• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Charlie Hebdo 'wins' the Islamophobia Award 2015

NoX

Active Member
Mostly because it's pretty hard to stop someone from leaving the country unless they are subject to 24h observation.

Why did Turkey let him cross the border?

Here the most remarkable thing is that UK allows a terrorist to live there. Other things comes after. Why would UK allow a terrorist to live in the capital city ? :eek:

Okay lets say you said "because of this because of that" and convinced all the World with the help of some stories and with the help of media power :p, then why would they not follow the terrorist which they allow to live there ? not 24 hours but even for 25 hours you have to follow a terrorist. How come UK is such self-confident and they are quite cool with this situation ? How they are such sure that this terrorist wont attack them ? :rolleyes: Maybe because of this terrorist is their man ? Ops !!! :bustsilhouette:

How you know he was crossed the border from Turkiye ? and why would you expect Turkiye to not to allow him to go Syria while UK cannot do the same thing ? Do you ask the same question to UK ? :p Maybe another British agent helped him to go Syria by using his British passport ? :rolleyes: Maybe he crossed the border through Jordan, this was also something know that Israel train ISIS members in Jordan but our cute little mice Canadian agent tell us so interesting things about Jordan :kissing:
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Actually I'm jumping much more long than you realized :runner: I do not says Canada working with ISIS, I say Britain working with ISIS :oops: :rolleyes:
:handpointup:
:handpointup:

:handpointup:
:handpointup:
Same difference I guess. So, you have no reasonable reason for making this claim? No supporting evidence that is objective? Even subjective evidence like an opinion piece would suffice.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Quite possible , nothing surprises if considering that, the head cutter John lived in London, near of Parliament building and intelligence building :p why would Britain allow and ex Al Shabaab member to go Syria :eek: thought provoking.
What do you mean "allow?" They probably were just unable to detain him legally.
 
Here the most remarkable thing is that UK allows a terrorist to live there. Other things comes after. Why would UK allow a terrorist to live in the capital city ? :eek:

Okay lets say you said "because of this because of that" and convinced all the World with the help of some stories and with the help of media power :p, then why would they not follow the terrorist which they would allow to live there ? not 24 hours but even for 25 hours you have to follow a terrorist. How come UK is such self-confident and they are quite cool with this situation ? How they are such sure that this terrorist wont attack them ? :rolleyes: Maybe because of this terrorist is their man ? Ops !!! :bustsilhouette:

How you know he was crossed the border from Turkiye ? and why would you expect Turkiye to not to allow him to go Syria while UK cannot do the same thing ? Do you ask the same question to UK ? :p Maybe another British agent helped him to go Syria by using his British passport ? :rolleyes: Maybe he crossed the border through Jordan, this was also something know that Israel train ISIS members in Jordan but our cute little mice Canadian agent tell us so interesting things about Jordan :kissing:

Probability says he crossed from Turkey, until recently they made no attempt to stop people and practically encouraged them. I wouldn't expect Turkey to stop anyone, usually too busy imprisoning journalists and inventing stories about who 'discovered' America :sailboat:

As for how did he live in London, probably because he was a British citizen who grew up and went to school there. Maybe MI5 'groomed' him from an early age, probably with help from the Queen, the Mossad, the CIA, freemasons and giant Jewish lizards :dragon::sixpointedstar::smilingimp:
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Probability says he crossed from Turkey, until recently they made no attempt to stop people and practically encouraged them. I wouldn't expect Turkey to stop anyone, usually too busy imprisoning journalists and inventing stories about who 'discovered' America :sailboat:

As for how did he live in London, probably because he was a British citizen who grew up and went to school there. Maybe MI5 'groomed' him from an early age, probably with help from the Queen, the Mossad, the CIA, freemasons and giant Jewish lizards :dragon::sixpointedstar::smilingimp:
You forgot the shape-shifters... jus' sayin'...
I've just sent Comrade Harper a email saying that he better clean up Mossad because the Turks are on to the game.
 

NoX

Active Member
Probability says he crossed from Turkey, until recently they made no attempt to stop people and practically encouraged them. I wouldn't expect Turkey to stop anyone, usually too busy imprisoning journalists and inventing stories about who 'discovered' America :sailboat:

As for how did he live in London, probably because he was a British citizen who grew up and went to school there. Maybe MI5 'groomed' him from an early age, probably with help from the Queen, the Mossad, the CIA, freemasons and giant Jewish lizards :dragon::sixpointedstar::smilingimp:

I think the word "probability" is another way to say "conspiracy". :p we call them as agent or tong those who you call as "journalist". Journalism is an interesting profession and one of the most popular profession to hide your actual identity :smile: Turkiye is quite free country about journalism as long as your journalism does not exceeds the limit and does not aims to disturb social order, does not aim to false propagandas. We dont believe in freedom of speech, we believe in freedom of expression. You cant say whatever you want but you should have to explain your ideas about everything. And yes, Muslims and Turks discovered American first but you know Media is capable to put foreground whoever it want :blush:
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
I think the word "probability" is another way to say "conspiracy". :p we call them as agent or tong those who you call as "journalist". Journalism is an interesting profession and one of the most popular profession to hide your actual identity :smile: Turkiye is quite free country about journalism as long as your journalism does not exceeds the limit and does not aims to disturb social order, does not aim to false propagandas. We dont believe in freedom of speech, we believe in freedom of expression. You cant say whatever you want but you should have to explain your ideas about everything. And yes, Muslims and Turks discovered American first but you know Media is capable to put foreground whoever it want :blush:
I have a lot of questions, but my main one is this. What do you mean by "Muslims and Turks discovered America first"? Also, what evidence do you have to support this? I almost hate to ask, as you don't seem to be a fan of providing evidence to support your positions, but here's hopeing.
 

NoX

Active Member
I have a lot of questions, but my main one is this. What do you mean by "Muslims and Turks discovered America first"? Also, what evidence do you have to support this? I almost hate to ask, as you don't seem to be a fan of providing evidence to support your positions, but here's hopeing.

I do not mean anything. Yes Turks were/are quite effective on the seas, in past times and today. We had/have great sailors. But I'm not interested to discuss about this issue currently, under such an irrelevant topic, but I would suggest you to research Barry Fell's studies from Harvard.
 

NoX

Active Member
<source>

It doesn't sound like too many have taken his work particularly seriously.

Then why someones does not help him about the issue ? Maybe they were just trying to cover up his studies.:p He is a prof and if a prof claims somethings, it should be investigated. :rolleyes: Your Wikipedia does not offer a way to solve issue or other sources or studies about ancient ruins, its just trying to discredit a professor.

As I said I dont want to discuss that, there are many other clues, this was just one of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Then why someones does not help him about the issue ? Maybe they were just trying to cover up his studies.:p He is a prof and if a prof claims somethings, it should be investigated, is not it Jewo ? :rolleyes: Your Wikipedia does not offer a way to solve issue or other sources or studies about ancient ruins, its just trying to discredit a professor.

As I said I dont want to discuss that, there are many other clues, this was just one of them.
I think that the problem people have with your reasoning is that you are satisfied with something merely making sense to you. If evidence is not required for inferences of this nature, the inferences themselves are without merit. This frustrates people on this site, because most are here to learn and debate religious/historical topics. When you just present a claim that could be possible and fail to produce evidence that, not only shows it possible, but likely compared to other claims, it makes people think you are being unfair.

And, just to be clear, there are plenty of professors in the world that should most certainly be ignored. Not to say that this is one of them, but being a professor does not automatically give your claims importance.
 
Top