubble off of plumb or maybe several bubbles.

 

[McBell]

Whatever it may be, the position and application is half a bubble off of plumb or maybe several bubbles.

I would say several bubbles.
But then, that is understandable.
The more they think disagreement with them makes them correct the more they want it.
So much so they start making more and more ridiculous claims for no other reason than the "high" they get from being proven so correct.

 

[Valjean]

I have come to the conclusion that the statements many evolutionists say cannot be explained except by vast conjecture.

And your conclusions are based on your strong investment in a familiar mythology, in contradiction of the actual evidence. The "evolutionists" base their beliefs on actual observed, tested, dated evidence, which coïncides exactly with evidence from other disciplines.
Living things really do change over time. Species come and go, and not by magic.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

It's just an imaginative story in a book, given that our aborigines arrived here over 50,000 years before Adam's grandmother was a girl. And we all start off as female since we all have X chromosomes. Which is why some genetically male persons with Swyer syndrome can carry a pregnancy in their prostate-uterus.

About 30 trillion cells with sex chromosomes prove that a man cannot become a woman or a woman can become a man.
The evolutionists have devolved info lunacy.

 

[Subduction Zone]

About 30 trillion cells with sex chromosomes prove that a man cannot become a woman or a woman can become a man.
The evolutionists have devolved info lunacy.

You did not understand his post and you also demonstrated that you did not understand biology. Again.

 

[McBell]

About 30 trillion cells with sex chromosomes prove that a man cannot become a woman or a woman can become a man.
The evolutionists have devolved info lunacy.

And once again you speak without the first clue about that which you speak.
Sad really.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

And once again you speak without the first clue about that which you speak.
Sad really.

So a person does not have about 30 trillion cells in their body?

 

[Valjean]

About 30 trillion cells with sex chromosomes prove that a man cannot become a woman or a woman can become a man.
The evolutionists have devolved info lunacy.

Define "woman" and "man," please.

 

[McBell]

So a person does not have about 30 trillion cells in their body?

Please show that the 30 trillion cells "prove" a man cannot become a woman or a woman cannot become a man.
Keep in mind that you have to remain in the context of the post you made this claim against.

Here it is again so you can not claim ignorance of it:

It's just an imaginative story in a book, given that our aborigines arrived here over 50,000 years before Adam's grandmother was a girl. And we all start off as female since we all have X chromosomes. Which is why some genetically male persons with Swyer syndrome can carry a pregnancy in their prostate-uterus.​

 

[John53]

Please show that the 30 trillion cells "prove" a man cannot become a woman or a woman cannot become a man.
Keep in mind that you have to remain in the context of the post you made this claim against.

Here it is again so you can not claim ignorance of it:

And no assumptions!

 

[Monty]

About 30 trillion cells with sex chromosomes prove that a man cannot become a woman or a woman can become a man.
The evolutionists have devolved info lunacy.

So what sex are genetically male persons with Swyer syndrome (ie have Y chromosomes)?
Are they men or women, given that they have female genitalia and identify themselves as female, and some can even carry a pregnancy in their unmodified prostates and give birth through their unfused scrotums, and they sit down to urinate since there are no plumbing modifications to their penises? https://www.google.com.au/url?esrc=...YQFnoECAsQAg&usg=AOvVaw0X18_ugCMQQDf5jxEH5sas

 

[Mock Turtle]

So a person does not have about 30 trillion cells in their body?

Well yours are mostly hot air.

 

[YoursTrue]

This is another thing that puzzles me about the Genesis account. According to Genesis 2:18-20, God created all the animals and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them. Presumably God knew enough to create male and female animals, even though it had not yet occurred to him to create a female human. Perhaps Adam was observant enough to notice that there were anatomical differences between individual mammals of the same kind, and to wonder both what these differences meant and why there were no humans with the same anatomical structures as female mammals.

By the way, the grammar of your second sentence is incorrect. It should be either 'the woman came from the same genetic stock as the man' or 'the woman came from a different genetic stock from the man'.

Thanks for correction about grammar. I was finding the wording a little difficult. Regarding the taking of a female from Adam's rib, I understand that human ribs can regenerate. Yet Moses wrote this. Sorry if my terminology is not 100% correct. However the Bible has it, I find it rather interesting that it was written a rib was used. They weren't scientists. But it was said Eve came from Adam's rib. Which can replenish itself within the structure. Sorry for maybe wrong terminology but please note the following:

"Fractures to major bones often heal slowly or incompletely, especially in older people, and large bone injuries do not repair naturally. By comparison, rib bones show an unusual capacity to regrow and repair themselves even when a large portion is damaged." Ribs hold the key to better bone healing.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Thanks for correction about grammar. I was finding the wording a little difficult. Regarding the taking of a female from Adam's rib, I understand that human ribs can regenerate. Yet Moses wrote this. Sorry if my terminology is not 100% correct. However the Bible has it, I find it rather interesting that it was written a rib was used. They weren't scientists. But it was said Eve came from Adam's rib. Which can replenish itself within the structure. Sorry for maybe wrong terminology but please note the following:

"Fractures to major bones often heal slowly or incompletely, especially in older people, and large bone injuries do not repair naturally. By comparison, rib bones show an unusual capacity to regrow and repair themselves even when a large portion is damaged." Ribs hold the key to better bone healing.

Sometimes myths get lucky.

But seriously, the story made all sorts of claims. That one of them is not 100% wrong is not amazing and is not evidence for the Bible.

 

[YoursTrue]

This is another thing that puzzles me about the Genesis account. According to Genesis 2:18-20, God created all the animals and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them. Presumably God knew enough to create male and female animals, even though it had not yet occurred to him to create a female human. Perhaps Adam was observant enough to notice that there were anatomical differences between individual mammals of the same kind, and to wonder both what these differences meant and why there were no humans with the same anatomical structures as female mammals.

By the way, the grammar of your second sentence is incorrect. It should be either 'the woman came from the same genetic stock as the man' or 'the woman came from a different genetic stock from the man'.

I can't explain certain things in the Bible as if I were an eye witness but then neither can scientists explain without doubt many of their posits. By explain, yes, I also mean prove in the generic sense, meaning provide evidence without a doubt as to how or what happened. For instance, the famous chart showing how apes evolved straightening up eventually by evolution to humans. There are fossils of sorts claimed by scientists to be whatever they categorize them as, but these are not proof of humans evolving from whatever they say they evolved from. Since there are no videos taken the evidence fitted and categorized by some scientists is conjecture. And, as some say, the common ancestor among apes is currently not found. Yet chimps remain chimps so far. Gorillas remain gorillas. And so forth.

 

[YoursTrue]

So what sex are genetically male persons with Swyer syndrome (ie have Y chromosomes)?
Are they men or women, given that they have female genitalia and identify themselves as female, and some can even carry a pregnancy in their unmodified prostates and give birth through their unfused scrotums, and they sit down to urinate since there are no plumbing modifications to their penises? https://www.google.com.au/url?esrc=...YQFnoECAsQAg&usg=AOvVaw0X18_ugCMQQDf5jxEH5sas

There are aberrations in reproduction now. That does not confirm the darwinian model of evolution.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Well yours are mostly hot air.

What was the first living thing and what features did it have?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

What was the first living thing and what features did it have?

Are you going to respond respectfully and objectively to any answers you get or just dismiss it with your declarations of victory and repetition?

Are you in any way qualified to evaluate the responses you do get?

 

[YoursTrue]

Sometimes myths get lucky.

But seriously, the story made all sorts of claims. That one of them is not 100% wrong is not amazing and is not evidence for the Bible.

The Genesis account does tell that the writer many centuries ago seemed to knew an amazing feature of the rib to regenerate itself.
Glad you recognized that. Now ask me: do I understand in detail everything written in the Bible? You guessed correctly!! No. I do not. Take care. Oh, and how do I know what you might think? I figured based upon past conversations with you. Scientific method? Hmm, I don't particularly think so. Female institution? Although I'm a female, I think almost anybody could guess it.