• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.

Bthoth

Well-Known Member
In the worldwide flood which proves the worldwide flood. That happened about 4500 years ago. That is a great proof that evolution and billons of years are false.
There has never been a worldwide flooding. Absolutely no proof no matter how you convey it. There have been many floods and I would accept that Enlil caused a flood because mankind was noisy over the genesis story of an ark with 2 of every creature.

Keep in mind, that story existed before the torah of the bible ever did
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
It is a real scientific instrument which teaches real science.

There is too much helium in radioactive rocks. Why?

There is helium in old zircon crystals. Why?

Thick sedimentary rock layers bent beyond the fracturing point, yet not fractured. Why?
What makes you think that they should not be there.

And rocks deform under a combination of heat and pressure. They bend. They were clearly not loose sediments. Bend those and the material pinches out at the tops and bottoms of bends.

Do you realize that fossils are even more brittle than the rocks that hold them?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member

Challenge met.
/Thread.
Bad source they have the datings all wrong because they have the bad no God assumption.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Are you using science to prove a person wrong?

Was it katrina as the flood. To the folk in the low lying areas it may have felt like it was worldwide
If the first living thing was just proteins, how did it ever get evolve to use RNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Cute. Oxford has many bibles and i am confident that more people of oxford have read the bible more often than you have even picked it up
If it was RNA based, how did it to ever evolve to use DNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.
 
Top