Couldn't have said it better myself...

[Subduction Zone]

Well of course, we could always go back to which theory is right or wrong, right? I have already explained to you the basics, so energy --
By the way, yes, various religions or sects have a concoction of hell, naturally not quite like the Urey-Miller experiment.

If you are wondering about energy that would probably be covered n The Big Bang Theory. That also has nothing to do with evolution.

You are making a "So what?" argument again. In case you forgot a "So what?" argument is so poor it is refuted by those two words.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It's kind of like hell. Things like hell have different takes in the various groups. Thrust that smooth sequence imagining aside...

Please, let's concentrate on evolution here. Unless you want to admit that you are wrong. There is no excuse to wander so far afield.

 

[YoursTrue]

Yes. That is about abiogenesis, not evolution. Abiogenesis is not verified yet. There are still some good sized problems.

So what? The theory of evolution does not depend upon abiogenesis. Let's say by some miracle that abiogenesis was shown to be wrong. That would not affect the theory of evolution in the slightest.

It sure would. No matter what you say -- how it all started on the earth is questionable by scientists. Very hypothetical, would you say? Or somewhat hypothetical as to how whatever initial substances started it all. Go back to energy...yup...when one's energy leaves the body, totally what happens? The body -- dissipates, doesn't it? Why yes, it does.

 

[YoursTrue]

If you are wondering about energy that would probably be covered n The Big Bang Theory. That also has nothing to do with evolution.

You are making a "So what?" argument again. In case you forgot a "So what?" argument is so poor it is refuted by those two words.

Sure energy has to do with life and how evolution supposedly works. Without that, there IS no life as scientists see it. Evolution of natural selection can't happen without energy.

 

[YoursTrue]

Please, let's concentrate on evolution here. Unless you want to admit that you are wrong. There is no excuse to wander so far afield.

It's all connected. I am not wrong. Maybe you are wrong.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It sure would. No matter what you say -- how it all started on the earth is questionable by scientists. Very hypothetical, would you say? Or somewhat hypothetical as to how whatever initial substances started it all. Go back to energy...yup...when one's energy leaves the body, totally what happens? The body -- dissipates, doesn't it? Why yes, it does.

No, it does not. Evolution only deals with life once it existed, And we know that there was an "abiogenesis event" on the Earth. At one point it had no life and then later it did. Even the Bible agrees with that.

And one's energy does not "leave the body". In fact people do not appear to have energy in that sense, Life appears to be just a complex chain of chemical reactions. There is plenty of evidence for that, there is no evidence for anything else.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Sure energy has to do with life and how evolution supposedly works. Without that, there IS no life as scientists see it. Evolution of natural selection can't happen without energy.

Nope. Not in the mistaken way that you are using that word.

 

[YoursTrue]

@Subduction Zone or rather, maybe you should consider whether you have been misled by the standard statements put forth about evolution as if it's true.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It's all connected. I am not wrong. Maybe you are wrong.

You do not understand. This is just another "So what?" argument. It does not matter if "It's all connected" or not. That has nothing to do with evolution and that is why you are wrong for trying to use such an argument.

From now on all "So what?" arguments will be refuted with a "So what?" You keep rudely making the same errors. You cannot expect others to be polite in responding to you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

@Subduction Zone or rather, maybe you should consider whether you have been misled by the standard statements put forth about evolution as if it's true.

No, we know why evolution is correct. You are assuming that others are as ignorant as you are.

If you learned you could check the facts yourself.. As it is all that you have is denial and that is a losing tactic.

 

[YoursTrue]

No, it does not. Evolution only deals with life once it existed, And we know that there was an "abiogenesis event" on the Earth. At one point it had no life and then later it did. Even the Bible agrees with that.

And one's energy does not "leave the body". In fact people do not appear to have energy in that sense, Life appears to be just a complex chain of chemical reactions. There is plenty of evidence for that, there is no evidence for anything else.

You must think I believe you or the science you embrace. No insult, but I do not. As if the science you espouse is truthful and something that is incumbent to accept. As I have said before, I used to go along with the theory. Standard or otherwise about evolution. I no longer do as explained by believers in the theory. When a body dies, it disintegrates. No more energy in it. It's gone. Very interesting.

 

[YoursTrue]

You do not understand. This is just another "So what?" argument. It does not matter if "It's all connected" or not. That has nothing to do with evolution and that is why you are wrong for trying to use such an argument.

From now on all "So what?" arguments will be refuted with a "So what?" You keep rudely making the same errors. You cannot expect others to be polite in responding to you.

lol, I think you're funny. Because I see now, thanks to you and some others, how prejudiced you and those on your team can be. Bye again for now --

 

[Subduction Zone]

You must think I believe you or the science you embrace. No insult, but I do not. As if the science you espouse is truthful and something that is incumbent to accept. As I have said before, I used to go along with the theory. Standard or otherwise about evolution. I no longer do as explained by believers in the theory. When a body dies, it disintegrates. No more energy in it. It's gone. Very interesting.

No, we all know that you deny reality. That is what makes so many of your posts rather laughable. It would be nice if you tried to learn,.

I know that ignorance can be very very comforting.; If you knew how you are calling God a liar you would be quite worried. Ignorance saves you from the fear.

 

[Subduction Zone]

lol, I think you're funny. Because I see now, thanks to you and some others, how prejudiced you and those on your team can be. Bye again for now --

Wow, that is some first class projection. It is also a reportable post. You cannot call others "prejudiced" without evidence. Just because you lose the debates does not make your opponents prejudiced.

 

[YoursTrue]

No, we know why evolution is correct. You are assuming that others are as ignorant as you are.

If you learned you could check the facts yourself.. As it is all that you have is denial and that is a losing tactic.

There ARE no facts. There are, to be clear, fossils. Those are facts. But there are no facts regarding the theory of evolution. Again -- bye for now.

 

[YoursTrue]

No, we all know that you deny reality. That is what makes so many of your posts rather laughable. It would be nice if you tried to learn,.

I know that ignorance can be very very comforting.; If you knew how you are calling God a liar you would be quite worried. Ignorance saves you from the fear.

(sigh)

 

[Subduction Zone]

There ARE no facts. There are, to be clear, fossils. Those are facts. But there are no facts regarding the theory of evolution. Again -- bye for now.

Why do you persist in telling falsehoods? Is your faith that weak? I am rather amazed.

II also think that it is rather blasphemous when a Christian insists that their God is a liar.

 

[Subduction Zone]

(sigh)

My sentiments exactly. Why does reality scare you so much? The strong in faith are not afraid like this.

 

[Subduction Zone]

(sigh)

I have a very serious question for you:

Is it okay to lie for Jesus?


I do not think that you have done this yet, but I can tell from your posts that you have been using sources that actively lie for Jesus. Is Jesus so weak that he needs dishonest men to lie for him?

 

[Heyo]

I have a very serious question for you:

Is it okay to lie for Jesus?


I do not think that you have done this yet, but I can tell from your posts that you have been using sources that actively lie for Jesus. Is Jesus so weak that he needs dishonest men to lie for him?

How often have you successfully nailed a pudding to a wall?