YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
Naw. My compassion won't let me. I have to try and get through to you....So stop listening! DUH!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Naw. My compassion won't let me. I have to try and get through to you....So stop listening! DUH!
Naw. My compassion won't let me. I have to try and get through to you....
But that is the beauty of the scientific apple cart, my friend. You can indeed tip it over, but the damn thing will just correct itself and keep moving...So stop listening! DUH!
(then, again, does the Universe 'make sense'? Quantum Physics seems to have upset more than one applecart.)
It's not about salvation, silly. LOL...I don't need salvation from a Fake Bodhisattva.
mmmm.....no....it's actually Nothing:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16095-its-confirmed-matter-is-merely-vacuum-fluctuations/
Talk about much ado about nothing, eh?
Hmm interesting. So, if I'm getting it, it's just two things coming together? But wouldn't that still be something?
And I saw something about the vacuum fluctuations is popping in and out of existence? So wouldn't that mean it'd still exist even if for that tiny small period of time it's there? :\
That's what I thought.
Spirituality tells us not one thing of nature and reality.
It is only a reflection of ones conscious mind, and factually nothing more.
Godnotgod, are you just making things up as you go out of desperation?
You did not back up your own statement on how YOU claimed spirituality describes nature. What does it describe to you?
But that is the beauty of the scientific apple cart, my friend. You can indeed tip it over, but the damn thing will just correct itself and keep moving...
Thank you for having a receptive mind.
As I read it, all of the mass of the atom is created by these Quantum and Higgs Fields fluctuations. The mass so 'created' is virtual in nature, rendering what we know as material reality to be virtual, since the gross world is built completely upon the sub-atomic world, created and re-created from moment to moment. What it amounts to from a spiritual POV is that the reality we think is real and material, is actually a manifestation of consciousness at the base level. IOW, material reality is an illusion, but not your ordinary garden variety, but one on a much higher level. True Reality is That Consciousness behind what we call the material world, The nature of that True Reality is beyond detection by the scientific mind. It is the Silent World, and can only be approached via the intuitive mind.
But the most compelling question of all is: what is the raison d'être for this manifesting of the world by Pure Consciousness?
edit: the 'two things coming together' is Consciousness acting as if (ie; 'virtual') what it is manifesting is real.
When you twirl a lighted cigarette in the dark, it appears to be a circle of fire, when in reality, it is actually a single point of light. So it doesn;t actually exist as a circle of fire "even if for that tiny small period of time it's there".
Virtual particles are real and they are a manifestation of the interactive nature of the universe, not a manifestation of consciousness.http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-virtual-particles-rea/
That seems to be the default position for some people. If we can't comprehend or understand what ketchup is, then everything must be ketchup...or mayo for the Absolute Sandwich.
Virtual particles are real and they are a manifestation of the interactive nature of the universe, not a manifestation of consciousness.
John Hagelin is on crack for thinking that the universe is composed of consciousness. Consciousness is a complex form of interaction. The universe itself is one giant interactive field.
What you are seeing is a "God-of-the-gaps" approach, ie we still don't fully understand consciousness so it's an opportunity to sneak in a load of religious mumbo-jumbo and pseudo-science. Unfortunately none of this incoherent drivel actually helps us to understand consciousness any better.
Okay, so everything is "consciousness", but he still does not explain what consciousness is. That seems to be the default position for some people. If we can't comprehend or understand what ketchup is, then everything must be ketchup...or mayo for the Absolute Sandwich.
My theory of interaction explains consciousness as being a complex form of interaction, therefore not everything is consciousness, nor is everything conscious, but everything does interact in varying levels of complexity.
That's right. Unfortunately there are those who can't resist their imposing religious beliefs on the natural world, in this case it's a sort of new-age Hinduism.
Even worse there are some who can't resist preaching their bizarre incoherent theories.