Laniakea
Not of this world
As I said, I don't care if you don't like the source. Either Biden was being truthful, or he was lying about those things. Since what he claimed was proven to be untrue, then it wasn't the truth.
That's your Biden.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Christians what do you think about Trump's convictions
- Thread starter We Never Know
- Start date
That's your Biden.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
If you were truly concerned about lying you would strongly resent Trump, such as in the last debate laying over 30 times according to PolitiFact, which is an independent source.
How any Christian or observant Jew can support Trump is beyond me, but then I don't know if you have any religious affiliation.
I'm not asking btw.
Laniakea
Not of this world
Politifact is a Leftist source.
PolitiFact Media Bias Rating
Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of PolitiFact. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.
www.allsides.com
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Politifact is a Leftist source.
PolitiFact Media Bias Rating
Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of PolitiFact. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.
Notice "lean left", so I guess PolitiFact believes that being honest of leaning left. Also, how do you supposedly know that "AllSides" is not biased?Politifact is a Leftist source.
PolitiFact Media Bias Rating
Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of PolitiFact. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.
If you could catch many of Trump's lies during the debate, then you're a lost cause. Of course, this is why I have you on my ignore list but still felt compelled to comment on your repeated falsehoods.
Anyhow, post back what you want as I slip back into my cave.
Are you saying Biden didn't really lie about the laptop?
Biden lied in debate with Trump, which interfered elections as much as Trumps alleged lies.
"Biden lied about Hunter laptop at last debate with Trump..."
Biden lied about Hunter laptop at last debate with Trump, ‘Spies Who Lie’ tell Congress
“When he said that it is a Russian plan or whatever — garbage — that’s not what we said in there,” said former CIA Director John Brennan of the 46th president.
nypost.com
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Regardless of what sensational press calls it, he's convicted for falsifying business records.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
You, or anyone else, is free to build a case and bring it in front of a judge and jury and demonstrate that that is the case.
Until then....
McBell
Unbound
You do know that using your presented logic, Trump would be in much deeper water than Biden simply because Trump told so many more lies in that debate, right?Biden lied in debate with Trump, which interfered elections as much as Trumps alleged lies.
"Biden lied about Hunter laptop at last debate with Trump..."
Biden lied about Hunter laptop at last debate with Trump, ‘Spies Who Lie’ tell Congress
“When he said that it is a Russian plan or whatever — garbage — that’s not what we said in there,” said former CIA Director John Brennan of the 46th president.
what is the real issue here?
That Trump was taken to task for one of his thousands of lies and Biden was not?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Again, you stoop low and use a Murdoch source that is notoriously right-wing. And what you're also doing is being unethical by using "guilt by association". Hunter is not Joe and Joe is not Hunter, and this shouldn't be even slightly difficult to understand.Biden lied in debate with Trump, which interfered elections as much as Trumps alleged lies.
"Biden lied about Hunter laptop at last debate with Trump..."
Biden lied about Hunter laptop at last debate with Trump, ‘Spies Who Lie’ tell Congress
“When he said that it is a Russian plan or whatever — garbage — that’s not what we said in there,” said former CIA Director John Brennan of the 46th president.
Here's a nonpartisan source on this: Hunter Biden laptop controversy - Wikipedia
Last edited:
Muffled
Jesus in me
I don't want my enemies judging whether I broke the law. Usually that leads to a kangaroo court like the trial of Jesus.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
In Trump's case, it definitely wasn't a kangaroo court by any stretch of the imagination.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
BTW your non partisan source was last edited by......
MisterWat3rm310n.
At the time of this posting.
Laniakea
Not of this world
How does that compare in your mind to allowing 10,000,000 illegals into this country--many who have committed murders of young children?Regardless of what sensational press calls it, he's convicted for falsifying business records.
McBell
Unbound
And?
Unless you are making the claim that the edit is false information or otherwise wrong, so what?
If you are claiming the information is wrong, show it.
with better sources.
McBell
Unbound
Does not compare at all.
It isn't even apples to oranges.
I mean, at least those are both fruits...
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Always a charm to identify ones editor(s). Assuming such 'people' actually exist.
It's going to be a hobby of mine moving forward as a public service as I post wiki myself time to time.
Maybe someday, I'll see an edit from xXBatmanXx then I'll know it's the real deal.
My announcements of said editors will of course be presented in the spirit of perfect neutrality. ;0)
wellwisher
Well-Known Member
Based on the DNC and Swamp's behavior during the Russian Collusion Coup, where the Swamp and DNC found/made Trump guilty until he was proven innocent, it is probably better to wait to pass judgement. This appears to be another swamp/DNC get Trump scam, which did not happen until after Trump declared his 2024 candidacy. There was no mention or buzz until then. MY guess is if Trump dropped out none of this would have happened. I would prefer wait until the Appeals Court takes a look. If we had taken the word of the same dirt bags during Russian Collusion scam, an innocent man would still be locked up. H
The corporate fraud trial in NYC was a legal scam, because it had no victims who testified about being damaged based on the accusations of the Prosecution. None of the Banks complained about being ripped off. The DNC cannot just make up a victimless crime. It is not so much me wanting to run interference for Trump, but more like not trusting the DNC, after they demonstrating their disregard for Justice. They have been trying every dirty trick, since Trump won in 2016. If this was real why didn't they do these trials in 2017? Why the collusion scam, first? The fact is they did try the Stormy Daniels scam in 2016, but it got no traction, since it was not done in NYC where you can lie.
If you look current affairs, the DNC collectively lied about the mental fitness of Biden, from his holdup during COVID, up until the debate, when they were finally caught and were no longer able cover up with more lies. Now with egg on their face, they are having to look surprised and pretend outrage, so they scam their way out of their original scam. This group cannot be trusted.
As far as Stormy Daniels, Biden had his accusor Tara Reade. Tara was not a Porn Star who makes money doing sex. As far as I know Stormy got paid. It was business and Trump was more than generous; $130,000. That amount seems more like extortion, since Stormy may be good but not that good.
The DNC scam about Stormy, was not about prostitution, or extortion and privacy agreement, but about saying this business transaction came from campaign donations. That seemed like a stretch. If you recall, candidate Trump originally did not take any donations, to not be under the thumb of donors. He used his own money. This DNC scam is about making up a charge, that would make more sense for career politicians, who like to live large off their campaign donations, like Hilary and her penthouse suite in NY. Trump has his own money and hotels and did not even take salary as President. Why risk that for chicken feed? The premise is flawed and will die on appeal.
Tara Reade was once on then Senator Biden's staff. She was always a loyal Democrat and Aid. When she brought up the charges, she was harassed by the Biden's DOJ and FBI. Biden could have given her a privacy agreement to shut her up. Instead the FBI had a code name for their assignment. Ms Reade, then sued the DOJ for $millions for their effort to make her life miserable; witness tampering. She even had to escape the country and found sanctuary in Russia, where she would not be deported. Biden may see her again after he leaves office. Instead of pass judgment. I will wait until the appeal process is over.
McBell
Unbound
Why so much concern on who made the edit and so little concern on the accuracy of the edit?
If the edit is correct, why does it matter who made it?
Laniakea
Not of this world
Then you agree with my implied point that Biden's policy of allowing illegals to flood this country is far worse than a falsified business record entry.
But I'm sure your priorities are different.