godnotgod
Thou art That
I think we need to be cautious about anthropomorphising on questions like this.
That's not what anthropomorhism is.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think we need to be cautious about anthropomorphising on questions like this.
Tat tvam asi
There is a difference.....gravity is a force between bodies with mass...dark energy has mass and occupies the space within you..
No I am not...regardless of evidence of universal expansion..gravity is an attractive force between bodies of mass....and dark energy comprises 65% mass of the universe..I think you're confusing dark energy with dark matter. Dark energy is more like a repulsive force.
http://www.space.com/6619-dark-energy.html
No I am not...regardless of evidence of universal expansion..gravity is an attractive force between bodies of mass....and dark energy comprises 65% mass of the universe..
"Again on a mass–energy equivalence basis, the density of dark energy (~ 7 × 10−30 g/cm3) is very low, much less than the density of ordinary matter or dark matter within galaxies. However, it comes to dominate the mass–energy of the universe because it is uniform across space."... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
Light has mass...have you not heard of gravitational lensing in astronomical science..light is energy!!! Mass-energy means the mass of the energy...Yes, you are. Note the significance of the first phrase above that I have bolded, "Again on a mass–energy equivalence basis..."
And why do you think it's called dark energy?
Light has mass...have you not heard of gravitational lensing in astronomical science..light is energy!!! Mass-energy means the mass of the energy...
Who mentioned the mass of dark matter or ordinary matter... I spoke of dark energy mass...65% of the total....I think you need to study this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass–energy_equivalence
In any case dark energy is envisaged as an expansive or repulsive force, and is distinct from dark matter and ordinary matter.
Who mentioned the mass of dark matter or ordinary matter... I spoke of dark energy mass...65% of the total....
I did not miss it...did you miss my point on gravitational lensing wrt light?You're still missing the point, which is equivalence.
If the soul exists and is a form of energy, it's effected by gravity. Which would kind of suck. I'm picturing every disembodied soul falling towards the center of Earth upon it's body's death.
In early Buddhism, nothingness is indeed a dimension, experienced when one enters the seventh (arupa) jhana. It is said to exist on a dimension higher than consciousness itself (the sixth arupa jhana)..
So do you think you are the Andromeda galaxy? I assume you recognise that you are not the Andromeda galaxy, just comprised of the same kind of forces and elements. And dare I say it, the same kind of interactions.
Anything with mass is subject to gravitational force....yes...
Light has mass...have you not heard of gravitational lensing in astronomical science..light is energy!!! Mass-energy means the mass of the energy...
Light doesn't have mass in the classical sense. Nothing with mass can travel the speed of light. Light has (or rather, is) energy. That's why it's effected by gravity.
Not exactly Andromeda . Light does have mass, but that mass is only present in our reality (the reality that can be measured) half of the time. The other half of the time that mass is somewhere else.
Hi Mysitic....only 2.5% of the universe is detectable matter....and matter is comprised of the atomic elements... So universal bodies when they die explosively, be it galaxies, stars, etc., mainly revert to the energy state before once again reforming under gravitational forces. This is an eternal state of affairs, but nothing ever actually disappears absolutely...for example you talk of matter and anti-matter...when any particle mates with its anti-particle, say an electron and positron...there is annihilation according to E = MC^2, but the resultant energy in the form of a gamma ray will, when it comes in contact with matter, revert back to the the electron and positron.. Nothing can ever be taken from the universe, nor can anything ever be added to it...Ok ben d, will you help me with something because you know about this stuff? Everything in Creation blinks on and then off (it goes somewhere else part of the time). When things blink off, what is left here or is it just empty? And because everything in Creation has a wave frequency and an anti wave frequency, can dark energy be cancelled with it's anti wave frequency? If so what effect would that have on faster than light travel? And what effect would that have on the "zpe" forces that are in play normally and their affect on the creating of ineria? There seems to be some evidence that there are some folks from somewhere else that have huge vehicles that move without enertia and they blink out of one place and then blink in at another place . How could this be done? And could this phenomenon be related to the OP question?
Yes..... How would the mass energy stuff work out in a FTL (faster than light) spacecraft system as proposed in the paper linked to above?Light doesn't have mass in the classical sense. Nothing with mass can travel the speed of light. Light has (or rather, is) energy. That's why it's effected by gravity.