"Hello there. I already have made up my mind that I disagree with you, but despite my own equally faith-based belief, I will set up an easily assailable component of yours (again, I in no way with to further debate or make a legitimate attempt at helping you break out of what I consider to be detrimental to your life, but instead wish to cap your suffering with a pretty little insult cherry on top). You will notice my assumption of something I already consider to be fallacious; I have done this because you will defend your religion, whereas I only have the confidence to attack. Don''t bother asking to me to put forward any sort of scientific position - I have achieved such a standard level of intelligence that I have realized that I can ignore almost all of life by never having the courage to really think about anything."
There is nothing wrong with venting frustration or ranting, but the empirical agnostic community (agnostic is what you call a lack of belief in god without a disbelief in any god) has allowed itself to descend to the crust of the conceptual planet - zealots have convinced otherwise intelligent people that the various dogmatic rites of a religion can be proved, disproved, or even convincingly supported or debunked.
You're too smart for these continued swats. Yes, you're right, but it's obvious and there are more interesting things to discuss and more important goals for people like us - doing things that actually start loosening the grip the ideological Absolutists on our society, for example.