Because you get science wrong.
Because you get science wrong.
Because you get science wrong, and that's why you lose these dabtes.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Challenge for those that believe in billions of years for the age of things. Give anything that is more than 6000 years old. NO ASSUMPTIONS ALLOWED.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Where did the laws of nature come from?
Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?
Where did all energy come from?
Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?
Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?
are you lost?
You picked on Oxford as a source and you wrote: 'Bad source they have the datings all wrong because they have the bad no God assumption'
Did god inspire you?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Prove that DNA is irreducibly complex. You will win a Nobel Prize.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Anyone who knows codes knows that.
If the first living thing was just proteins, how did it ever get evolve to use RNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.
If it was RNA based, how did it to ever evolve to use DNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.
It it was just proteins, how did it to ever evolve to use DNA and RNA? They are irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
LMAO! Why do you keep using arguments that refute your God.
You need to slow down. You are panicking again. Just because you are incredibly wrong and ignorant is no reason to get excited.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
More nonsense from a losing position.
If the first living thing was just proteins, how did it ever get evolve to use RNA and DNA? They are irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.
If it was just RNA based, how did it to ever evolve to use DNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.
If it was just DNA based, how did it to ever evolve to use RNA? It is irreducibly complex. You need all the parts to be working for it not to be destruction.
It is was any mix, then how could it have evolved at all?
Be patience, he did use the cup of water and handful of sand to comprehend sedimentary layers. No bible taught him that.
Maybe his inspirations are crossing up. Unknowingly he is observing science to write these posts beyond religious opinion. Eventually the learning curve will set in.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
The Bible predicted in Daniel 12 that knowledge shall be increased, and this includes scientific knowledge.
Now note that Gentry got the idea that it proved the instantaneous creation of the earth from the Bible. See Psalm 33:9.
And Gentry also got the idea that it proved the flood from the flood description in Gen 6-8.
Also Gentry figured out that the 10 commandments were written on stone and probably granite.
The 4th commandment says that God created all things in 6 days, so Gentry noted that the Earth was created on day 1. See Exodus 20:10 and Genesis .
So amazingly, God wrote the 10 commandments including the 4th commandment on granite instantaneously created when the Earth was created with very many parentless polonium radio haloes in the granite which proves 6 day creation about 6000 years ago And refutes evolution and billions of years.
Robert Gentry showed that parentless polonium 210, 214, and 218 radio haloes must be primordial based on the decay rates of the isotopes in the decay chain.
And he gave a simple falsification test that has yet been met. This test should be child’s play today. Not only can they not produce the granite with even one polonium 218 halo, they can’t even make that type of granite with the coarse grain.
How do you explain that?
Also he showed, using some polonium halos which are not primordial, that the rock layers are from the flood and laid down within a period of about 1 year.
If Gentry’s reasoning is correct, he has found direct evidence for the instantaneous creation of the Earth and of the worldwide flood.
There are many trillions and trillions of these halos in granite rocks all around the world.
I guess you have not read his book?
If you do you would know that Gentry faced a lot of censorship in many forms.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You misunderstood. You need to have been following the discussion.
He is asking that kind of question. His questions have false assumptions in them. He knows this. If I asked you "Have you quit beating your wife yet?" and demanded a Yes or No answer you couldn't (hopefully) answer since both answers imply that you have beaten your wife. His questions far too often have false accusations in them.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Nonsensical non-answer.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
You joking about wife beating is pretty wicked. Knock it off. It is offensive and insensitive.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
It's a common phrase meant to make a point. That you missed, apparently.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It is not code. That is just an analogy. You remember, analogies are one of the tools that you can not understand.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Try this. Have you stopped being a monkey yet?
Sometimes phrases come into being with out much thought.
Have you stopped being a monkey yet?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It is not a joke. It is an analogy. It would be offensive if I was serious.. I am glad that you realize that you have been asking offensive questions.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
I told you. Your choice.
Where are all the structures that the built? The pyramids are about 4200 years old. How did they go from nothing to that? And this phenomenon occurs in many parts of the world about the same time?
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
I'm a Great Ape. So are you.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
LOL!! You don't understand that you still are a monkey. So is everyone else.
Nice shooting. You just got a toe with that one.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
There are structures far older than that.