This does not make them an entirely separate law.Your argument falls down here as it does not address the fact that God also wrote the 10 Commandments on two tables of stone and nothing more was added to them.
So you're more concerned with what was written on physical stone than what G-d commanded and continued to command? Is it that you expect @Tumah and I to etch our arguments against you on stone tablets; would they carry more meaning to you that way? I also guess the Oral Law has no meaning to you whatsoever because it wasn't written until the common era.God spoke and wrote 10 commandments and nothing more was added to them it was the work of God alone and God's LAW.
You realise that the Torah is not written in a book, yes? It's written on a scroll and it includes the ten commandments you keep talking about. Because they're part of the same Torah. I'm surprised and a bit disturbed that you seem to think laws against kidnap, rape, mistreating animals and sodomy are only 'supporting' and not really relevent in themselves.The book of the law was only to support God's LAW (10 commandments) that is the standard of righteousness if obeyed and the knowledge of sin if broken.
There is no book.. God's LAW (10 commandments) according to God's Word is different and separate to the Mosaic book of the law. Both come from God given to man but only the 10 commandments were made, written and spoken by God alone and given to God's people.
They were spoken by G-d to Moshe, who spoke to the Israelites because they were unable to hear the vice of G-d and live. G-d is still giving commandments, but He can't give them to a group of dead people so he used Moshe as a mouthpiece as the Israelites asked him.
Yes, I agree; I disagree that this makes them any more relevent than any of the others.Your trying to side step the point being made. Do you agree that God only made 10 commandments on two tables of stone? No one is disagreeing that God through Moses made other laws that support God's Law. God's LAW and the Mosaic book of the law according to God's command was to be separated for a reason do you not know what that reason is?
Moshe made no laws. They were spoken to him from G-d.
I don't care what your Christian scriptures say.No I do not agree but you will not understand as you missed the coming of the Messiah. These are shadow laws that have their fulfillment in the new covenant. They are not irrelavent but have their fulfillment in the new covenant scriptures. For example in circumcision in the new covenant Romans 2:28-29, [28] For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:[29], But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God. This is in fulfillment of Jeremiah 31:31-34; Ezekiel 36:24-27.
I'm not ignoring anything.No he simply disagreed with it without proving why. Kind of what your doing right now. Ignoring God's Word does not make it dissappear.