and 19 years after that, I feel ancient!I became a Christian when I was 17, and that was 31 years ago. Now I feel old. Lol.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
and 19 years after that, I feel ancient!I became a Christian when I was 17, and that was 31 years ago. Now I feel old. Lol.
So are you in favor of the state forcing women to carry a pregnancy to term against their will?I did say federal government, all citizens and government are to uphold the Constitution, this includes protecting innocent children in the womb. Violence against women who don’t want to carry to term??? No way man, the dude is to take full responsibility to provide for both.
People have to take responsibility for their decisions and when a pregnancy occurs as a result it’s wrong to just kill the child.
Seen as Trump is pro life and Democrats have no problem just killing the child is one of the reasons I voted for him.
Another dodge.Another side step.
Behold: a babyAre you saying that babies have no intrinsic freedom?
and 19 years after that, I feel ancient!
It’s not a problem, would just start a different thread or why not a one on one conversation between you 2. Not sure the point in this thread.
Didn’t mean for you to feel singled out and go ahead and talk away, the original OP gets lost and might as well start a new one in my opinion.It’s not as if metis and I are the only two people in this thread who are engaging in a discussion that isn’t exactly on topic with the OP. It’s not fair to single out me and metis, and complain about us while not acknowledging the other side discussions going on in this thread, too.
No, I’m in favor of the healthy communities that help people so they don’t have to make those decisions in the first place. People helping and supporting their neighbors. Building strong families and communities and this is done best by local communities.So are you in favor of the state forcing women to carry a pregnancy to term against their will?
Didn’t mean for you to feel singled out and go ahead and talk away, the original OP gets lost and might as well start a new one in my opinion.
Yes... a baby....Another dodge.
Behold: a baby
Feel free to rejoin this debate when you feel like you can approach it with intellectual honesty.
I hear ya. Netflix had a two-hour documentary on him, and they covered some of the "baggage" he grew up with, plus I've read several articles dealing with his past life, and these were not partisan "hit-jobs". He had sortofa love/hate relationship with his father, and his parents had a lot of trouble with raising him which is probably why he was sent to a boarding school and then a military-style school because the former couldn't even handle him. Some of his classmates also had mixed feelings towards him.
His first wife Ivana said that he kept NAZI reading material on his bedstand and would often read some, and she said that this would relax him. Sour grapes, I dunno, but he certainly has had a strong attraction to "strong leaders", including Putin and even Saddam Hussein.
So are you in favor of the state forcing women to carry a pregnancy to term against their will?
It’s all good, Merry Christmas and the best to you. Hope you prosper and do well this coming year.I’d like to suggest that we drop this now, because it’s not productive, and I don’t want to continue being contentious towards you. I apologize for being harsh in my posts. I shouldn’t have been acting like that, so, I’m sorry.
Yes, I see. So Trump can claim to have "faith" (which nobody asks him to demonstrate, because he probably couldn't remember Jesus's last name), and if he then goes on to grab random women by the kitty-cat (you know what I mean), he remains righteous. He can pardon real crooks, and try to lock up the innocent, but so what, if he has faith, eh?Romans 3
21 But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— 22 the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. 26 It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.
Obviously, one is made righteous by their faith, not by their acts.
Disagree with your last point -- I've known people who can cherry pick just as easily from both testaments. And if they don't get what they want that way, can ignore both totally. (While still claiming total adherence to scripture, of course.)And actually I doubt this exercise will go anywhere. Some people are adept at cherry picking the OT (not the NT) to find snippets to justify almost anything they like.
And you think this will magically make all women want to carry every pregnancy to term?No, I’m in favor of the healthy communities that help people so they don’t have to make those decisions in the first place. People helping and supporting their neighbors. Building strong families and communities and this is done best by local communities.
Yes, I see. So Trump can claim to have "faith" (which nobody asks him to demonstrate, because he probably couldn't remember Jesus's last name), and if he then goes on to grab random women by the kitty-cat (you know what I mean), he remains righteous. He can pardon real crooks, and try to lock up the innocent, but so what, if he has faith, eh?
Totally whacked view of things, in my opinion. But that pretty much describes religion, as I see it.
Yes, I see. So Trump can claim to have "faith" (which nobody asks him to demonstrate, because he probably couldn't remember Jesus's last name), and if he then goes on to grab random women by the kitty-cat (you know what I mean), he remains righteous. He can pardon real crooks, and try to lock up the innocent, but so what, if he has faith, eh?
Totally whacked view of things, in my opinion. But that pretty much describes religion, as I see it.
This kind of thinking you have is weird to me. So speaking up for the innocent children so they aren’t killed is now forcing women to do something? If you’re sincere in this I’m not sure what to make of that.And you think this will magically make all women want to carry every pregnancy to term?
And why would you vote for people who want the state to force women against their will when you yourself do not approve of that? Is forcing women just the lesser of two evils for you?
The state isn't "speaking up", it is actively forcing women to carry pregnancies to term.This kind of thinking you have is weird to me. So speaking up for the innocent children so they aren’t killed is now forcing women to do something? If you’re sincere in this I’m not sure what to make of that.