• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Charlie Hebdo 'wins' the Islamophobia Award 2015

NoX

Active Member
Care to share a source on any of this?

Well yes I already know the answer but I feel like I got to ask.

There are hundreds of pages of researches about Turkiye done by Churchill. His testament for Britons was to control Turkiye, not to allow Turks to get stronger which will be a great danger for Europe and not to allow Turks weaken so much that they cannot be effective on ME, Balkan region (eastern Europe) and Caucasus region (eastern Russia). If Turks starts to get stronger, then every way can be used to stop them. They certainly must not be allowed to get strong. Their national and spiritual values should be forgotten to them, their history should be forgetten to them, ethnic and sectarian incitement must be fueled, ideology and different power struggles should be increased, even civil wars should be started or they should be forced to fight with their neighboring countries.


and today we are getting stronger with each passing day, Churchill plan fails, its red alert position for Churchill men and they need to start conflicts in Turkiye against the government, or they should put Turkiye in a war against its neighbors, this is why someones persistently wants Turkiye to join Syria and fight against ISIS :oops: :rolleyes:
 

NoX

Active Member
Well, I did say that we have a serious problem with shape-shifting Jews in Canada. To think the individual is working on behalf of the Harper government is astounding. Shocking really.

Nope he is not a Jewish agent. I could tell you about our memories with Jewish agents in lasts months but you wont like it :p ask it to your president and ask him why they need to make some changes on the structure of Mossad. This person is a Syrian and his name is Mohammad Al Rashed. He admitted that he is working for Canadian intelligence service and often goes to Jordan to the Canadian Embassy and gives report to the Canadian officials. Our securty forces find the pictures of 20 persons on his laptop, a mobile phone and messages sent to Canadian intelligence, photos of airline tickets. We also find out that someones with Arabic names from UK sent him money so many times through the agency of Western Union Bank, Moneygram, Bank Asya, Turkiye Finans.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
But the point he was an agent, not a normal terrorist, he is a terrorist working for Canada.




Yes, I need to study more about World Wars :flushed: but probably this wont change my views about Churchill. His purpose was not only to save Britain from Nazis. His purpose was to speed up the collapse of Ottoman and taking Turks under control, therefore dominating the ME.:relieved:

According to his archive in London, he says "Turks will never be destroyed complately, those who tries to do that , will be prevented by British army. Turkiye will continue to live as a country connected to Britain, because those who control Turkiye, control the ME." $$$ :hearteyes:

Today what our president does, is cleaning up Turkiye from Britons and some others(?). This is why some US newspapers, all of UK newspapers and some other (?) newspapers attack continuously Erdogan. Media and Money is the most important two tools to control the World.
His job as Prime Minister was to do what was in Brittains best interest. And, from the quote, it sounds like he was willing to put Brittish lives in danger to protect Turkey. I still fail to see how he did anything unethical, taking into consideration that the world was a very different place back then.
 

NoX

Active Member
His job as Prime Minister was to do what was in Brittains best interest. And, from the quote, it sounds like he was willing to put Brittish lives in danger to protect Turkey. I still fail to see how he did anything unethical, taking into consideration that the world was a very different place back then.

LoL are you aware of it that you started to drool in your last posts to defend him :D and nope, he was not putting the lifes of Britons in danger for Turks, The Royal Army includes about 600.000 Muslim soldiers all over the World, even Turkiye or Pakistan does not have such a big Muslim army :p They have about 400.000 soldiers from the Island, but they have about 3 Million soldiers from other countries (from their colonies) :confused:
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
LoL are you aware of it that you started to drool in your last posts to defend him :D and nope, he was not putting the lifes of Britons in danger for Turks, The Royal Army includes about 600.000 Muslim soldiers all over the World, even Turkiye or Pakistan does not have such a big Muslim army :p They have about 400.000 soldiers from the Island, but they have about 3 Million soldiers from other countries (from their colonies) :confused:
But they were all part of the Brittish Empire, correct?
 
Iam one of those who are against the paris attacks. But somehow charlie hebdo asked for it. They knew there are certain groups who kills both muslims and non-muslims. So they had it coming.

If someone says "I didn't support the attacks but they had it coming", they supported the attacks.

why Britain the most powerful military of NATO is not a part of coalition ? Maybe they have some secrets about ISIS which is not known by others ? :rolleyes:

Nice theory, but undermined the fact that they are part of the coalition and are one of the biggest contributors. See 'operation shader'.
 

NoX

Active Member
Nice theory, but undermined the fact that they are part of the coalition and are one of the biggest contributors. See 'operation shader'.

I know they are the part of coalition but **** said they are not :p Also **** could be considered as a kind justified. Because UK is a part of coalition on the paper, but they are just trying to be look like they are the part of coalition :expressionless: they dont even have an approved permit by their parliament to perform an airstrike against ISIS. So if today it was needed for UK to attack against ISIS, they cannot do that :kissing:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

NoX

Active Member
Still no source on the alleged Canadian official working for IS.


Ah well...

So what kind of a source do you want ? A signed paper by God ? :pointup: these things are describes by official persons. Do not trust our NATO allies to us ? :kissingclosed:
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
So what kind of a source do you want ? A signed paper by God ? :pointup: these things are describes by official persons. Do not trust our NATO allies to us ? :kissingclosed:
You are making a huge leap from reason. There is merely indication that a Canadian Official was lured in by ISIS. How do you get from there to the Canadian Government working with ISIS?

And, in terms of a source, you merely need to provide a newspaper article from a reputable news organization. Without any evidence, your word on a conpiracy theory is pretty unsubstantial. It doesn't prove anything.
 

NoX

Active Member
You are making a huge leap from reason. There is merely indication that a Canadian Official was lured in by ISIS. How do you get from there to the Canadian Government working with ISIS?

And, in terms of a source, you merely need to provide a newspaper article from a reputable news organization. Without any evidence, your word on a conpiracy theory is pretty unsubstantial. It doesn't prove anything.

Actually I'm jumping much more long than you realized :runner: I do not says Canada working with ISIS, I say Britain working with ISIS :oops: :rolleyes:
:handpointup:
:handpointup:
:handpointup:Do you think that is a bad thing? Why did you point this out?
:handpointup:
:handpointup:
 
Last edited:
Also Jewo could be considered as a kind justified. Because UK is a part of coalition on the paper, but they are just trying to be look like they are the part of coalition :expressionless: they dont even have an approved permit by their parliament to perform an airstrike against ISIS. So if today it was needed for UK to attack against ISIS, they cannot do that :kissing:

If 'on paper' means more airstrikes than anyone except America and a couple of hundred bombs dropped on ISIS then they are only an 'on paper' partner. Was voted on 6 months ago.

I say Britain working with ISIS :oops: :rolleyes:

I heard that the Queen and Prince Charles are personally organising the defence of Mosul and have organised an entire battalion of freemasons and giant lizards willing to conduct 'martyrdom operations' :bomb::pointup::bomb:

Think Hilary Clinton is there too as she was responsible for the creation of ISIS...
 

NoX

Active Member
If 'on paper' means more airstrikes than anyone except America and a couple of hundred bombs dropped on ISIS then they are only an 'on paper' partner. Was voted on 6 months ago.

I heard that the Queen and Prince Charles are personally organising the defence of Mosul and have organised an entire battalion of freemasons and giant lizards willing to conduct 'martyrdom operations' :bomb::pointup::bomb:

Think Hilary Clinton is there too as she was responsible for the creation of ISIS...

Quite possible , nothing surprises if considering that, the head cutter John lived in London, near of Parliament building and intelligence building :p why would Britain allow and ex Al Shabaab member to go Syria :eek: thought provoking.
 
Quite possible , nothing surprises if considering that, the head cutter John lived in London, near of Parliament building and intelligence building :p why would Britain allow and ex Al Shabaab member to go Syria :eek: thought provoking.

Mostly because it's pretty hard to stop someone from leaving the country unless they are subject to 24h observation.

Why did Turkey let him cross the border?
 
Top