They benefit from overpopulation because they need more and more slaves to exploit.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Convince me that the world isn't overpopulated
- Thread starter Estro Felino
- Start date
Google says
While scientists knew there were some polar bears, roughly a few hundred, in the Southeast Greenland area from historical records and Indigenous knowledge, they never expected to find a new subpopulation living there—and, they say, they didn't know how special they were
At first, Happy Days was funny, at least until they jumped the shark. I think it was inspired by the success of the film American Graffiti which was kind of nostalgia trip for the Boomers who were approaching their thirties. By the mid to late 1970s, people had enough of the sadness, corruption, and seriousness of the recent years and seemed to be looking for more nostalgia, escapism, and fun. People flocked to Star Wars, Grease, Saturday Night Fever, not the gloom and doom like Soylent Green. By the 1980s, as globalization was happening around them, the mantra was "Don't Worry Be Happy."
Yeah, the Amish might survive, depending on if they can avoid the chaos and roving bands of chickens they're bound to encounter in the event of a total collapse.
I don't think it can, but that won't stop people from trying.
Although it is clear that the world is overpopulated by humans, for humans there is no real way to reduce the population fairly or without major problems for the humans left. The word itself will eventually fix the problem and it will be fair and the humans left will struggle. For the world 100,000 years or a million years is relatively a small amount of time. It is great to thing about fixing things but even if we do or don't eventually humans will no longer exist yet the world will remain.
Who said they were disconnected?
Wu Wei
ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
You can't judge by few polars, likely they still think their in Alaska... and that says there was a population, not that there is a population....Bear sightings, all Polar I believe, are rare there. But volcano and glacier sightings are quite common
Last edited:
It is the Isle of Wight, not "White". Wight is old English for man.
It is correct that some aquifers are being used unwisely. That is unfortunate, to say the least. Especially since there are alternatives such as desalination. Some of the reasons for this misuse include incorrect perception of the actual costs and inertia of practice. These misuses will self-correct with time. However it would be better if people were educated about the issues so that needless damage is not done. But it isn't a problem in the sense that ready solutions are available. Similarly topsoil depletion also has solutions.
I heard some people were putting these black plates onto their roofs and getting electricity from those. There are also giant pinwheels popping up in windy places....
Strange.
Good point. Another decade of climate change and it really would be green.
Do they work at night time or when there isn't any wind? Asking for a friend.
And the worst kind, too -- white ones.
What's to address? Its true. It's been common knowledge for decades. Here in the US wells have been going dry, and once easily irrigated farmland on the Great Plains is becoming both infertile and difficult/expensive to irrigate.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Your idol Elon doesn't seem to think so:
Elon Musk tweets on "population collapse" after China's birth rate plummets
The Twitter CEO previously claimed that declining birth rates are more of a threat to humanity than climate change.
www.newsweek.com
He's an imbecile, however.
Anyway, looking at the map, it's both interesting and sad how the places with the highest birthrates are also places that struggle with famine.
Home panels charge batteries charge during the day for nighttime power.
When the wind isn't blowing in one place it's blowing in another. They're all on the same grid, plus energy can be stored in heat sinks, elevated reservoirs, &c for high demand periods.
Not on cloudy days or in many places for much of winter. And winter is when the power is needed most.
And in many places the wind doesn't blow enough to ever make them practical.
People have been talking about these for decades and they still have very limited implementation. It might be because they are economically not viable. On the other hand nuclear power doesn't have these limitations.
For instance, Elon says that the West isn't overpopulated and people there should be the ones making kids.Your idol Elon doesn't seem to think so:
Elon Musk tweets on "population collapse" after China's birth rate plummets
The Twitter CEO previously claimed that declining birth rates are more of a threat to humanity than climate change.
He's an imbecile, however.
We Never Know
No Slack
Would 8.5 million people(2021) living on 302.6 square miles of land be over crowding/over populated?
That's 28.1 thousand per square mile.
Welcome to New York City.
It's not a matter of space.
The spaces are borderless.
Think of Alaska.
Or Russia.
It's a matter of resources.