1. What is your concept of God or a god? To us Christians, the idea of God has to be the entity behind the creation of the universe, who set up rules or laws to guide his creation examples are moral absolutes (objective morality)
I think that there is a big difference between God and gods, although both are religious concepts.
When we say God, we are referring to one singular entity that created the universe, meaning that he/she/it exists outside the universe, either in part or in entirety.
When we talk about the gods of paganism, we are not talking about anything outside of nature. There are things that have the power to effect our lives, and some of those things have a LOT of power, like storms, or war, or tyrants. The idea of paganism (at least in its original form) is to placate these powers so that they don't hurt you.
FWIW I do believe in God.
2. is the universe eternal? the answer is no. It is not, according to science, the universe has a cause, and if that's true then it was created and the question is by who and that's where science is stuck. Religion answers the question but you wouldn't accept the fact.
We know that the universe had a beginning, what we call the Big Bang. Since time came into existence then, some would say speaking of "before" is a bit like discussing what is south of the South Pole. However, that said, we do not know what caused the Big Bang, or whether the universe existed in some other form prior, or whether other universes also exist.
The best predictions we have of what will happen to the universe is that it will continue to exist, but not in the form we know it today. There is not enough mass to create the kind of gravity necessary to stop the expansion or have it collapse once more into a singularly. In fact, the expansion is accelerating, although we are not sure why. At any rate, eventually all the stars will burn out, leaving the universe cold, dark, and lifeless.
See, religion made claims of a Creator and the universe his/her/ creation, but people wanted to disprove that fact by turning to science.
Disproving God has NEVER been the objective of science. Since God is not part of nature, meaning that he can't be measured, he is beyond the purview of science. This is why science can neither prove nor disprove God.
After a long time of winding, twisting, and turning came back to the simple fact that it is created
Huh? Science has not proven that the universe was created. It is one of many possibilities as to why the universe exists. For example, one hypothesis is to say that the universe has always existed, albeit not in the same form we have today. And believe it or not, there is nothing unscientific in saying, "We don't know."
and now sparks another argument that denies the entity provided by religion yet has not offered a fitting alternative.
I'm not sure what you are referring to. Logic, like science, can neither prove nor disprove God.
As limited science as a tool has been proven to be,
Limited???? Science has done more to reduce suffering than all the religion in the history of humanity. It has given us modern medicine, with its antibiotics, vaccines, and needed surgeries. And it has given us tech, with its great capacity to reduce labor. Most people no longer feed themselves due to the sweat on their brow. Do you really want to go back to a world without washer machines?
people still want to base their argument on that. If a story is hard to believe, that doesn't rule out the possibility of it being true.
Science and logic (meaning arguments without fallacies) are the two greatest tools we have for determining the truth about the natural world. While I think religion is a very good thing that increases our wellbeing, it has not shown itself to be very accurate or helpful in the sorts of things that science is. Do you really want to go back to the time when Israelites believed in a flat earth, with sheol underneath, and a sphere of water surrounding it?