That post was not written to you.....
Insulting your intelligence..... because I made a proposal..... ?
I'll see you around.
Well, lets reverse it?
Gosh you silly *** atheists! Grass is green OBVIOUSLY ... gall!!!! And therefore God is real too because the evidence for God is the same as grass you see!!! Gall!!!!
Is that in any way valid?
Do you know accept that God is real?
Is that an accurate assessment of the argumentation in support of atheism?
Is that an accurate assessment of the argumentation for God?
How do you find it when someone honestly expects you to think that a stupid comparison of God to grass being green would actually drive you to become a Christian? Do you feel respected? Or do you feel like someone would be totally disrespecting you? Insulting you rather than reasoning with you?
We are literally just making things up and demanding that this made up BS be afforded the same respect as actual academia correct? Its basely illogical.
The assumption that Christians, or any other religion, is too stupid to see base illogic is ... sad.
As I have pointed out, repeatedly, this is why atheists HAVE TO SUPPORT THEIR CLAIMS rather than just make a claim. To NOT do so is irrational.
There is no evidence or support for the truth of your proposal. None.
There is strong and compelling evidence of Jesus that has produced UNANIMOUS period scholar acceptance of historical Jesus.
To even make the claim that yours is true is, once again, a flagrant guilt by association fallacy. Nakedly and obviously so.
Had you bothered to pursue even the most basic of academic principles and supported EITHER claim, you would never have foisted the proposal, which was annihilated on contact wasn't it?
That you actually expect it to be treated as a serious point? Laughable.
In fact, its smacks of rank degradation. That you actually EXPECT someone to not see an overtly and obvious fallacy and treat it like scientific theory instead. How stupid do you think someone is simply because they have a different faith choice than you? What possible could cause you to so dehumanize billions of people that you would expect them to NOT see or even be swayed by an overt and obvious fallacy?
And to be presented with an idea that begins with a premise that requires us to be dumber than a house plant to even pretend that the 'proposal' has merit?
Who are you fooling?
And why do you think its best to assume on a faith choice that people have no brains? Shouldn't merit be the determiner of intellect and not simply a faith choice?
But then, that would require us to SUPPORT a claim and have already made an assessment based on the merits of the support.
Better by far to think that people, based solely on a faith choice, cannot recognize a ****** argument when they see one. One so obviously flawed that its insulting to even have to rebut it.
Merit, support, should have prevented such a weak and denigrating argument from ever having been made.
Seriously? This crap I just made up and am not supporting is a better explanation than Jesus? All the Ph.D and thousands of volumes of scholarship and collections of evidence, archeology, can be ignored because I just made something up?
Again, how stupid do you think we are?
And treating people to proposals that are so severely lacking in merit makes atheism look good how?
