Voodoo days are calender days where activities that are not harmful in themselves become harmful because of what day you do them.
Ancient birthday celebrations were linked to the belief that the actual day of the child's birth was significant. So then each year there is a day of attention given to IT. There are still people who want to believe the day they were born has magical power but power is not what the anniversary of their birth signifies even for THEM.
I hear that twisting scriptures is what I do best so I know what what I am talking about. This is twisting: Christ followers will be no part of the world. What world? Custom? Isn't it political intrique that is "the world"? How to link a family/friends celebration of another person's birthday with political intrique? I don't know how to do it. Do you?
How do I know no part of the world does NOT mean customs of the world?
Colossians 2:16 Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.
Romans 14:5 One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind.
Romans 14:3 The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted them.
Ecclesiastes 3:12 I know that there is no good in them, but for a man to rejoice, and to do good in his life.
Ecclesiastes 3:13 And also that every man should eat and drink, and enjoy the good of all his labour, it is the gift of God.
Now what about the sure conviction that the two birthdays in the Bible mean God hates us to remember the day our loved ones were born?
Those two accounts share some similarities.
1. They were national celebrations
2. The celebrations were given for wicked people
3. The wicked people gave the celebration to themselves
4. I can't believe over indulgences weren't present.
5. I can't believe other sins weren't present
6. Because it was the king that held the celebration, attendence must have been mandatory.
Please compare all that to a family having cake and presents on a child's birthday.
The only similarities that I can see is the day always falls on the anniversay of birth and that the person whose birthday it is should be present. I think it would be good that if the birthday person does not want to wish and blow then he should not be obliged to do so. But I really see no harm in it and I can't believe it would be a determining factor in the person's everlasting actualization.