Greetings, AV1611, in the Name of the Lord Christ Jesus! (Hey, the intro. in my new NASB says that the 1611 KJV was a remake/update (I forgot their exact word) of some c.1586 "Bishop's Bible." 'Sup w. dat?)
AV1611 said:
Hi, Brother Jim, nice to meet you.
Well, time will tell; we'll see {-_-}
That's a good point you make.
Wellll, ehhhh, ummmmm, thanks, but I claim it from Above and myself just takin' dictation (I never expect anyone to believe that, however, for we all know of one or more of those, wellll, ummmm, ehhhhh, "mistaken" ones).
Romans 2:14 = FOR WHEN THE GENTILES, WHICH HAVE NOT THE LAW, DO BY NATURE THE THINGS CONTAINED IN THE LAW, THESE, HAVING NOT THE LAW, ARE A LAW UNTO THEMSELVES.
The above is one of the most misunderstood and therefore misused verses.
Kindly allow me liberty to amplify so as to reveal the true implication/intended meaning:
"For when the Gentile [born-again Christians], which have not the [Old Covenant] Law, do by [their reborn] nature the things contained in the Law, these, having not the [Old Covenant] Law, are a [New Covenant] Law unto themselves."
Regardless, your point was taken and with basis.
Matthew 7:20 = WHEREFORE BY THEIR FRUITS YE SHALL KNOW THEM.
I'm tempted to spell out that sound someone hears at an ice hockey game when a goal is scored, but I don't know how to spell it, and such would be somewhat cruel and insensitive---and I'm so very girly for a guy, thank you Jesus. Besides, few are willing to communicate with me, and I'm always---well, most of the time {-_-}---grateful when someone does. So thanks.
The above verse I quote of you quoting, is, again, widely misunderstood and therefore misused.
It does not refer to Fruits of the Spirit, but regards those that someone proselytizes. (You know, like when we idiomatically say of someone's child, "the 'nut' didn't fall very far from the 'tree.'")
The Fruits of the Spirit---given both in a "measure" of each the nine at the time of the New Birth, and then subsequently, also instantaneously, individually available in all their supernatural fullness (
www.EnterHisRest.org)---are not detectable in the natural realm. After all, consider how many thought that Jesus---who of course had all nine Fruits in all their fullness---was a devil. They could not discern either His Love, Meekness, or Goddness (and a whip of a cat-o-nine-tales was not very indicative of Gentleness---looks truly are deceiving).
We can better understand this if we consider the verse, "Is your eye evil because I am Good?" We as sinful flesh, mostly still full of "envy and strife" (KJV), refuse to admit the existence in another, of that which we ourselves have failed to obtain from God.
(One exception would be, those one-in-a-million Mother Theresa's and such, who we tend to idolize and consider a rare exception, refusing to admit that God has called EVERY Christian to the same degree of like-servanthood.)
So, no, I'm truly sorrowed to say, but your response does not answer the "dilemma." I really do appreciate the attempt, though.
"Peace and Grace be multiplied onto you," AV1611, those glorious "manifold Graces of God," in Jesus' precious and exalted-above-all Name, brother jim
[email protected]