Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
...a joke.
A few do the worst things.
But their target audience have no rules, morals or care for human life.
You still don't get it.
Where? I've been around the sun a few dozen times and I've never needed the popo. Yes, is crime and such, but America is not on the brink of anarchy and chaos with the police being the difference between that and order.
I've been attacked before. I wasn't really scared until the police show up, because they can do things that rural, small town hoodlums can't. And they showed up several minuyltes after my friends and I fought off the attack and were heading to a friend's house. We were high on victory, and then the pigs show up and a couple of my friends wound up on the ground and searched (they had a record).
I don't. In my personal life the police have been nothing more than a burden, stressor, and gnarly pain in the ***, like that time I was pulled over for my legal underbody lights.
Doing some researc earlier I found this article. The course the author took is a major name in police training, is heavily cited 8n the training manual I have, and what the author of the article observed matches what's in my training manual. Amd the way it teaches police to fear people amd domimate a situation be willing to resort to violence amd kill is extremely problematic and impeding necessary reform.
Very often, the cops are the monsters.
I forgot to link to the article.
What is systemic is the misconduct on either side.
If defending the free is wrong, then leave. Go to where you believe that you can be free and leave the system of 'we the people'. I am aware that 'invisible hand' is a rude model as business has no use of virtues. But the system of justice requires police to fight and contain the violent and ignorant from taking over and making lawlessness the rule of the land.
Fire all police that break the law as they are as bad as preachers of faith taking advantage of children, just monsters.
Absolutely but when fighting monsters it often takes training of people to be just as ruthless. I will trust the police over street gangs and the mobs that will destroy a city for the errors of a few.
Always!
Were any of my questions a NO?
OK..... I've seen what a robber can do to a home and people. To the extent that the father wanted to shoot anyone with a blue rag.
The police have learned that in gang violence neither side is innocent. I've witnessed gang violence myself and watched people on both sides get stabbed, shot and have their heads bached in. It's usually when one is surrounded and the mob style assaults turn ugly.
Is that the excuse, an autistic diagnosis. Did you ever consider that the people that surround you, are teaching you to rebel. I was raised that running from the police was a suicide especially if you committed a crime.
No big deal. The stress was losing your freedom and then realizing you lose your right to just talk yourself out of the situation.
And drunks frighten police officers, especially the ones that drive as they are usually the first to an accident where a family and children are torn apart from a drunk driver incident and they have to pull the pieces out.
So? I've still been attacked and the police was the absolute last thing I wanted to see.
No guns, no knives, just a group of hoodlums in small town, rural Indiana who jumped us.
No excuse, it's just a fact. The cops have a well established history of mistreating and killing those with mental illnesses at a very high rate, and I've had problems with the cops due to it.
The stress was because I shouldn't have been in there.
Yeah. Except I didn't sound or smell drunk. I sounded autistic.
Nice way to throw out assumptions. No to all. I was actually working at the moment.
Bull****.
No.
They're legal, so no. The cops really just need to learn the laws themselves if they're expected to enforce and uphold them.
Great way to throw out more erroneous assumptions.
The message I teach is never, never, never EVER trust the police and absolutely do not tell them anything more than is legally requires, and to stand up for their rights.
If parent trained their children, there wouldn't be (so many) bad cops.
Did I strike a nerve?
#3 wasn't exactly a "yes" but we agree more than we disagree. Then why the opposition? We all want the same, a professional, well trained, reliable and responsible police force.
so hoodlums did the nasty, the police were there to level the playing field.
The media and legal teams suggest the mistreating. The police cannot be experienced in all events, even if trained to try.
Perfect. Self imposed responsibility. Thank you!
Many descriptions of the term.
Worked?
So no observance of their experience but yours is most important?
Sorry, they see criteria just as you hate the badge
Not an assumption, just rational
That is the rude approach. Trust them over your own ideals. They are far better to observe as credible.
Screw the legal angle as they impose lawyer ideals of how to circumvent personal responsibility. That't what lawyers do for a living. the police try to enable a equal footing for all of us based on basic common sense, not legal rubbish to get a criminal off.
Agreed
Sure , people that do not like US and the security of our police enforcement should leave.
OK, the intercity cops see far more carnage than most.
Sure, not one wants to be a suspect.
Who is oppressing who?
No, they don't. They don't create nor enable law. They are to enforce it.
I already told you we fought them off long before the cops showed up. We beat them up and they ran away before the cops were even called.
I am neither the media nor a legal team.
They need to be trained in dealing with those who have mental illnesses and how to identify signs of potential mental illness. That doesn't mean they need to be trained psychologists, but it does mean police departments need more social workers.
No, I said I was working, as in out doing activities for a monetary income.
I live and work in those places they call warzones. They aren't seeing what goes on in one.
That's not something you can really see unless I did something like putting a sticker on my car that says **** the police. But even if I did that's free speech and they are obligated to respect that.
It is an assumption because I told you I was working. That isn't looking cool in front of friends.
When they stop trying to cover up for ones like former cop Bissard (Indianapolis pig who was drunk on the job, driving amd killed a motorist) I'll reconsider my position. When internal investigations are outlawed I'll reconsider. When qualified immunity ends I'll reconsider. But until then, especially as long as they can lie to us, they are fundamentally untrustable.
Nope. I didn't belong in a cruiser and didn't do anything to deserve it.
What term and meaning? Drunk? Autistic? None of what you said there makes any sense.
I get the strong impression that you favor
After all the reports that @Revoltingest has posted, after becoming aware of their training, after knowing about qualified immunity and being against all that you still believe we want to "Hold[ing] back our police from doing there job"?
Lots of reports from lots of perspectives. Huge country, many police departments.
Lousy assumption.
It's not an assumption.
I made no claim.
It seems that your strident (& rude)
That shows bad judgement.
The police are the victims of your abuse and assumptions.