Many medical issues and conditions can cause dysphagia, such as a stroke. Everyone also chokes on their food or drink on occasion, proper chewing or not.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Chicken wings advertised as 'boneless' can have bones, Ohio Supreme Court decides
- Thread starter The Sum of Awe
- Start date
Many medical issues and conditions can cause dysphagia, such as a stroke. Everyone also chokes on their food or drink on occasion, proper chewing or not.
No, she told me that I had to chew properly and not pig it down
Basic table manners
I worked out how to swallow on my own
Even younger friend. Your mother taught you the basics of physically swallowing. As I have been doing with my own son.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Hmm, are you sure that you were not "eating like a pig". You know Ockham's Razor and all of that.
As I said, I did not feel that much for the man originally but I was ironically shown the error in my ways.
Pacing, timing, breathing, these are things you teach an infant.
You are "taught" to swallow.
You are "taught" to swallow.
Going to also leave this here:
www.simplypsychology.org
Fundamental Attribution Error Theory in Psychology
The fundamental attribution error (also known as correspondence bias or over-attribution effect) is the tendency for people to over-emphasize dispositional or
www.simplypsychology.org
Last edited:
Seems like a way of weaseling out of taking responsibility for your own human errorGoing to also leave this here:
Fundamental Attribution Error Theory in Psychology
The fundamental attribution error (also known as correspondence bias or over-attribution effect) is the tendency for people to over-emphasize dispositional or
No, it isn't. It's called understanding that actual causality is complicated and doesn't ever rest on a single factor. In fact, one of the major things you will learn if you study a lot of psychology at the college level is that the majority of human behavior is explained by environmental or situational factors over individual factors. Our professor called it the 70-30 rule, as loosely, 70% of human behavior is environmental and only 30% of it is personality or individual. We spent a lot of time going over example upon example of this because Americans in particular really, really overestimate how much personality or the individual matters. At no point was this cast as not "taking responsibility" but as actually bothering to understand the real world and its complexity. Hell, if anything, understanding the complexity is about actually taking responsibility appropriately and not piling everything onto one thing. Causality is complicated. Victim blaming is stupid for that reason if no other. Never mind it is utterly heartless and is a diagnostic red flag for anti-social personality disorder.
A big part of being an adult is taking responsibility for what you do and not shifting it on to others
The mentality you have just described is just a glossy way of not taking responsibility for yourself when you **** up
It's not healthy, not honest, not grown up
There are lots of things in my life that I could tenuously blame on society or other individuals but I don't because I am a responsible adult, my mistakes are my mistakes, never mind the 70/30 thing you mentioned
A big part of being an adult is taking responsibility for what you do and understanding how other factors are also responsible. To not couch oneself in simplistic, black-and-white, either-or thinking when reality is more complicated than that. A surefire way to leave yourself vulnerable to abuse by others is to fail to take into account externalities and put everything on your own shoulders.
No, it isn't. It's called understanding reality is complicated and every situation has many causal variables that play into it. It's called not opening yourself up to becoming a complete doormat because you refuse to accept that how others treat you matters (and by extension, how you treat others matters). It's called not giving abusers and socipaths a free pass. Or a bad living environment a free pass. It's basically called not giving anything a free pass. Not yourself, not others, not your culture, not your environment.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
That isn't common knowledge. I only know it because I've done construction work, where this fact is very likely more widely known than it is among the general populace.
Again, not common. I don't like olives amd thus this I did not know.
That's the problem with common knowledge. It's not common.
We already have laws against false advertising.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
If you have a reasonable expectation of something, in this case being told the meat your being served is boneless, it is up to the one making the claim. If someone chokes on a bone that is because the reasonable expectations of the product were violated. It's fine to call bull****. Suing everyone including the farmer is wrong, but the customers (including the restaurant) were sold the meat under the assumption they are boneless. Where is it wrong to call this out?
Among people who don't do carpentry.
For them, it doesn't matter.
It reminds me of a legal theory I learned in
a law class.....
An old woman sued a dealer because her car
could only go 145 mph, but was advertised to
go 150 mph.
Judge: "What's the fastest you ever drive?"
Lady: "75"
Judge: "Case dismissed. You've no loss."