Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Choosing to be offended over something so petty or trivial isn't "hurt".It is freedom of speech, but when it is done to hurt others, then it is not ok
Let the *****-tears flow.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Choosing to be offended over something so petty or trivial isn't "hurt".It is freedom of speech, but when it is done to hurt others, then it is not ok
Seriously? Go back and read. For God's sake man. Here it is for you if you are just too lazy:What lesson was that?
Read it, re-read it if you have to, understand it. Have it now, or do you need to ask again for some ridiculous reason?Howard Is said:freedom from superstitious belief enrages superstitious believers
Or better yet....Choosing to be offended over something so petty or trivial isn't "hurt".
Let the *****-tears flow.
Threats now ...Did they not learn anything last time?
More the recognition of the threat posed.Threats now ...
No problem. Just learn from your mistake. Don't pretend you have no idea what the topic is just to try and do what you think is "forcing someone's hand." The information was readily available, and the thread was only 2 pages long by that time. You were obviously trying to enact some kind of undermining of the point made, or trying to trap someone into offending you or something. I honestly have no idea... I only know I smelled shenanigans in the works. As a matter of fact, the scent still lingers.Wow, I'm really sorry for having offended you this seriously!
I 'm sorry I made a mistake. I didn't know this lesson is such a big deal for you.
What is weak about ignoring it?Islam say portrait of the prophet is not right to do, what is weak about following the teaching?
When will this ****ty "satire" magazine stop harasment of the Prophet Muhammad?
Again they are planning to re publication of the idiotic drawings from 2015. Did they not learn anything last time?
Okay, in light of that response, I retract my apology.
Hahaha... good for you. Next.Okay, in light of that response, I retract my apology.
Yea, you're a waste of time, too.
That teaching is for Muslims. Not for non-Muslims. You don't force that view on others. You don't kill others who have no obligation to follow the rules imposed upon Muslims.Islam say portrait of the prophet is not right to do, what is weak about following the teaching?
It is freedom of speech, but when it is done to hurt others, then it is not ok
To republish may be to show that the intimidation did not work, but to republish seems also to show a lack of care for the employees at Hedbo.
I'll wager that they take precautions against violent backlash.I don't know that it was originally drawn to hurt others but the bomb was definitely to hurt others.
To republish may be to show that the intimidation did not work, but to republish seems also to show a lack of care for the employees at Hedbo.
I guess that's the French for you, Liberty or die,,,,,,,,,,,or in this case Liberty and die.
It is freedom of speech, but when it is done to hurt others, then it is not ok
"I won't draw pictures of Muhammad myself" - perfectly acceptable.Islam say portrait of the prophet is not right to do, what is weak about following the teaching?
It is freedom of speech, but when it is done to hurt others, then it is not ok
Maybe Muhammad is not upset, but why create hate when Charlie be do know what will happen?
No I say respect others the way you want to be respected your self
He's recognizing the existence of the threat.Is that a threat? It sure sounds like a threat.
I have never said you or other have to follow Islamic teaching, but I do not understand why people can not respect that Muslims should not create picture of Muhammad, you do not need to follow a teaching to show respect to what it say.What is weak about ignoring it?