Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So this isn't very offensive?
No it isn't.
I find the Hebrew/Jewish history fascinating. The New Testament is proof of fulfillment of the prophecies in the Old. However the people of the Old (Jews) largely disbelieve that is so. However " imetmessiah.com " has Jewish testimonies of them coming to Christ. Quite intriguing.
It happened..? It's okay to talk about.
And ok thank you for sharing your disbelief of my statement? What is your view?
Are the folks who seem to avoid "Christian" mostly American? If so, then it might have something to do with the Religious Right has defamed the name over the past 40 years.
I would say yes, but this forum has a serious American tilt anyway, so maybe it's not a very good way to judge.Are the folks who seem to avoid "Christian" mostly American? If so, then it might have something to do with the Religious Right has defamed the name over the past 40 years.
I think it’s an extension of the whole “it’s not a religion; it’s a relationship with Jesus” thing that’s popular with some Protestants.Any reason why 'Christian' is a dirty word to, well, Christians? I've not observed this in any other large faith group. Muslims call themselves Muslims, Jews call themselves Jews, Baha'is call themselves Baha'is.
It didn't happen, because he wasn't a god, in my view.
That the Christian Scriptures are a very bad attempt to fit a man into prophecies, many of which prophecies aren't even messianic and wrongly applied, after he died.
I'm mostly referring to how he could not possibly be the messiah as he failed to fulfil any of the prophecies, and even if he were, the messiah is not described as being the same as G-d. G-d is One.Right. No one actually believes He is God until He changes them. So that's okay. I was raised to believe nothing and thought all religions were false.
I see the scriptures now and understand them. I see connections that aren't fabricated and a history verified. The timeline is a detail that does not really affect the quality of the texts, if you're referring to the fact they were written after He died. Of course they were. They weren't really intended to be in a book together, they were letters to those from our past, written by people who knew Him. And one Dr. Luke who did an extremely good job investigating the story
I would say yes, but this forum has a serious American tilt anyway, so maybe it's not a very good way to judge.
Are the folks who seem to avoid "Christian" mostly American? If so, then it might have something to do with the Religious Right has defamed the name over the past 40 years.
I'm mostly referring to how he could not possibly be the messiah as he failed to fulfil any of the prophecies, and even if he were, the messiah is not described as being the same as G-d. G-d is One.
I am very interested in Sumerian Babylonian and Akkadian myth and their religious narratives, thusly the Old Testament, which contains quite a lot of material and history that relates strongly to ancient Sumer and its descendant civilizations, that so influenced early semitic peoples in the fertile crescent.
So you're saying the Jewish people should still be looking for a king to come rule them?
Are you Jewish?
Yes, and they are.
I am a Noahide.
Yes. It is incidental the the rest of the Nations will see the transformation and want to make themselves a part of it.If a king is to come rule Israel then He is Savior of Jews only?
Yes. It is incidental the the rest of the Nations will see the transformation and want to make themselves a part of it.