Father Heathen
Veteran Member
If that were true then why would the bible oppose those things?Liberty, rights, equality and democracy are all based on a creator, the Christian creator.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If that were true then why would the bible oppose those things?Liberty, rights, equality and democracy are all based on a creator, the Christian creator.
It's also true that every leader behind running the African slave trade in the Americas, the forcible removal of native tribes from their lands, the enslaving of Chinese immigrants, the refusal to recognize established treaties with the native tribes, the forced democracy established in Latin and South America, the internment of Japanese Americans (or as the Japanese Americans would say, the internment of Americans), etc. were all led by religious men.
The slave trade was well established long beore "religious men" brought slavery to America.
African slave trade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade: From Africa to Europe
Humans always go from one extreme to another. With a religious majority you have discrimination against non-religious expression and vice a versa. I wish we could just be peaceful and balanced. But apparently that isn't in our nature.
The faith *is* under attack, but it is also doing a lot of attacking in its own right.
'Nuff said.
The faith *is* under attack, but it is also doing a lot of attacking in its own right.
'Nuff said.
The context of my remark was in regards to "religious men" in America. My point was, they did not come up with the idea of slavery, it had been going on for centuries in countries that had no knowledge of God or religion. In other words, it was going on before the people that are accused where even born.:biglaugh:
what about the bible...?
The context of my remark was in regards to "religious men" in America. My point was, they did not come up with the idea of slavery, it had been going on for centuries in countries that had no knowledge of God or religion. In other words, it was going on before the people that are accused where even born.
Just how long did you take to read my sources if at all? You moved the goal posts a few centuries.
My comment had nothing to do with the Bible and everything to do with gnomes misreprensentation of slavery in America.guess again. are you suggesting slavery is wrong? why would you?
And that has what to do with my comment?god condoned it in your bible...:yes:
My comment had nothing to do with the Bible and everything to do with gnomes misreprensentation of slavery in America. And that has what to do with my comment?
If you want to quote me, at least take the time to read my sources. I'm talking about apples and all you want to discuss is oranges.
If you want me to have a biblical debate with you, perhaps you could narrow things down from "my bible" to a few verses that might apply to your argument.
It's cool, we just both have to get on the same page at the same time.you know what, you're right. i apologize.
it was acceptable to beat a slave so severely that it only disabled him or her for two days:
exodus 21:20-21, 26-27
slaves in ancient Israel were automatically emancipated after 6 years of slavery, but only if they were Jewish. however, if the slave owner "gave" the slave a wife, the owner could keep the wife and any children as his property.
exodus 21:1-4
exodus 21:7: "And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do."
You can't take him anywhere on misunderstandings or fabrications of history.
It's also true that America was predominantly anti-Christian as well. It all just depended which part of Christianity you belonged to.
There were anti-Catholic laws on the books long after independence in many states. Many Quakers and Amish were run off their land or otherwise punished for following the dictates of their faith by refusing to fight in various wars. It was technically illegal to be a Mormon in Missouri until 1976.
The slave trade was well established long before "religious men" brought slavery to America.
African slave trade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade: From Africa to Europe
It's cool, we just both have to get on the same page at the same time.
Yes, there is some pretty rough stuff in the old testament. Your examples are far from the most extreme. The first 5 books of the Bible are suppose to be written by Moses who was a slave himself at one time. Slavery was commonplace back then and I believe the laws applied to the people of those times.
Yes, many people in more modern times used the old testament to validate the terrible practice of slavery. As a Christian these laws no longer apply in the old testament and we now are under the new covenant. This does not get the Christian off the hook completely however, because slavery still existed in the new testament as well.
Compared to the old testament though, things where much milder.
A religious person could almost justify anything if they where to quote the Bible out of context. People do this even today. That does not make them right however and they are the exception not the norm for today's Christian.
The injustice right now in modern times would be homosexuality. Jesus said for us to love one another and to leave judgement to the Lord. If you want to get the broad brush out, it would be much more accurate to paint the religious homophobes than it would to say modern day Christians embrace slavery.
My point about slavery was, it had gone on for centuries in Africa by non-Christians and was not invented by the Bible thumpers.
Can we blame slavery on the Bible? I hardly think so.
The thing is, there is bad and good in any group of people. Christians are no exception.
The faith *is* under attack
Just like a brick wall "attacks" someone who runs into it.
Just like a brick wall "attacks" someone who runs into it.
How do you think "the faith" is under attack, and who do you think is attacking it?No, more like someone with a jackhammer attacks the brick wall.
How do you think "the faith" is under attack, and who do you think is attacking it?
BTW - when you say "the faith", what do you mean? Religion in general? Christianity? Some segment of Christianity? Your personal beliefs? Something else?
How do you think "the faith" is under attack, and who do you think is attacking it?
BTW - when you say "the faith", what do you mean? Religion in general? Christianity? Some segment of Christianity? Your personal beliefs? Something else?