China Places Country Dangerously Close To US Warship

[Audie]

I know you are not American, but you seem to think that they are the guardians of international waters, which is unrealistic and not how the world works. Corporate interests are protected, beyond that other countries are at their mercy.

Whatevs.
You've your opinions x bias x ideology.

 

[Audie]

There are some posters with whom productive
discussion is just difficult to achieve. We can't
speculate about all the reasons....rules, ya know.

Yep

 

[lukethethird]

Whatevs.
You've your opinions x bias x ideology.

I don't believe and go along with the status quo, if that's what you mean.

 

[Wu Wei]

I don't believe and go along with the status quo, if that's what you mean.

Let me help, that is not what she means...TTFN

 

[Audie]

I don't believe and go along with the status quo, if that's what you mean.

Clueless.
Not even remotely right.
A clue for you, though, to why the creationist comparison.

And another ttfn for you.

 

[lukethethird]

Clueless.
Not even remotely right.
A clue for you, though, to why the creationist comparison.

And another ttfn for you.

I'm not clueless, I watch CNN, I just don't buy into the BS.

 

[Stevicus]

I'm not clueless, I watch CNN, I just don't buy into the BS.

One thing I keep in mind is that people are often like nations. Some like to talk about things in earnest, while there are others who just like to engage in hostile rhetoric, just because they enjoy it.

 

[Audie]

I'm not clueless, I watch CNN, I just don't buy into the BS.

Great T shirt!


IM NOT CLUELESS

I WATCH CNN!

 

[Revoltingest]

If you can't come up with a counterargument....

Nothing to argue against.

 

[Stevicus]

Nothing to argue against.

Perhaps you're not willing to even try to understand.

 

[lukethethird]

Great T shirt!


IM NOT CLUELESS

I WATCH CNN!

Yeah, except I don't buy into their BS and repeat like a parrot in an echo chamber what a big threat China is unlike some of the posters on this thread. US warships are the guardians of international waters, that's priceless.

 

[Revoltingest]

Perhaps you're not willing to....

To waste my time dealing with spurious responses?

 

[lukethethird]

To waste my time dealing with spurious responses?

Oh, the irony. I suppose Iraq had weapons of mass destruction too, they just couldn't find them because they were well hidden.

 

[Revoltingest]

Oh, the irony. I suppose Iraq had weapons of mass destruction too, they just couldn't find them because they were well hidden.

Iraq did have them.
The question is when & where.

Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

The U.S. knew Hussein was launching some of the worst chemical attacks in history -- and still gave him a hand.

foreignpolicy.com

United States support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Iran's chemical weapon survivors show twin horrors of WMD and sanctions

Victims of mustard and nerve gas in Iran-Iraq war now struggle to find inhalers, transplant drugs and other vital medicine

www.theguardian.com

As you can see, USA's decrying Iraq
having WMDs is the height of hypocrisy.

 

[Stevicus]

To waste my time dealing with spurious claims?

You just like to dodge, deflect, and gibber. It's easy for anyone to say "spurious claims," but you can't justify such a rancid opinion, you just keep repeating yourself, yet saying absolutely nothing.

So, if you can waste your time doing that, then I can't see that your time is so valuable that you can't take a few moments to respond with something of substance. For example, you can start by supporting your claim that China has plans to invade Taiwan. When will this invasion happen? Do you have dates and times? Do you have their order of battle and know which units they'll be using? You talk to me about "spurious claims," but let's see your evidence for your claims?

 

[Audie]

Yeah, except I don't buy into their BS and repeat like a parrot in an echo chamber what a big threat China is unlike some of the posters on this thread. US warships are the guardians of international waters, that's priceless.

It is priceless. As in invaluable

 

[Revoltingest]

You just like to....

...avoid wasting time with posters playing annoying games.
Unless they're entertaining. A couple actually are.

 

[Father Heathen]

Oh, the irony. I suppose Iraq had weapons of mass destruction too, they just couldn't find them because they were well hidden.

Odd example considering you're a fan of unjustified invasions carried out under false pretences.

 

[Stevicus]

...avoid wasting time with posters playing annoying games.
Unless they're entertaining. A couple actually are.

I'm afraid you have that reversed. At least I'm posting my own honest thoughts, while you're just parroting the warmongers' doctrine. That means that you're playing games, not me. I'm being honest.

 

[lukethethird]

Iraq did have them.
The question is when & where.

Iraq and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran

The U.S. knew Hussein was launching some of the worst chemical attacks in history -- and still gave him a hand.

foreignpolicy.com

United States support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Iran's chemical weapon survivors show twin horrors of WMD and sanctions

Victims of mustard and nerve gas in Iran-Iraq war now struggle to find inhalers, transplant drugs and other vital medicine

www.theguardian.com

As you can see, USA's decrying Iraq
having WMDs is the height of hypocrisy.

But US warships aren't in the China Seas to provoke China, they're there to protect freedom and democracy.